Eden Project, where black people are banned.

Yes?

  • Total voters
    6
  • Poll closed .
And what about your ancestors? The people who've worked very hard in order to turn chunk of wilderness to inhabitable and safe land, built roads, houses, and great architectonic pieces generations after generations? I'd never ever leave their hard work to some rampaging ignorant third-worlder just like that, that's the same as spitting on their graves.
 
If my ancestors made a dumb decision on where to build their land, how to treat the natives and in turn fucked up life for me then I don't see why I should give a shit. I hold no loyalty to land nor blood nor culture. I care far more about my life than becoming a genocidal monster or a fear-mongering isolationist racist so I'd move. I'd make sure to stop by the graveyard with a mouthful of spit though.
 
Interesting, these cultural differences. This bond between the past and future generations is very important part of motivation in lives of any Slavonic folks. Also, we have a couple of days in every year dedicated to honoring and remembering our predecessors, it's a mixture of Celtic, Slavic, and Christian traditions celebrated in every family, so this is pretty much inseparable part of our identity.

edit: So yes, I can understand Project Eden very well.
 
image.jpg
 
Antiwarprofallout said:
View attachment 6343
Click to expand...
Buxbaum666 said:
Whatever you do, please don't learn "the basics about South Africa" from a cult leader who thinks slavery is just a part of society and nowadays we're all slaves anyway because we pay taxes. Oh also Disney family movies are brainwashing everyone, apparently.
Click to expand...
Wow, that really refutes everything he said in the video.
Nice arguments guys.
Must be nice not having to actually watch the material provided and provide legitimate and constructive arguments to what he actually says (and provides all the fucking sources for right in the description) in the video.
I guess South Africa is actually a wondrous paradise blacks and Whites alike because your ad hominem attack of someone (based on a 7 year old article and something he said about voting WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY before Trump where if you actually watched that video instead of just relying on memes for your non-arguments it was because all the options at the time were bought and owned by donors which Trump isn't which is why he is now showing support for him. He never went back on his priciples, he didn't bother with voting then because of all the donors behind the canidates, Trump is a canidate without donors, thus voting matters again. It's amazing what you find out when you actually know wtf you're talking about. He's literally addressed this very thing in a video recently) merely relating information that is readily available to everyone is invalidated because...........?

But by all means let's not focus on the actual content of the video, just call everyone a cultist and ignore the actual topic at hand so we don't have to make real arguments.
 
Last edited:
I'm not trying to debunk his arguments in said video, they're well made and have facts backing them up, I'm poking fun at his ideological inconsistency in regards to voting.
 
Antiwarprofallout said:
I'm not trying to debunk his arguments in said video, they're well made and have facts backing them up, I'm poking fun at his ideological inconsistency in regards to voting.
Click to expand...
Perhaps this was posted before my edit:
Vergil said:
(and something he said about voting WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY before Trump where if you actually watched that video instead of just relying on memes for your non-arguments it was because all the options at the time were bought and owned by donors which Trump isn't which is why he is now showing support for him. He never went back on his principles, he didn't bother with voting then because of all the donors behind the canidates, Trump is a canidate without donors, thus voting matters again. It's amazing what you find out when you actually know wtf you're talking about. He's literally addressed this very thing in a video recently)
Click to expand...

Basically at the time of that first video years ago, yes voting didn't matter because all of the candidates were bought and paid for by the wealthy donors. Now we have a candidate, Trump, who is not beholden to donors and thus why voting is important again.
Theres no inconsistency there.
 
Buxbaum666 said:
Whatever you do, please don't learn "the basics about South Africa" from a cult leader who thinks slavery is just a part of society and nowadays we're all slaves anyway because we pay taxes. Oh also Disney family movies are brainwashing everyone, apparently.
Click to expand...

He's got some fair points on certain topics, and he definitely researches his points and backs them up with fact. The problem is he's starting to sound a lot like Sargon of Akkad. Most of his content tends to toe the line between informative and pure fear-mongering.

The thumbnails for his YT videos are hilariously cringy and reek of click bait.
 
Vergil said:
Must be nice not having to actually watch the material provided and provide legitimate and constructive arguments to what he actually says (and provides all the fucking sources for right in the description) in the video.
Click to expand...

I don't fucking have to. If I posted a video of a random guy filming himself talking for 90 minutes you'd immediately dismiss it as a absolutely retarded non-source. I even went farther than is reasonably required, I showed you (even though you obviously didn't' look because well why would you start now when you never have before) how terrible of a "source" that Molyneux is.
 
Buxbaum666 said:
I don't fucking have to. If I posted a video of a random guy filming himself talking for 90 minutes you'd immediately dismiss it as a absolutely retarded non-source. I even went farther than is reasonably required, I showed you (even though you obviously didn't' look because well why would you start now when you never have before) how terrible of a "source" that Molyneux is.
Click to expand...
Like I already said all of his sources are in the video description so its not just "some guy talking" nor is Molyneux himself the source. I guess the meme of peoplenon youtube being too stupid to read the description is still alive and well.
 
Last edited:
Vergil said:
its not just "some guy talking"
Click to expand...
I know, he's a cult leader who thinks slavery is just a part of society and nowadays we're all slaves anyway because we pay taxes and also Disney family movies are brainwashing everyone. Also a libertarian anarchist who is a fan of Thatcher and supports Trump.
He obviously has deep insight on any topic you could think of and he can and does talk about them for hours on end. Breastfeeding, circumcision, estrogen based parasites, genetics, Brangelina breakup, 9/11, being a single mum, The truth about Angry Birds: The Movie, the Great Depression, why Robin Williams killed himself, you fucking name it. He can plaster 10,000 links below his videos, I don't care. I won't listen to this nut talking for 90 minutes and try to verify it all from all these sources. Especially not on complicated history topics. Give me books by actual historians, or, preferably, condensed articles or Wikipedia entries sourced from these books. Thankyouverymuch.
 
