Muuuuuuuslim Baaaaaan! But don't call it that!

At least they're getting their asses handed to them in Yemen and their influence curbed in Iraq. Saudi Arabia is a ticking time bomb. Once the oil runs out and Saudi Aramco ceases to exist, we'll see a collapse greater than the crisis now, because for all the talk of a post-Oil Saudi Arabia, little has been or can be done. It'll be a deserted place, save for the Mecca-Medina corridor.
And than we have a Middle East influenced by the authoritarian government of Iran, which while still religiously strict is more progressive and secular than Saudi Arabia.
 
Why do you think the US supports Saudi Arabia? It does so especially because it's so weak, to secure Arabia's oil and to ensure they act as an appropriate counterbalance to Iran. It used to be Iraq but well... thanks to the Americans, not anymore. Unless the Americans go into isolationism, they'll probably defend or support Saudi Arabia in a war against Iran, because having an American-opposed nation like Iran dominating one of the biggest oil reserves on the planet is a big no-no. So if Donald Trump was trying to stop terrorism he would include Saudi Arabia, but as he, and naturally like no other American leader wants to insult it.

It's a sad day that the US is so meek with the Saudi's, helping them stay in power and ignoring their atrocities. It's sadder because the Saudi's use America's lack of courage with them to become more and more bolder, as we can see from their invasion of Yemen and blatant support of terrorists.

Iraq couldn't even invade Iran successfully even after a revolution and the Shah's army leadership disappearing. Even with the rest of the world backing them. I doubt the Saudis or even Israel could ever dream of taking on Iran. If anyone else is a major power in the east its not Isreal or the Saudis, its Turkey. Just as large as a population as Iran and just as a defensible.
 
Iraq couldn't even invade Iran successfully even after a revolution and the Shah's army leadership disappearing. Even with the rest of the world backing them. I doubt the Saudis or even Israel could ever dream of taking on Iran. If anyone else is a major power in the east its not Isreal or the Saudis, its Turkey. Just as large as a population as Iran and just as a defensible.
A large part of that is because of the terrain, the fact that the Iraqi army sucks, the various Kurdistan nationalists who sided with Iran and because the Iranians were motivated to defend their country. It's not uncommon for a what is seemingly a weak country torn apart by a revolution to be invaded by other nations (case in point, France after the French Revolution when the Austrians invaded). The Saudi's wouldn't be able to take it, but Israel has nukes. And Turkey is pretty powerful, but it barely practices it's influence apart from supporting Syrian Rebels against the Kurds.
 
Big protests at the airports. They've been holding just some average people in detention? So much is happening, even our national media has difficulty staying up to date.
 
How many terrorist attacks were suffered on the US soil during Obama two terms, or Bush 2nd terms ? How is it suddenly more important to ban muslim ? Ofcourse, let's not mention the people killed by us citizen with guns on the us soil. Or those killed worldwide by us bombs.

Not saying terrorists don't exist, but it is an extremely minor treat compared with many of those actually faced by us citizens.
 
Yes, but it makes an awesome scape goat and it is a great way to get attention, without actually fighting someone. Like you can not really take the jews these days, since it has become somewhat out of fashion you know, WW2 and and that, the Germans kinda spoiled the fun for everyone in that part. And the Soviets collapsed on their own without permission, so what is left to keep the people frightened?

And than we have a Middle East influenced by the authoritarian government of Iran, which while still religiously strict is more progressive and secular than Saudi Arabia.
But largely seen as a terrorist regime by the US ...

Do you know what everyone with half a brain really fears? Unified middle east. Imagine if that region would gain some stability and peace for just 10 or 15 years where they actually get together and forming a Union like the EU in Europe. It would be a real power house. However, as strange as it sounds, the middle east and most parts of Africa will be the looser in the future, not because of our military, but because they will suffer the most from the effects of climate change. However, no one can say how things will turn out when it's not 1 million refugees washing up on Europes shores, but 100 million people, over 1 year in 2090 or what ever, when the average temperature has climbed up 4° and a lot of places run out of water and farmable soil. If we don't manage up to this point to at least use around 70 or better 90% of renewable energy as sources our energy needs, we might be really fucked.
 
