Fallout: New Vegas E3 previews

cunningandvalor said:
I have another point, if what they say in the trailer is true and House "won" Vault 21 from its original overseer (or whatever) and THEN turned it into a luxury casino, they're going to HAVE to explain where all of these resources are coming from. Even if NV wasn't hit with a nuclear explosion, the custom injection molding process and neon filament manipulation that would be required to create a giant sign like that would have to be outsourced from Vegas. And the other thing is that one of the articles lists Vault 21 as a "dive"? What does that mean?

Well, If it was an essentially casino-like vault, who says that the neon couldn't have already been set up in the vault itself? all they would have had to do is remove it and set it up outside
 
Dionysus said:
aenemic said:
I don't really understand how you can even think that. is it just because it doesn't have a number in its title? I don't get it. stupid people are stupid.
I don't know, I've always thought of Fallout 2 as a full-priced expansion pack. It's definitely less of a rip-off than a typical Madden "sequel", but they made it in less than 2 years.

well, I don't agree at all. there shouldn't be some kind of time limit on what you can call a sequel and what you call an expansion. it's all about content: if the game has enough content to stand alone as a full game, then it's a sequl. also, does it require you to own the previous game? if not, then it's a sequel. ("sequel" may be replaced with "spin-off" where applicable). an expansion is rarely a full game and requires you to have the original game installed.

that said, Modern Warfare 2 should have been an expansion to the first Modern Warfare.
 
Well, people just say this, because the graphic doesn't look totally different. Graphic whores, everyone. :>
 
warsaw said:
cunningandvalor said:
Even if NV wasn't hit with a nuclear explosion, the custom injection molding process and neon filament manipulation that would be required to create a giant sign like that would have to be outsourced from Vegas.

Must be the same place Gizmo got his.

Gizmo lived in a town where the economy was based on salvage, I think it's a lot more likely that they found the resources to make his small sign in Junktown than to suggest a ten-story custom neon monolith on the top of a building was constructed in or around a city that imports all of its construction and maintenance.
 
Lexx said:
Well, people just say this, because the graphic doesn't look totally different. Graphic whores, everyone. :>
And the gameplay was pretty-much the same. Fallout 2 had a mild improvement in the way that companions were handled, and you could destroy some doors. It was basically just Fallout with a new story and some tweaks.

Anyway, it looks like the frame-rate is suffering pretty badly in some parts. Is that a 360 thing, or is it just an early build?
 
Yeah, but I don't see a problem in this. It was moar Fallout, exactly what everyone wanted to have.
 
Incognito said:
Well, If it was an essentially casino-like vault, who says that the neon couldn't have already been set up in the vault itself? all they would have had to do is remove it and set it up outside

Okay, I accept this reasoning, although they did say that the laws of the vault were “decided by chance” not necessarily that it was a casino during the Vault experiment. I think they were just governed by entropy, we’ll find out though.

aenemic said:
Dionysus said:
aenemic said:
I don't really understand how you can even think that. is it just because it doesn't have a number in its title? I don't get it. stupid people are stupid.
I don't know, I've always thought of Fallout 2 as a full-priced expansion pack. It's definitely less of a rip-off than a typical Madden "sequel", but they made it in less than 2 years.
well, I don't agree at all. there shouldn't be some kind of time limit on what you can call a sequel and what you call an expansion. it's all about content: if the game has enough content to stand alone as a full game, then it's a sequl. also, does it require you to own the previous game? if not, then it's a sequel. ("sequel" may be replaced with "spin-off" where applicable). an expansion is rarely a full game and requires you to have the original game installed.

that said, Modern Warfare 2 should have been an expansion to the first Modern Warfare.

I totally agree with this statement. If you play Megaman 2 and Megaman 10, you’re going to have different experiences. Isn’t a game a procedure or strategy for achieving an end that includes diversion and amusement? If so, finding the water chip and locating a GECK are pretty seriously different ends, even if they both are just about survival.
 
F.E.A.R. Files is an expansion, uses the same shitty engine, and doesn't require you to have the original installed.

So I guess New Vegas can be considered an expansion.

If it uses the same engine, then it's an expansion. I don't know of any expansions that use a different engine from the original.
 
So all the Spiderweb games are only expansions from the very first. Interesting... and wrong.
 
Jet1337 said:
I don't know of any expansions that use a different engine from the original.
And so do many sequelz. Yet they are not seen sold as expansaions. Like others here already said. For a game to stand on its own it doesnt need inherently a new engine.
 
By that definition, Mass Effect 2 would be an expansion of Mass Effect as well.


Just saying.
 
Wow, Half Life 2 has so many expansions. TF2, CS Source, DoD:S, Portal, VTMB, too many expansion packs to name.
:V
 
Alphadrop said:
Wow, Half Life 2 has so many expansions. TF2, CS Source, DoD:S, Portal, VTMB, too many expansion packs to name.
:V

not to mention how many expansions Unreal got and is still getting :lol:
 
Oh sorry guys. Lemme be more specific. If it looks exactly like the last game and is made by the same dev or a dev with permission from the original dev, then it's an expansion.
 
Jet1337 said:
Oh sorry guys. Lemme be more specific. If it looks exactly like the last game and is made by the same dev or a dev with permission from the original dev, then it's an expansion.

um... still not quite there, pal.

if it's an expansion, it's an expansion. if it's a stand-alone game, it's a stand-alone game. it's really not more complicated than that.
 
Lexx said:
So Mass Effect 2 is an expansion.

Technically Mass Effect 1, 2, and 3 are one game divided by comments by players that let the devs know what fits in and what doesn't. This can be said for all games in a series.

Over time the engines used will change and so will the features because of demand.

Expansions and DLC are one in the same. They add more content from the original game using the same assets.

"Sequel" is just a term used for anything that follows the original. I don't think it should be used as a noun.
 
Back
Top