Nah. What you like is subjective. But you can't say "I think fallout 4 is well written" and not be wrong. Because quality itself is not subjective. This ain't hard.
Yeah that would explain why they moved forward with titles like "fallout 3" and "fallout 4" like they're sequels or something.
It is explicitly connected to fallout 3 with dialogue with Veronica and arcade.
Which means saying it's objectively good for mindless fun is wrong. On the same note everyone who plays this game is going to experience objectively bad writing, objectively sub par shooting, and an objectively shallow Gameworld. These things are bad. That's fact. The subjective part is whether or not you care.
It's not subjective.
No I like them because they're good games.
Except they're very clearly billed as sequels and spinoffs are expected to maintain continuity just as actual sequels are.
No. Writing quality is not subjective. Why do we give games awards if there are no objective standards for them?
You would be objectively wrong, yes.
Just because he linked a bum argument doesn't mean another argument isn't valid, dude.
That's because it's not opinion.
Obviously not since you don't seem to care enough to take a second to understand why the whole "art is subjective" stance is actually stupid.
Objectively? If I didn't like the story, I didn't like it. It could be grammatically flawless, but if I didn't like the direction it was taken, it's subjectively bad to me. You're so set in the 'if someone hates something I like, they're wrong' mentality. Sure, better stories can and have been told, but that doesn't diminish the game. Even if they had rebooted it and called Fallout 3 'Fallout', you wouldn't be satisfied. You'd say "Oh no, they redid the story. I hate their reboot, the old games are better." And that's your opinion. But it's subjective.
No, you would still be wrong. I can not like something, but still appreciate how well designed it is. By your reasoning, me not liking a whole genre of games makes them bad. That's how atrocious your reasoning is.
Nah fam that just means you didn't enjoy it. I don't enjoy the godfather. But that movie is objectively well made. I do enjoy howard the duck. The movie is objectively not good. This ain't hard dude.
Objectively, by your definition, seems to be what the majority dictates. Some people would find Howard the Duck to be a well made movie, and the Godfather to be a poorly made movie. It's like Scream. Scream was a poorly made movie, in my opinion. Yet it's seen by many others as one of the greatest films of the 90s. It's not that anybody is right or wrong. It's that their opinions are different.
Ftfy
These people would be wrong and possibly retarded.
Nope, still can't call them bad because i don't like them. That would be spitting on good game design. I don't care for the Devil May Cry games, Bayonetta games and anything in that genre, but i'm not gonna call the whole genre bad because i don't like it.
This is one of my favorite genres.