Brother None said:
Cimmerian Nights said:
Wait, I thought the entire country was enamored with the whole "stepping out from Favre's shadow" storee line.
Dude when will you stop talking to us as if we're responsible for national media stories. No one here buys into that shit.
Yeah, asking one person to bear the burden of an entire fanbase's yahoos is pretty stupid.
Nobody has to like Favre, but to ignore his career
in toto, and only focus on the last few years is awfully shortsighted. He deserves his due as the most productive, durable QB ever.
I kind of doubt that's what drives Rodgers anyway. This is the kind of romantic b.s. Cinderella narrative the sports press always shovels. I think they have a dozen prefabricated archetypes they just force each game into to suit their entertaining story, reality be damned.
Not necessarily the Packers tho. Corners aside, their defense matched up pretty well with the Packers. Jennings was invisible and with Driver out Rodgers was steadily forced to go to his drop-happy WRs. That's pretty good.
Once you (wisely) realize that running against that front is suicide, yeah, you have great matchups. You don't even need to pretend to run it against the Steelers. Empty backfield, spread 'em out and shred em.
I was wrong about McFadden, but his backup did a pretty good job of getting toasted in his place.
And for the lack of running, all those drops, to come away with only 3 sacks and no turnovers didn't help Pitt.
Cimmerian Nights said:
You think the '01 Patriots were better than the '01 Rams?
No, that's a different question. I think the Rams were better than the Pats, the Pats better than the Giants years back and damn better than the Jets this year, and you better believe I think the Seahawks were better than the Steelers in '05. But that's just a random opinion no one cares about.
It's like Rex says, you only need to be better for that one game.
I don't think the Pats are better than the Jets either. On a squad level, the Jets have better talent everywhere except TE and QB. And playoff coaching.
For the most part yes. But not the best. The lack of rungame was mostly on the defenses playing well, but I don't know how much I can credit the defense for all of those dropped passes and Ben's bad day (which is surely for a good chunk on the defense, but not all of it. Their O-line held up well).
Did the Packers run it a dozen times, even including the clock killing at the end? To their credit, running was not in the gameplan.
Roethilsberger is generally a mediocre QB statistically. Expected more from him on that last drive though.
*scratches head*
See, an' here I thought I was a Packer fan who's been watching #38 for a couple years. Only time I've seen him do something like that. So that makes him suck? Riiiight. If you were a superhero your only power would be that of intense hyperbole.
Dude, stop. I'm not slagging his career as a CB. I'm just pointing out he was a real bonehead on that ST play.
And shit, if you were a super hero you'd be Foul Spoutie Poopie Joke man, my kids would love you. But they're young enough for the fecal fixation to be justified.
I figure that was mainly Fox's presentation though.
I'm not a fan of any Fox sports coverage. That stadium tells it's own story, and they never capitalize on things like that.
Joe Buck is just a tool.