Last edited:
A large part of that is because of the terrain, the fact that the Iraqi army sucks, the various Kurdistan nationalists who sided with Iran and because the Iranians were motivated to defend their country. It's not uncommon for a what is seemingly a weak country torn apart by a revolution to be invaded by other nations (case in point, France after the French Revolution when the Austrians invaded). The Saudi's wouldn't be able to take it, but Israel has nukes. And Turkey is pretty powerful, but it barely practices it's influence apart from supporting Syrian Rebels against the Kurds.

Try justifying the use of nukes on large civilian populations in this day and age to anybody. You would either be out right attacked or lose all support. Lest we not forget the various pro Iran Palestinian groups and the fact every neighbor Israel has hates them and would invade them given the chance. Iran has always been the most powerful nation in the region, maybe not the largest but it could take on anyone else there and win.
 
I never understood this fear of Iran anyway, when you look at it, they are one of the more progressive regimes down there, as far as islamic nations go. I mean they have lots of females in their parliament for fucks sake.
 
I never understood this fear of Iran anyway, when you look at it, they are one of the more progressive regimes down there, as far as islamic nations go. I mean they have lots of females in their parliament for fucks sake.

The VP for Iran is a women btw. Yes the government can be authoritarian (but so was the Shah, who himself was not a bad man by any means) and unlike the Shah's reign there are now many non secular religious rules (but nowhere near as bad as ISIS or the Saudis) but not only have the rules become so much more lax but its also a legitimate democracy. There are parties with different opposing views, various religious groups/ethnicity's have seats in parliament and so do a lot of women. If you think Iran is some sort of backward uncivilized shanty town of a country you do not know anything about Iran. Only country arguably more progressive and secular is Israel and Turkey. But both country's have huge issues with other ethnic groups (Kurd's and Palestinians) and are very authoritarian.

Also a great post detailing how an US invasion of Iran would be one of the biggest military disasters in US history: https://www.quora.com/What-would-be-the-nature-of-a-US-led-invasion-of-Iran
 
No one is going to invade Iran, but the USN will wipe the gulf clean and the Israelis *will* strike any nuclear site they see. That I can foresee, if we really have to get into a shootin' war, but an invasion - who is saying to march the Marines to Tehran? That's wholly different. It'll be a smackdown, but not a murder, sort of thing.
 
from countries that could pretty fairly be described as barbarous and uncivilised.
Like the UK? I have seen the football hooligan groups UK has in action live, right in front of me while destroying shop windows and breaking cars and attacking the police.
And they were even "educated" people, let me quote a news article about it:
The Englishmen had been arrested after a night of running battles with police during which bottles and chairs had been hurled at officers. They were not ill-educated and feckless young football fans from broken homes but studious achievers from comfortable middle-class homes as well as married men in settled jobs.

They included an archaeology student and the son of a consultant psychiatrist who lectures at Oxford University.
Barbarians and totally uncivilized for sure.
 
Last edited:
No one is going to invade Iran, but the USN will wipe the gulf clean and the Israelis *will* strike any nuclear site they see. That I can foresee, if we really have to get into a shootin' war, but an invasion - who is saying to march the Marines to Tehran? That's wholly different. It'll be a smackdown, but not a murder, sort of thing.

Even then it be disastrous, they will retaliate and badly. Just in general its a smart idea not to go to war with Iran. They have just as high chancing of winning as the US/Israel might.

But I feel we are getting a bit off topic, but I did feel I need to stress Iran isn't a war zone nor is it a backwards totalitarian regime. Nor would it be a smart idea or very successful to attack or invade Iran. The Iran ban makes no sense because no Iranians have been terrorists. It shows the ban for what it really is racism and Islamophobia its not utilitarian in the slightest.
 
