Gamespot has a blogpost up on the frontpage, under user soapbox, fulminating against internet tough guys that bully those that don´t agree with them. Fallout 3 makes a good example:<blockquote>Its been a pretty nasty time of late for anyone who has dared to speak out in support of Bethseda having the Fallout license. The rabid Fallout fans are coming out from their dank warrens and clogging the tubes with their proselytising. Something Awful recently featured No Mutants Allowed, showcasing great examples of humanity such as the guy who slapped his (now ex-) girlfriend for asking what was so special about Fallout and the multiple cases of people threatening suicide if the game is released and threating others who dare to speak out about the game in a manner other than: "It's going to totally suck! It's not turn based, isometric or sprite based! THIS ISN'T REALLY FALLOUT!" [interestingly, the editorial fails to mention the poster was told off by two other posters and given a warning for his behaviour - NMA]. Game journalists have apparently been receiving mountains of abuse any time they dare to preview the game or say something positive about it.
(...)
Is it wrong of me to say that the East Coast could make a great setting for a game that has previously inhabited the area West of Chicago? Or how about to say that the V.A.T.S. combat concept has great potential not just for Fallout, but as a potential system for returning that level of detail to the RPG genre when it is travelling down the first-person path? How about getting those lynch mobs ready - because I think that the First Person perspective offers us a great opportunity to see the world of Fallout as we never have before? Now - this is where you guys at NMA can threaten to slit my throat, because damnit, its a Fallout game, and if it just so happens to reinvigorate interest in that IP, then that's good, even though it might mean that you guys have to suddenly cope with a new group of people experiencing the source of a decade's worth of your wet dreams.</blockquote>Wait? So it's just "you guys at NMA" who've been upset? DaC, the Codex, international Fallout sites, forums with negative reactions like GameFAQS/Bethesda Forums...are all NMA? Wow, I had no idea we were that big...
As for the article, I do not recall weemadando ever posting here. If his research is limited to a joke article by Something Awful, no matter how funny it is, I'm having a hard time taking him seriously.
Wait, I forgot, I'm an internet tough guy..."Braaah, different opinion bad, NMA smash!" There, I've reinforced your stereotype for ya, hope that satisfies. Interesting, tho', it seems to me like weemadando is vilifying a group of people for not agreeing with him. He's calling us all internet tough guys, based only on a difference of opinion. Isn't that the behaviour he's advocating against?
Link: Internets, the land of stupid. on Gamespot.
Thanks Black and Starwars.
(...)
Is it wrong of me to say that the East Coast could make a great setting for a game that has previously inhabited the area West of Chicago? Or how about to say that the V.A.T.S. combat concept has great potential not just for Fallout, but as a potential system for returning that level of detail to the RPG genre when it is travelling down the first-person path? How about getting those lynch mobs ready - because I think that the First Person perspective offers us a great opportunity to see the world of Fallout as we never have before? Now - this is where you guys at NMA can threaten to slit my throat, because damnit, its a Fallout game, and if it just so happens to reinvigorate interest in that IP, then that's good, even though it might mean that you guys have to suddenly cope with a new group of people experiencing the source of a decade's worth of your wet dreams.</blockquote>Wait? So it's just "you guys at NMA" who've been upset? DaC, the Codex, international Fallout sites, forums with negative reactions like GameFAQS/Bethesda Forums...are all NMA? Wow, I had no idea we were that big...
As for the article, I do not recall weemadando ever posting here. If his research is limited to a joke article by Something Awful, no matter how funny it is, I'm having a hard time taking him seriously.
Wait, I forgot, I'm an internet tough guy..."Braaah, different opinion bad, NMA smash!" There, I've reinforced your stereotype for ya, hope that satisfies. Interesting, tho', it seems to me like weemadando is vilifying a group of people for not agreeing with him. He's calling us all internet tough guys, based only on a difference of opinion. Isn't that the behaviour he's advocating against?
Link: Internets, the land of stupid. on Gamespot.
Thanks Black and Starwars.