Could You Handle Fallout Conditions?

Oh yeah, and I have a M1 helmet i got from an antique shop, so that helps my chances a bit. Also if you do go in a shelter, it would be better to come out a quarter month after. Too long and you might get a little ​CRaAaAaZy!
 
welsh said:
Regardless of ideology or numbers, the environment may experience a "tipping point" when there is little we can do to reverse our extinction.
Click to expand...
Yup.
This is fresh article summing up endangered underground resources of drinking water across the globe, based on report of NASA environmental specialist Jay Famiglietti. One third of those supplies stopped replenishing already:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4626

And this is doomsday clock:
http://www.stockholmresilience.org/...netary-boundaries-2.0---new-and-improved.html
 
Last edited:
One thing is surviving bombing and another is surviving in radiated wasteland. It depends on your luck really. If you're lucky enough to survive bombs in some kind of shelter and then go out in a low-radiated place with not too dangerous creatures then it's pretty similar to surviving in a forest. Pretty sure I could do that.:cool:
 
I would probably die during the initial bombing. I'm only 18 and I'm not exactly swimming in cash so I doubt I would be able to afford a vault nor am I anybody important so I also doubt I would be put on the list. But if I did I don't know if I would be able to. We would be in a mad world where you cannot trust anybody and I have a tendency to easily trust someone.
 
valcik said:
welsh said:
Regardless of ideology or numbers, the environment may experience a "tipping point" when there is little we can do to reverse our extinction.
Click to expand...
Yup.
This is fresh article summing up endangered underground resources of drinking water across the globe, based on report of NASA environmental specialist Jay Famiglietti. One third of those supplies stopped replenishing already:
http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?feature=4626

And this is doomsday clock:
http://www.stockholmresilience.org/...netary-boundaries-2.0---new-and-improved.html
Click to expand...

This is what I could see as real potential dissaster.

See people always talk about Oil and fosil energy and other resources, but for me that isn't really that much of a problem. Humans can adapt pretty well to it, if they have to. Our species could continue without it.

But water is something that we really need. We can't exist without water.
 
Pinkolik said:
If you're lucky enough to survive bombs in some kind of shelter and then go out in a low-radiated place with not too dangerous creatures then it's pretty similar to surviving in a forest. Pretty sure I could do that.:cool:
Click to expand...
Let's hope at least some midland lakes and basins in small countries would remain untouched. That'd help me a lot, because I'm a seasoned fisher, it's my hobby since childhood. Hunting in forest would be too difficult for me, those rabbits and foxes are timid and fast as feck! Mushroom collecting is all I could do here. :mrgreen:
 
If the world came to an end I would likely die in a blaze of gunfire early on. Most people can't handle the conditions, anyone who claims they can is either a well trained soldier or a liar.
 
Battlecross said:
If the world came to an end I would likely die in a blaze of gunfire early on. Most people can't handle the conditions, anyone who claims they can is either a well trained soldier or a liar.
Click to expand...

Or a civilian who's lucky enough to be taken care of by a community, any kind, such as people capable of surviving in todays jungles, deserts, ghettos or refugee camps.

We forget that we don't *have* to be the hero. We can be like Fred, dragging our feet around the ruins of a town, begging for change
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top