Habemus Papam

Since everyone posts stupid pics:

papst_ratzi.jpg

(Red wine and oblates?! - Not with me!!)

Habemus Papam Bavarius!
 
Many people don't like the new pope-he is not like the previous one.I heard that in an interview he said that he was against gays,divorces,rock music and peace between religions.I don't remmember what he said about the inquisition,but it was not good.

Wooz said:
Duh.

At this point, the only people who could claim otherwise would be our very own pigeonholing executive, CCR, the ultra-catholic brainless Polish extreme right-wing, and the lowbrow troglodyte from Bulgaria.
Eeeee,przestań pluć na mnje swoją spermą.
eusadoh17rp.gif
eusadoh17rp.gif
eusadoh17rp.gif

Excuse me,have you ever seen my face :?:
[EDIT]Whatever-it is bullcrap again:I am not a man without any cultural interests
 
Was ist? ? ? said:
Many people don't like the new pope-he is not like the previous one.I heard that in an interview he said that he was against gays,divorces,rock music and peace between religions.I don't remmember what he said about the inquisition,but it was not good.

The old pope was against homosexuality and divorces too.

I always liked the fact that Catholics at least remain more consistent about the marriage thing than, say, the average American (non-Catholic) Christian. People, please, if you're going to ban gay marriage, ban divorces too, both are abominations in the eyes of the Lord.

And Ratzinger is just a bit behind, I think he's still thinking of Elvis when he talks about rock music.

As for the cross-religion thing, it's obvious Ratzinger is going to look in a different direction. His pro-Jewish and pro-Christian unity message seems to be one that the USA for one will appreciate greatly, especially since he cares little for the muslims (odd how he proclaims the Jews to be spiritual brothers but not the muslims, whose Qu'uran is more similar to the Catholic Bible than the Jewish Torah, which is only half the bible (and not the nice half at that)). It'll be interesting to see how the Greek and Russian Orthodox churches will react to his overtures.

Was ist? ? ? said:
Excuse me,have you ever seen my face :?:

low·brow Pronunciation Key (lbrou)
n.

One having uncultivated tastes.

In fact, you should use the dictionary more often, mate...

chau·vin·ism Audio pronunciation of "chauvinist" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (shv-nzm)
n.

1. Militant devotion to and glorification of one's country; fanatical patriotism.
2. Prejudiced belief in the superiority of one's own gender, group, or kind: “the chauvinism... of making extraterrestrial life in our own image” (Henry S.F. Cooper, Jr.).

Your multi-ethnicity does not mean you could not possibly be a chauvinist, but hey, who cares?
 
Many people speak different things about the pope but we shall see what we shall see.

Kharn said:
Was ist? ? ? said:
chau·vin·ism Audio pronunciation of "chauvinist" ( P ) Pronunciation Key (shv-nzm)
n.


Your multi-ethnicity does not mean you could not possibly be a chauvinist, but hey, who cares?
Hehehe-my teacher :lol:
I ment "a chauvinist" There is no mistake




My "multi-ethnicity" really means that I can't be a chauvinist,because Bulgarian and Serbian "patriots"(not ordinary people-over 95% from the population) hate each other and fight over some bullshits.I can't escape from my nationality,but however-I can be accused of everything(for example-a Slavic chauvinist :lol: )
 
Was ist? ? ? said:
My "multi-ethnicity" really means that I can't be a chauvinist,because Bulgarian and Serbian "patriots"(not ordinary people-over 95% from the population) hate each other and fight over some bullshits.I can't escape from my nationality,but however-I can be accused of everything(for example-a Slavic chauvinist :lol: )

Do not use small fonts.

"1. Militant devotion to and glorification of one's country; fanatical patriotism. "

You don't have to be chauvinist about Bulgarians or Servs, you can be chauvinist about, say, thinking your country is superior to Turkey, which you have shown you do. Hence you are nationalistically chauvinist. I really don't care what race you belong to. Black nazis are chauvinist too. Stupid, yes, but also chauvinists.
 
