Here's a crazy thought *spoiler warning*

Hehe, now that's an idea I'd like to see... honestly...

But seriously, what's the point of having unlimited sex in Fallout? I mean, if you want it because then you would think the game is more realistic, then that's not the only thing that needs to change. If you want it because you're just addicted to gaming and sex, there are better ways to get some. And if you want it because it's more roleplaying-ish... uhm... rrrrrrrright...
 
Excessive amounts of sex and sex oriented shit in games can just degrade the game, and turn it into absolute crap... You would spend most of the time trying to get laid (because you can't in real life) and just lose what serious content the game may have...

I am not against sex in Fallout, it is just that too much is ridiculous and stupid.
 
Sorrow said:
Lazarus Plus said:
I think the whole topic is silly. The option to have sex with them whenever you wanted would accomplish what?
Better roleplaying.
If I play a character that likes sex, he/she should be able to have sex as often as he/she wants (if it's possible of course.).

Roleplaying doesn't mean "Playing a sex addict, huh uhuh huh uhuh."

Generally when you take on a role in a game, the things that person does tend to be pertinent to the game itself, not some poorly wedged in fantasy about what your real sex life was.
 
What having sex after marriage has to with being sex addict?
What's the point of having someone as useless and uninteresting as Miria or Davin in party other than having sex with her/him?
I never heard about anyonyone who kept them to the end.

Also I think that a high INT/CHA character should be able to convince them to act more reasonably.
That would make them something more than an poor joke about marriage.

As for sex and roleplaying.
I play Fallouts in Iron Man style (ie. without loading when I die or something goes wrong [except bugs of course]), so my characters are mortal and surrounded by death and destruction (wasteland, highwaymen, slavers, etc.)
Sex in game has rather symbolic meaning to me and is the direct opposite of causing death or getting killed.
 
Sorrow said:
What having sex after marriage has to with being sex addict?
What's the point of having someone as useless and uninteresting as Miria or Davin in party other than having sex with her/him?
I never heard about anyonyone who kept them to the end.

Also I think that a high INT/CHA character should be able to convince them to act more reasonably.
That would make them something more than an poor joke about marriage.

As for sex and roleplaying.
I play Fallouts in Iron Man style (ie. without loading when I die or something goes wrong [except bugs of course]), so my characters are mortal and surrounded by death and destruction (wasteland, highwaymen, slavers, etc.)
Sex in game has rather symbolic meaning to me and is the direct opposite of causing death or getting killed.

All I'm hearing from you is "I want to be able to have sex in this game all the time, when I want to have sex, which is all the time." You still haven't addressed the central question, HOW IS IT USEFUL, AT ALL? It doesn't add anything significant to the game. Justify your case.
 
FeelTheRads said:
I want to be able to sodomize under-aged girls in Fallout 3.

I want to be able to force other people to sodomize under-aged girls in Fallout 3...

Anyhoo...

Sorrow said:
What's the point of having someone as useless and uninteresting as Miria or Davin in party other than having sex with her/him?

Personal shield, mule, target practice... they can also be sold as slaves... well, I don't think thats useless... having sex with them all the time is pretty useless IMHO...

Seriously, get a life...
 
I understand the roleplaying implications of it actually; it's the difference between a real roleplayer who asks what his character would do and then does it, and the casual gamer who only does something in game because it's immediately and obviously to his advantage in his goal of finishing the game to see the ending animation.
I've roleplayed a total sex-addict who fucked anything he could; and I've had characters who only slept with Mrs. Bishop because I always do the quest (because it's so much fun to rub out Bishop) and it's the closest thing the PC can have to a real relationship in the game (Not counting Miria and Davin 'cause they're a joke; although once in the late 90s I did drag her cute-but-useless ass through most of the game).
The more freeform and absorbing a RPG is the better it is. Fallout 2 is very freeform and absorbing. Think of all the items you have that are useless, all the story holotapes and computer logfiles. They're story; they're flavor. They're there to absorb you into the gameworld. Sex with NPCs can be the same thing, if it's done right. It can range from the nearly soft-porn nature of the Baldur's Gate II NPC FlirtPacks (http://www.pocketplane.net/) to the simple fade out/fade up from Fallout 2, with however much text is appropriate to the encounter. You can have sex with people in the real world, and so too should you be able to in a game world, and it's up to the player how important they make it; it's just there. Some people read the flavor holotapes, some people don't.
 
Lazarus Plus said:
You still haven't addressed the central question, HOW IS IT USEFUL, AT ALL? It doesn't add anything significant to the game. Justify your case.
I know, some body has to make a "the five minute man mod" for fallout 2.
It should make possible to have sex with miria/david and it would heal your char by 5hp per time, and you should be able to have two times sex in a day per one point in endurance. And now why it's called five minute man mod; cause with endurance of 1, the sex takes 5 minutes, endurance of 2, the sex takes 12 minutes... endurance of 10 it takes an hour. :lol: And of course there should be some STDs that are included by poison and radiation damages...
 
Lord 342 said:
Not counting Miria and Davin 'cause they're a joke; although once in the late 90s I did drag her cute-but-useless ass through most of the game.

I usually drag her cute-but-useless arse to the desert, shoot her in the head and return to her father to tell him the bad news. :twisted:
 
alec said:
I usually drag her cute-but-useless arse to the desert, shoot her in the head and return to her father to tell him the bad news. :twisted:

Nah..I just equip her with a 10mm-smg and power-armor and let her deals with 3 mutants and see her falls like a barbie doll :twisted:
 
I think that killing her in church and then punishing all Modoc population is more interesting :) .
 
Jarno Mikkola said:
Why don't you just hit her to death.

Because hitting a woman with your bare hands is wrong and, simply put, not done.
One should always use a blunt object when hitting a woman.
Preferably a tool of some sort.
The word 'wrench' comes to mind.
Repeatedly.
 
alec said:
Jarno Mikkola said:
Why don't you just hit her to death.

Because hitting a woman with your bare hands is wrong and, simply put, not done.
One should always use a blunt object when hitting a woman.
Preferably a tool of some sort.
The word 'wrench' comes to mind.
Repeatedly.

I think he meant the other hit...


EDIT: Lead pipe FTW.
 
alec said:
Because hitting a woman with your bare hands is wrong and, simply put, not done.
One should always use a blunt object when hitting a woman.
Preferably a tool of some sort.
The word 'wrench' comes to mind.
Repeatedly.

Wrench the Wench!
 
alec said:
Because hitting a woman with your bare hands is wrong and, simply put, not done.
One should always use a blunt object when hitting a woman.
Preferably a tool of some sort.
The word 'wrench' comes to mind.
Repeatedly.
Well the hand is a blund odject, at least when it not yours, and hitting some one means unarmed and melee, or isn't hitting with a crowbar not hitting.

And it goes: Welsh, Wrench the Wench!
_________________
"Ah I am just opening some doors,
to let the flow to the floors,
when your blood goes to the halls,
to wash away the igy stains,
made by your brains." :twisted:
 
Back
Top