Look, we're getting a bit ridiculous in being contrite here. If Bethesda didn't include any gore, we'd tear 'em to shreds. They do...and we complain about it.
Honestly, guys...SHUT THE FUCK UP.
Gore is good. Gore is an integral part of Fallout. Is it possible Bethesda is overdoing it? I dunno. All they've done so far is overstate it in PR, and try to equate gore to maturity. That is indeed stupid.
But when we're talking about the game itself, there's nothing wrong with a lot of gore, provided that the V.A.T.S. slo mo sequences are optional.
The big downer in the apparent prevalence of gore is - course - that it's no longer special. You could pick up bloody mess as a perk and it'd overdo the violence, but I remember during one of my early playthroughs, I shot someone in Junktown with a shotgun and half his body blew out in a chunk. Me and my buddy spent half a minute staring at the screen before trying to figure out how we did that and how to be able to do it again.
Bethesda makes it sound like gore is no longer tied to either bloody mess or critical hits, and that's a shame. But whining about the gore itself? Don't. Even. Go. There. Period. Period.
Edit: ok on second read I think most of you would agree with the above. Still, while it's a valid point to talk about the prevalence of discussing gore when talking about combat, this isn't actually different than the PR of Fallout 1/2, and it's a bit silly to retro-complain about it.