Muuuuuuuslim Baaaaaan! But don't call it that!

Well, the ban is pretty much dead anyway. Ironic since Obama did something similar.

Onto new threads!

Catch ya laterz!
 
Only when your position well, includes immoral, racist and puppy killing arguments.

Sorry, when I call things how I see it.

I have no problem with beeing a retarded liberal super leftist stalin worshiping communist warrior. I admit it. I can stand to my ideology. Can you say the same? Why has only the alt-hyper-what-ever-nut-job-right a problem with admiting their colours? "I DUN HATE MUSLIMS BUT ... *Racist/biggoted/xenophobic-argument*" - "I M NUT RACIST BUT MSULISMS!"
Yeah. I get it. THose people are shit. And you don't want them here. Of course not all of them are bad! No no! That would be 'racist' so only a 'majority' of them are bad. And 'insert example for confirmation bias here' is the proof! How many of you have grown up with muslims? How many of you are educating muslims? How many of you own the Quaran, the biogrphy of the prohpet or actually took their time to LEARN something about? To see what different schools there are in Islam, the difference between wahhabism and Al Quaida? What makes someone a Sunni and Shia? What is the difference between Hamas and Hesbola? And where does ISIS fall in all of this? You do understand, that there are many in the Muslim world that actually HATE(!) ISIS, right?

And even IF IA AGREE and say, well you're right, there are many bad Muslims, yes, we have to watch out for the bad apples, yes, we have to protect citizens, but we can not generalize and making Europe in to a fortress while we fuck everyone outside of it and not giving a fuck about refugees and immigrants, then I am suddenly the bad guy here who wants to kill every european.

I get it now.
 
Crni Vuk said:
Yeah. I get it. THose people are shit. And you don't want them here. Of course not all of them are bad! No no! That would be 'racist' so only a 'majority' of them are bad. And 'insert example for confirmation bias here' is the proof!
Click to expand...
Do you realize this is exactly what you're doing all the time? Paint whole country as a fascist state driven by nazi ideology, insert FABRICATED TERRORIST ATTACK COMMITED BY WHITE RAYICIST as a proof of your claims, after it fails insert another WHITE RAYCIST kicking poor German citizens down the stair, which is of course fabricated as well, then try lame attempt of etymological lessons with the word gypsy.. And after all these debunked fails just go on and on with repeating your leftist mumblings to no end, with smugness reaching critical levels at frightening rate.

How many of you are educating muslims?
Click to expand...
You're educating moslems now? I thought you just keep staying at school hall for minimum wage trying to look important, didn't know you're a pedagogue actually.
 
Nah, you just bloviate too much, spam anecdotes, gish gallop, and treat the west like it's a lifeboat. It's pathetic, really.

If Vergil was the alt-right spectrum, you're sitting opposite to him.
 
What a prejudice! As you can see, I'm a tolerant person, discussing with retard without discriminating him.
 
Bowling Green is 30 miles away from my house, FYI.

Amusingly, this is the SECOND national racist shit in my area.

The woman who refused to do gay marriages is the one who did my wife and my marriage. She also is obnoxious about speeding tickets.
 
CT Phipps said:
Bowling Green is 30 miles away from my house, FYI.

Amusingly, this is the SECOND national racist shit in my area.

The woman who refused to do gay marriages is the one who did my wife and my marriage. She also is obnoxious about speeding tickets.
Click to expand...

She did your wife? No wonder you're annoyed.

in all seriousness I think that would be prejudiced against gays, not her being racist. Not sure why you'd mention her otherwise?
 
Prone Squanderer said:
if you label things that aren't racist as racist it just dulls the term racist.

I dislike that word purely because it's thrown around so much. Same with bigot and anything-phobe.
Click to expand...

I keep handling it just as a branch of Godwin's Law. Helps a bit, but doesn't remove the frustration of knowing the other side does not take it that way.
 
So far Trump's presidency is interesting, and it's only a beginning.
I believe if a ban would affect only white christian people, then nobody would complain (which is wrong) but as soon its minorities or some special group of people, people scream buzzwords like racist, bigot, etc
Effect of these words should and will wear off eventually, and facts will stand.
 
Marinc said:
I believe if a ban would affect only white christian people, then nobody would complain
Click to expand...
That's one hell of an assumption. I'm sure lots of people would complain if a ban specifically targeted white christian people.
Effect of these words should and will wear off eventually, and facts will stand.
Click to expand...
Yup, the facts that when there were people in need elsewhere in the world, Trump turned them away to appease the masses.
 
CT Phipps said:
Well, the ban is pretty much dead anyway. Ironic since Obama did something similar.

Onto new threads!

Catch ya laterz!
Click to expand...
Similar maybe, but it seems Trumps decree was unconstitutional, or are the federal judges simply SJWs? Or worse, brainwashed libtards pushing a leftist agenda? Or could it be, that a federal judge simply knows more than the average guy - which is his job. I mean you really can NOT say that Judge James Robart, is someone that feels like an easily corrupted person.
 
Crni Vuk said:
.. or are the federal judges simply SJWs? Or worse, brainwashed libtards pushing a leftist agenda?
Click to expand...
Hardly, since they obviously don't resort to lies and fabricated stories as these regressive leftist often do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top