Atomic Postman
Vault Archives Overseer
Is Dave going to the deathclaw area really any worse than any of the wonky stuff in Fallout 2, or even meant to be taken seriously? Seems deliberately ridiculous and too much is being read into it. I didn't even know this till now.
On the topic of references to 3, I really like the idea of a BOS internal conflict resulting in some kind of political and ideology struggle ultimately leading to armed conflict/assassinations for some chapters. If they have the numbers the side in favor of opening up and either trading with outsiders and offering services would win out. Seems a better way to go than to just have the BOS die out, or whatever. They don't have to be altruistic knights like in 3, but making them not dead set on locking themselves in a box and dying is a better use of the idea. Not sure if people don't like their use in the east, or just how they're written. Both?
As far as showing a non-isolationist chapter of the BoS, I didn't think 4 didn't do a terrible job even though it all culiminates in such a terrible conclusion (Blowing up the Institute being antithetical to basically any of their goals).
Highly radicalized, highly millitarized and mobile. The Brotherhood shouldn't have interest in governing. Protection they offer should be a means to an end (of acquiring technology and recruits).
I think making them a faction in a traditional sense makes them pretty fundamentally boring.