Cimmerian Nights said:
From CHFF:
A tale of six quarterbacks
http://coldhardfootballfacts.com/Articles/11_3171_A_tale_of_six_quarterbacks.html
I don't care for him personally, but I think this guy is going to make a lot of people look stupid for dismissing him somewhere down the line. I can't believe how narrow minded people get when it comes to a guy that, well there's no need for me to point out the numbers, look for yourself.
The numbers are incredibly deceptive here. There's a very simple reason why these numbers stand out so much: the system Tebow played in. It's not because of his talent that these numbers stand out, it's because the system wasn't built around Tim Tebow passing the ball: it was built around the threat of Tebow running the ball.
Because he runs the ball so much and so well, bouncing off the smaller NCAA athletes, passing windows open up. And Urban Meyer, from what I know, designed his plays to produce a single read who is either wide open or not open. This means that the passing game utilized was a high-reward low-risk passing game, based on the threat of the run. Exactly the kind of system that does not work in the NFL.
The numbers are deceiving because Tebow never carried his team as a quarterback - unlike Peyton, Eli, Couch, Stafford or even Russell. You can see this from the number of passes thrown - only Russell - a three year player who didn't start until halfway into his first season - and Stafford - also a three year starter - threw even a similar number of passes, and Tebow is a 4-year full-time starter! The system allowed Tebow to thrive as a passer because it only forced him to pass in the most optimal circumstances.
It's really like Urban Meyer was producing an offense that required Tebow to do all the things that wouldn't work in an NFL team (this isn't a knock on Meyer, it's his job to win, not to produce NFL players): Tebow never had to go under center instead working exclusively from shotgun, Tebow never had to go through his reads - he had a single, defined read, Tebow never had to work with tight passing windows - the single, defined read was designed to be wide open and could be because of his talent, Tebow is not an elusive runner but a power runner - and that doesn't work nearly as well in the NFL.
Cold Hard Football Facts is usually a fun read, but this is a really, really weak article. If anything, that article just shows that raw college production isn't enough to predict how a QB will work in the NFL, not that Tebow will be a success.
By the way, Clausen's stats are much more impressive given that he's a 3-year starter.
Cimmerian Nights said:
Maybe they're keeping him around for the uncapped year, to tutor/mentor a rookie QB (Clausen?), only to be a cap casualty when/if CBA is reached. Delhomme is Favre-lite, but I can see him being a decent steward/leader working with a rookie.
He'll fuck things up mid season as epected in some 5 turnover game, and the fans will be cheering for the rookie to come in and save the day.
Like Warner passing the baton to Eli in NYG.
Funny thing is that this is about the best case scenario for the Browns. Whoo-boy I have no idea what Holmgren is doing.