Eranistan

I think you overestimate their chances. The USN has already engaged the Iranians in the 80s. The USN objectively won. Israel, as well, has the slant in air force. If the USN denied the Persians the gulf, and the Israelis strike the reactors - which they have done to Syria and Iraq already - there's no real chance of them 'winning'. It wouldn't even be a war, it's denial, strikes. Israel doesn't want Iran to get nukes and will bomb Iranian facilities. The USN can sink every boat and ship the Iranians have in the gulf - easily. The goals of the two powers against Iran are much more tangible and realistic than the Iraqi goals, and since no boots are going to be slogged you'll barely hear a whimper about it.
 
Try justifying the use of nukes on large civilian populations in this day and age to anybody. You would either be out right attacked or lose all support. Lest we not forget the various pro Iran Palestinian groups and the fact every neighbor Israel has hates them and would invade them given the chance. Iran has always been the most powerful nation in the region, maybe not the largest but it could take on anyone else there and win.
Well firstly, don't target large civilian populations. In this day and age rockets can be so accurate we can target large armies on ground with the help of computers. Secondly, I think if you're going to be raped, it doesn't really matter if others will queue up for a gangbang. Basically, the premise of nuclear warfare is that both powers would rather go down swinging than go down dead, which is why it's dangerous. If Israel, hell if merely the government is to fall utterly, they may think that it's worth bringing down Iran with them.

The problem with that assessment I find is that most other nations are backed by stronger powers like Russia, but specifically the US. They don't have to invade (though I bet that they can and win, no matter what some with person with a political degree will say), just repulse the Iranians, bomb them to shit and isolate them. They'll never really defeat Iran, but turning them into a Muhadjeen style guerrilla state or weak government would be good enough. Although all of this is conjecture, and doubtful to happen. Unless Iran tries to violently expand (not gonna happen), the US and Israel won't get into a fight. Hopefully. Iran and Turkey are the best hope for the Middle East.
 
Trump_s_Einreiseverbot_verschont_Laender__in_denen-01.png

"The immigration ban excempts muslim countries where The Trump Organization owns golf courses and real estate".
SwQ8yQS.jpg


While it is admirable to finally a see a politician actually do all the things verbatim that he promised during the campaign, it's not all that great that it had to be this one...

But the good thing is that he's pushing for safe zones in Syria and so on, providing aid where it's needed, because it's kinda silly to let people travel half the globe through dozens of safe countries and still call them "refugees" if we're being honest. Providing help locally is definitely the way to go... Although recent reports from libyan refugee camps indicate that these camps are seriously bad. Like, concentration camp bad, where smugglers randomly shoot people. Which just goes to show that the aid needs to be provided locally, and not after they travelled literally to another continent.
 
Last edited:
Iran's the odd one out. All the rest have unstable or tottering governments that make background checks impossible or even hard to do. That would be my excuse, but the inclusion of Iran just turns it into a political (perhaps business) move, rather than an attempt to create a safer America.
 
Islam is a barbarous religion.

So by logical extension Muslim majority countries are......

Even without the invasions its a joke. They stone gays, kill adulterers and much more horrid stuff. All of this is endorsed in the Koran.

Thats pretty barbarous
Right.
Where is the bann on nations that have christian fundamentalist groups like Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) in Uganda?
The LRA is a minority within Christianity. Most Muslims are at least vaguely extremist. Go check some of Vergils old posts for stats.

God I wish that guy were still here.
The Englishmen had been arrested after a night of running battles with police during which bottles and chairs had been hurled at officers. They were not ill-educated and feckless young football fans from broken homes but studious achievers from comfortable middle-class homes as well as married men in settled jobs.

They included an archaeology student and the son of a consultant psychiatrist who lectures at Oxford University.
Minority
mʌɪˈnɒrɪti,mɪˈnɒrɪti/
noun
  1. the smaller number or part, especially a number or part representing less than half of the whole.
    "only a minority of properties are rented"
a few groups do is also utterly retarded.
The majority religion of these countries is barbaric and uncivilized
Then again, you are a joke on the forum.
This really rustles my jimmies.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top