New Pope has been chosen by God, so he must be good. I hope he will follow the way that JP II started...
And about what new Pope said in the past about homosexual people etc. - if u don't know, it is written in Bible that having sex or/andto feel loveto sb who is the same sex is a sin, so there is no way church could accept that, even if priests wouldn't have anytthing against - it would be like saying that Bible has mistakes and we (I'm talking about Christians of course) should not follow it exactly...
 
Sajdon said:
And about what new Pope said in the past about homosexual people etc. - if u don't know, it is written in Bible that having sex or/andto feel loveto sb who is the same sex is a sin, so there is no way church could accept that, even if priests wouldn't have anytthing against - it would be like saying that Bible has mistakes and we (I'm talking about Christians of course) should not follow it exactly...

The Bible also says "what God has joined together, no man may seperate", indicating that divorce is a sin. Yet divorce is let pass.

The bible also says;

Leviticus 11 said:
1 And the LORD spoke unto Moses and to Aaron, saying unto them: 2 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying: These are the living things which ye may eat among all the beasts that are on the earth. 3 Whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is wholly cloven-footed, and cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that may ye eat. 4 Nevertheless these shall ye not eat of them that only chew the cud, or of them that only part the hoof: the camel, because he cheweth the cud but parteth not the hoof, he is unclean unto you. 5 And the rock-badger, because he cheweth the cud but parteth not the hoof, he is unclean unto you. 6 And the hare, because she cheweth the cud but parteth not the hoof, she is unclean unto you. 7 And the swine, because he parteth the hoof, and is cloven-footed, but cheweth not the cud, he is unclean unto you. 8 Of their flesh ye shall not eat, and their carcasses ye shall not touch; they are unclean unto you. 9 These may ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them may ye eat. 10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that swarm in the waters, and of all the living creatures that are in the waters, they are a detestable thing unto you, 11 and they shall be a detestable thing unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, and their carcasses ye shall have in detestation. 12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that is a detestable thing unto you.

Ever eat pork? Prawn? Hare? Ever touch a dead bit of any of these animals? That's a sin! You're going to hell in a handbasket, buddy!
 
Silencer said:

It's as Jewish to say God hates homos as it is to say God hates prawn. I don't think Jesus ever refuted either directly (the remark against the Pharizees doesn't count, you Bible-ignorant lout)
 
Actually as far as I remember there's not a single word in the Bible about God hating homos.

There are a lot of vague remarks about basically anything tho, that after a few dozens of bad translations can sound like they mean that homos should be hung, cows are evil and the Martians should become our supreme rulers.
 
Ashmo said:
Actually as far as I remember there's not a single word in the Bible about God hating homos.

Homos, no. Homosexual marriage, no. But homosexual sex, yes. Althought some people say "thou shalt not lay with a man as thou wouldst with a woman" doesn't mean anything as you can really lay with a man as you would with a woman. 'cept if you enjoy female butt-sex.
 
Also notice how incredibly ambigous the Bible was in nearly all of the original translations.

No real surprise most people basing their beliefs on the literal content of the nth translation would turn into fanatics.

But hey, since Jesus obviously was a blue-eyed blonde Anglo-Saxon Aryan deep inside, the English translation is the only Bible that counts, right?

Right.
 
Ashmo said:
Also notice how incredibly ambigous the Bible was in nearly all of the original translations.

No real surprise most people basing their beliefs on the literal content of the nth translation would turn into fanatics.

But hey, since Jesus obviously was a blue-eyed blonde Anglo-Saxon Aryan deep inside, the English translation is the only Bible that counts, right?

The funny thing is that this also holds true for the Qu'uran. Arabic is way too easy to translate in various different ways for it to be a very reliable text in translation and even in original Arabic it might be a tough nut to crack (dunno, never read it in Arabic)

And hey, man, you won't find any disagreement with me, I just like turning the Bible inside out on the Bible-thumping hacks that cite the Bible to hate faggots.
 
GOD HATES FAGGOTS.

Yes. Indeed.
How come the Greek didn't get wiped out by a flood then?
 
Back
Top