My Landscape Idea

Francis said:
I love it when people blindly assume things and embarrass themselves completely in the process. :roll:

He's trolling. Though as Requiem... uh, T-Bolt said he chose the right thread to do it in.
 
Im not exactly sure what you mean by trolling, my ideas may not be popular to the mods and admins but the point is tehy are needed and our supported by many 'normal' people.

The fact is F2 onwards teh games were unpopular, something needs to be done or the series will meltdown, wether or not the above example is applicable depends the point is something needs to change.

Some people would say stuff about FPS fallout and fallout online, i agree with oyu these are very bad ideas, however 3D and reatime aren't, coupled with a new setting and story line these can save fallout.
 
Nuerof said:
but the point is tehy are needed and our supported by many 'normal' people.
Define 'normal'.

Nuerof said:
The fact is F2 onwards teh games were unpopular,
They were unpopular because they moved away from Fallout's setting and gameplay, but the rot started in FO2 with it's real world guns, talking deathclaws, new reno and emphasis on sex, drugs and easter eggs.

Nuerof said:
however 3D and reatime aren't, coupled with a new setting and story line these can save fallout.
More likely would rape and sodomise Fallout. Oh whatever Bethshitda do will most likely save Fallout finanically, they've got enough fanbois willing to shell out for every little power armour addon they release but Fallout as the standard for cRPGs will be well and truely dead.
 
Nuerof said:
Im not exactly sure what you mean by trolling, my ideas may not be popular to the mods and admins but the point is tehy are needed and our supported by many 'normal' people.

The fact is F2 onwards teh games were unpopular, something needs to be done or the series will meltdown, wether or not the above example is applicable depends the point is something needs to change.

Some people would say stuff about FPS fallout and fallout online, i agree with oyu these are very bad ideas, however 3D and reatime aren't, coupled with a new setting and story line these can save fallout.

Yes, you are trolling, which would mean you have thus far trolled every area of this forum. Your stupid ideas have been debunked over and over. Also, don't assume to know what "normal" people want and think.
 
Nuerof said:
Im not exactly sure what you mean by trolling, my ideas may not be popular to the mods and admins but the point is tehy are needed and our supported by many 'normal' people.

The fact is F2 onwards teh games were unpopular, something needs to be done or the series will meltdown, wether or not the above example is applicable depends the point is something needs to change.
Do you know why they were unpopular?
That's right, because those games didn't adhere to the original Fallout formula.
Then how, pray tell, could changing the formula again save the series in any way?

Stop trolling.

Also, for fuck's sake, go read some of the old threads on things as viewpoint and turn-based combat. There are many good reasons why these belong in Fallout. Before you reply any further, show some reason and go read those threads.
 
I can't believe there is nine pages of this! Stop talking and make the game! If it people like it they'll like it. If they don't they won't. :)

Personally I'd love to see a Water World style Fallout, where you have turn based vehicle combat as well as hand to hand combat.

Imagine an army of scraggers on jet skis attacking a super tanker like in the WW movie? Then if the scraggers board the tanker, you can play the fight out turn by turn on the tanker and outside in the water. Also you could raid costal towns or defend them.

Now tell me that wouldn't be fun. :)

Fallout: Pirates Ahoy! ;)
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 31, 2006 19:04 Post subject:
Nuerof wrote:
Im not exactly sure what you mean by trolling, my ideas may not be popular to the mods and admins but the point is tehy are needed and our supported by many 'normal' people.

The fact is F2 onwards teh games were unpopular, something needs to be done or the series will meltdown, wether or not the above example is applicable depends the point is something needs to change.

Do you know why they were unpopular?
That's right, because those games didn't adhere to the original Fallout formula.
Then how, pray tell, could changing the formula again save the series in any way

But it could be nmade to fit the setting, as it would be absed off the west coast the story line could easily be shifted..
 
Davaris said:
I can't believe there is nine pages of this! Stop talking and make the game! If it people like it they'll like it. If they don't they won't. :)

Personally I'd love to see a Water World style Fallout, where you have turn based vehicle combat as well as hand to hand combat.

Imagine an army of scraggers on jet skis attacking a super tanker like in the WW movie? Then if the scraggers board the tanker, you can play the fight out turn by turn on the tanker and outside in the water. Also you could raid costal towns or defend them.

Now tell me that wouldn't be fun. :)

Fallout: Pirates Ahoy! ;)
It'd be pretty goddamn ridiculous, though, since Fallout is based on a world where Fuel is very, very limited. How can you then possibly have fleets of fuel-powered vehicles?
 
sOMETHING PEOPLE FAIL TO UNDERSTAND IS THAT (oops sorry for the caps) oil has *not* run out or actually come close to running out, the fallout based scenerio is when a economic hole appears, from the texas oilfields drying up, this triggers global economic meltdown leading to nuclear exchnage, there *is* still oil, definatly enough oil for small scale communities and boats.

Also nuclear and fusion power are options, after all fusion cars did exost in the fallout universe, it is reasobanlbe to assume fusion boats did to.
 
Nuerof said:
sOMETHING PEOPLE FAIL TO UNDERSTAND IS THAT (oops sorry for the caps)

Then go back and edit it, lazy.

oil has *not* run out or actually come close to running out, the fallout based scenerio is when a economic hole appears, from the texas oilfields drying up, this triggers global economic meltdown leading to nuclear exchnage, there *is* still oil, definatly enough oil for small scale communities and boats.

What YOU fail to understand, the setting and backstory in Fallout is the lack of oil, leading to electric cars and such. Any processed oil will be unusable, while existing refinery plants will be in extreme decay, and methods to drill new oil will be unlikely, since one of the key objectives in a nuclear exchange and a war of this reason would be to limit the future production capabilities of the enemy. We've been over this at length in topics of working cars. You're a little late to start repeating their arguments.

Also nuclear and fusion power are options, after all fusion cars did exost in the fallout universe, it is reasobanlbe to assume fusion boats did to.

...

Yeah, so since Mitsubishi is making an electric car, there's suddenly going to be electric boats.</SARCASM> A completely different field of engineering, kid.

Electronic cars in Fallout were being introduced (at a pricey tag) as an alternative to gasoline autos...and then both were effectively killed, as ONE remained from the massive EMP fields, and that is because the Highwayman's spare parts were in a shielded location. Hence, another one of Fallout's dark ironies, the weapons that man decides to go to war over lacking oil with...also destroyed a lot of the alternative technologies.
 
perhaps a part of the world map can consist such environment but i think the whole map consisting of thousand islands can be boring. i want to travel massive distances....... :cry:
 
Back
Top