Buxbaum666 said:
I know, he's a cult leader who thinks slavery is just a part of society and nowadays we're all slaves anyway because we pay taxes and also Disney family movies are brainwashing everyone. Also a libertarian anarchist who is a fan of Thatcher and supports Trump.
He obviously has deep insight on any topic you could think of and he can and does talk about them for hours on end. Breastfeeding, circumcision, estrogen based parasites, genetics, Brangelina breakup, 9/11, being a single mum, The truth about Angry Birds: The Movie, the Great Depression, why Robin Williams killed himself, you fucking name it. He can plaster 10,000 links below his videos, I don't care. I won't listen to this nut talking for 90 minutes and try to verify it all from all these sources. Especially not on complicated history topics. Give me books by actual historians, or, preferably, condensed articles or Wikipedia entries sourced from these books. Thankyouverymuch.
Click to expand...
Ok good job ignoring the entire rest of and point the post. He provides his sources directly in the descriptions, you're free to read and refute them or continue posting ad hominem word salads aka non arguments
You cant go "lol these sources im not even going to bother to take even a cursory look at are bad because i say so ;^)".
If this was just shit he was saying without any sources to back him up that'd be one thing and we could start to talk about the man himself but his personal life and personality are irrelevent, the facts presented in the sources are.
And if you cant actually be fucked to watch any of thr videos and/or check the sources you're not really qualified to call them into question are you? Which raises the question, why are you bothering to argue against his content if you cant be fucked to do the bare minimum research needed?
 
Last edited:
Vergil said:
You cant go
Click to expand...
Oh, but I can. As someone who repeatedly scoffed at the idea of Comedians being a source of facts, can you explain to me why I would want to learn about history from a guy who makes scene-by-scene over-analyzations of Disney movies?

From his "The Truth about Frozen":

There are certainly overtones of lesbianism in the story – as a man says about Elsa’s sexual availability, “No one was getting anywhere with her,” – and homosexuals do sometimes appear to have “magical powers” (at least before they were able to adopt and raise children) because they just had so much more time and resources than straight couples with kids. Certainly, trying to repress stigmatized characteristics that only grow in power – and explode during puberty – would have been a constant struggle for historical homosexuals, but I don’t think that the story is fundamentally about homosexuality, despite the all-male cast in the shop sauna. The same stigmatized/repressed continuum powers religious skepticism, scientific advancement, forbidden love of every kind, creativity among dull people, existential boredom, child abuse, contempt for “small talk” – you name it. Atheists in a religious community don’t often get – or necessarily even want – dates, this does not make them gay. Making the movie about homosexuality seems kind of gay-obsessed – the vast majority of mankind is in the closet about some damn thing or another.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that's... what? That's a bunch of text that may look profound at first glance but is really just a bunch of bullshit. The best word to describe this guy is a German one: Dampfplauderer.

I also like his opinion that anyone who likes fantasy movies/games/etc is mentally damaged and should stop doing that. Like Star Wars or Harry Potter (who is actually insane and Hogwarts is a mental institution because magic is always a metaphor for insanity).

There is this continual drive toward fantasy that comes from being crushed early in life. And so if you’re attracted to these kinds of things, if you fantasize about your capacity for violence, if you daydream or are drawn towards movies with cartoony kinds of violence, that is a certain sign – to my way of thinking, it’s just my opinion – that you are bleeding from a crushed, stomped, and humiliated heart. Please stop and stanch the wound. The flight into fantasy is actually very dangerous.
Click to expand...
Also
(...)the prelude to an adult sexual relationship is masturbation, and from this violence, the murder of his parents, who does he escape with? Han Solo. You just throw a D in there, there’s Hand Solo, which is obviously a synonym for masturbation.
Click to expand...
(...)Chewbacca, who’s a big well-armed vagina, and you can tell it’s a vagina because there’s no clothes.
Click to expand...
And even the whole Death Star is this huge testicle.
Click to expand...

That's interesting, Mr. Molyneux, now please tell me all you know about South Africa. Right after that I will escape from my family of origin and send you money forever.

["Big well-armed vagina" is actually an awesome phrase, tbh.]
 
Buxbaum666 said:
Oh, but I can. As someone who repeatedly scoffed at the idea of Comedians being a source of facts, can you explain to me why I would want to learn about history from a guy who makes scene-by-scene over-analyzations of Disney movies?
Click to expand...
Because comedians like John Oliver dont release all of their sources right along side their videos that are readily resdable like Molyneux does. This and all the garbage youve written afterwards are irrelevent to both the topic at hand and my post. You still havent looked at the sources nor actually critiqued the video. When confronted on this you attempt to switch the topic to completely unrelated other videos and him personally. Actually take the time to look at what the actual conversation is about and refute that instead of trging to deflect into unrelated bullshit, or admit you cant, youve lost, and leave.
Pro-tip: Crying cult leader and quoting unrelated videos isnt a refutation of his South Africa video or the sources within nor is it an argument.
With all the effort you've now taken to try and attack his character you probably could have just clicked on all the sources, read them, and have an actual useful response to the discussion by now.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top