BigGuyCIA
Yer fond of me Lobster!
In U.S. markets (consumer sales), yes. I can't find anything else internationally except that of the 34% weapon sales that the U.S. government conducts, 18% of it goes to Saudi Arabia.
Shifting goalposts from gun control to missile control. Can't win with you Mutant.
Really? Can't remember the last time I bought a gun from Raytheon or Lockheed-Martin.It's the same industry.
Really? Can't remember the last time I bought a gun from Raytheon or Lockheed-Martin.
Indeed, I can hop on down to the good ol' wally world and buy myself a Ruger Brand ICBM.It's the same industry.
Indeed, I can hop on down to the good ol' wally world and buy myself a Ruger Brand ICBM.
Whatever helps you keep those blinders on about the results of gun violence and gun trade by USA.
Oh no American Gun violence, the ever decreasing statistic that sees it's news coverage increase because it fits the narrative of certain political groups,whatever will we do. Oh no International Weapons selling which somehow only becomes a reprehensible act when America does it because nobody cares if the Missile was French. I got to admit Sclaper, you've erased the line between trolling and stupid and I don't think it is ever coming back.Whatever helps you keep those blinders on about the results of gun violence and gun trade by USA.
It takes a special kind of person to gloat over that and exploit it for virtue signalling material.I think in USA they are due for another big shooting. In 2016 there was the Pulse night club, in 2017 there was Vegas. Still time to beat Vegas shooters 'high score'.
Those fin's do make some great guns. also you guys forgot Sig and Glock as not American companies either (3 of the top 4 hand gun manufacturers in the US are not American) as for the US gun saturation affecting other countries, those would be pretty much only 2. Mexico and Canada, as a Canadian a good portion of our crime guns come from the US. And hell Mexico only has one gun store, located in a military base, in the whole country. Yet somehow firearms not even sold in the US are used there.... gun control, so effective.
Research has shown that many weapons and arms trafficked into Mexico are from gun dealers in the United States via straw purchasers.[101] In response to a 2009 GAO report, the DHS pointed out that the "majority" were 3,480 U.S. origin guns of 4,000 successfully traceable by ATF. These were the arms investigated out a total of 30,000 firearms seized in Mexico 2004 to 2008.[102] Most of the weapons end up in the hands of cartels.[103][better source needed] [104]
Where is the violence located in Mexico though? And also, how many gun companies are there in Mexico?
Also,
Also,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smuggling_of_firearms_into_Mexico#Sources_of_weapons
That's not the whole truth. Our laws aren't really all that much smarter, and while they're probably being more strictly enforced, the main differences are in history and culture. There was no frontier culture in Europe, and most countries have been monarchies of some form for the most time. Guns have been kept out of circulation in civilian hands for most of the time for good reason, and this led to a culture that generally doesn't consider owning guns to be a right but a privilege, that associates guns more with military than with personal freedom, and that all in all relies more on the respective states to protect its citizens rather than citizens protecting themselves. That means there are way fewer guns in circulation, making gun control more efficient since it's not that easy to get a firearm illegally.Funny how US law enforcement officials are all inefficient when it comes to stopping gun runners.
Also, gun violence isn't really a big issue in Europe mostly because we have smarter gun laws than in the USA. Not a perfect situation but better than little to no laws at all or enforced at all (USA).
That's not the whole truth. Our laws aren't really all that much smarter, and while they're probably being more strictly enforced, the main differences are in history and culture. There was no frontier culture in Europe, and most countries have been monarchies of some form for the most time. Guns have been kept out of circulation in civilian hands for most of the time for good reason, and this led to a culture that generally doesn't consider owning guns to be a right but a privilege, that associates guns more with military than with personal freedom, and that all in all relies more on the respective states to protect its citizens rather than citizens protecting themselves. That means there are way fewer guns in circulation, making gun control more efficient since it's not that easy to get a firearm illegally.
The exception to all this is Switzerland, of course, but they also have less of a frontier culture and more of a communal culture.
Sure, the laws are obviously different, but that doesn't mean the causality is purely with the law and the execution.Umm...got proof?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overview_of_gun_laws_by_nation#Comparison
If you compare, say, US and UK, the difference in legislation is clear. Also you can make other comparisons such as Finland and Estonia (Estonia has very high gun violence/homicide figures) etc.
Sure, the laws are obviously different, but that doesn't mean the causality is purely with the law and the execution.
The US suffers from having different laws all over its states, meaning that strict laws in one state don't do much when the surrounding states give you easy access.
Then there's the issue of culture and history, which I think is very important. Even if you established "Oi, got a permit for that letter opener"-style laws in the US it wouldn't solve anything because there are just too many guns around. The social issues that fundamentally cause crime will not be solved by stricter laws.
Comparing Finland and Estonia also requires a look at history. Finland was free to grow, Estonia was held back by the USSR, leading to decreased wealth and more crime. Laws alone don't change much.