Must've been very hard for you to Ctrl C Ctrl V without even putting its source in the first place! At least put it under a spoiler tag or find one that isn't three pages long, eh?
You don't "Debunk" my arguments by pointing at everything I say in a row and yelling "NUH-UH!!!" at each thing in a row.
You don't "Debunk" my arguments by pointing at everything I say in a row and yelling "NUH-UH!!!" at each thing in a row.
This tells me what you're worth. This tells me how intelligent you are. Instead of telling me why you hate and fear guns, you tell me you think I'm wrong. You tell me I make your head hurt, you tell me you think I'm "Dehumanizing" a group of wrong people by debunking their lies, you tell me people have made my points in this thread before(And you've learned nothing from them each time? That isn't really something to brag about), you tell me you think I'm overly jumpy about getting banned, and you insult me by calling me less self-aware than... frogspawn, of all things. Is that supposed to be a Kek reference? You then tell me you don't think I'm credible, and then you call my post a rant and claim my post is like my fingers puking on the keyboard.
Yes. Good synopsis. Let me synopse you then: "The darn liberals are ruining us YO"
You are not civil. You are childish, angry, and dishonest, and this probably isn't the kind of thread you should be posting in. Not if just one post was enough to make you so angry, you felt the need to project your anger onto me.
You must be some kind of shrink master, considering that you base all your knowledge about me and my attiutdue in a SINGLE post that doesn't really even feature my own opinion (done that already here). Now if that ain't projecting...
Why would I be mad?
I don't have to respond to anything else in your post besides that, but in the interest of giving more mature people on your side (If any exist) something to respond to, I will.
"Nananana I can't hear anything!"
He doesn't have to. In a world without lying liberals slandering the very act of owning a gun, multiple people in a town will have guns, and they will be able to defend themselves from theoretical corrupt government attacks well enough that a far smaller percentage of soldiers would be willing to get mowed down by US Citizens they swore to protect on the US soil they swore to protect on the orders of corrupt government officials. I trust you know your history well enough to know what historically happens after governments disarm their populace.
- In what country must you live to consider the notion that your own government might attack you
unprovoked, and that then you would archieve anything. Really. You've got a democratic state, not eing occupied by the fucking Combine.
- Nothing in particulat except annoyed noblemen? I do know what happens when civillians are armed in a pinch though, they'll fuck off to go with their own agendas weakening or being unconclusive towards the "popular" front.
>You're literally the NRA
Nevermind the previous, now THIS is projecting!
You realize that most of the facts, sources and conclusions on your article, which god knows where have you unearthed it from, are from the last century, right? And that a fair amount doesn't precisely favour your case at all...
Nevermind your wonderful lack of mention of your absolutely retarded "point", Courier! :thumbsup:
What happens once a judge says that police is forced to protect all citizens?
That they do it? Not like it's too hard when they've sworn that over and over.
We currently do not have any tool which gives a skinny 1m60 chick a better chance against a 150kg 2m tall attacker.
Maybe not being anorexic and self defense, not like we've heard that having a gun increases "her" strength passively anyway.
Honestly all the "Against a Tyrannical government!" argumenters must really not be familiar with situations when such events happened, and most are actually coups of varying extents of effect. That the standing army stands up AGAINST the state is indeed a case where civillians would be needed to be armed (even if again, some scrappy fucks would hardly do much against organized military), but in that case, the State can just hand out the weapons from the reserves or confiscate the weapon manufacturers. And again, perspective. Would the last Turkey coup have had to be stopped by civillians? Is every decision of the state that you yourself disagree with imply that you have to start some sweet domestic terrorism? Ultimately, is that chance to decide up to whoever who can get themselves a gun?
