BunkerBud said:
Does that explain why half of the bethesda forum is full of people asking, 'Gee what is fallout, looks like bioshock doiiiiiiiii'
then there are people like you that don't believe things which are unique and special to be transformed into some mainstream garbage, is wrong.
I have to agree 100% that most of the chuckleheads over at the Beth forums shouldn't be allowed to have unmonitored internet time.
Although, you do swing a rather wide paintbrush in terms of categorizing me.
I think that, if done PROPERLY, a game can be re-made into something newer, and possibly better.
I'll outline an example:
I remember the first time I played Metroid on my NES. That game blew me away. It was great exploring the world the designers had created. Then, when Super Metroid (I didn't play the Gameboy one) came out, they managed to keep the same game mechanics and improve on the game in an overall manner (much like FO2 did to FO1). I then learned, later, that they were moving Metroid to a first person shooter style game, in Metroid Prime. I was horrified. However, when Metroid Prime shipped, it turned out to feel exactly the same as the original game had. It was about exploration and puzzle solving, but done in a different POV. I liked it quite a bit.
Another example: I was a huge Ninja Gaiden fan (again with the NES memories). I learned that they were going to re-do this franchise in a 3d action style. I was worried, but the new Ninja Gaiden turned out to be awesome.
So, all I'm saying, is that I'm willing to give FO3 the benefit of the doubt, simply because I haven't played it yet.
Calling FO3 garbage now is like saying you don't like the food at a restaurant that isn't even built yet. How can you know?
I'm nervous about the new game, and after playing Oblivion, I'm a tad worried even, but I'm still holding judgment until I've actually played it.