Kharn said:Yes. Are you? Not counting the violent war waged against the policy, how much has graffiti done to change Poland?Wooz said:nobody's fighting the Big Bad Government
Wooz said:nobody's fighting the Big Bad Government
Changed? Nothing much. The hippodrome wall in Warsaw, maybe. It's hardly what you'd call a national reform project.
Kharn said:However, considering the small fraction of people talented and interested in the visual arts and the even smaller number sent there by graffiti, "a friend of a friend"-examples non-withstanding, I hardly think this is a relevant factor
And how exactly would you know this is a small fraction of people?
That means EVERYONE is paying just so graffiti-artists can keep their status intact. Does that sound fair?
Hold on. EVERYONE is paying just so some mobile phone network has its ad on a train in the first place. Yes, the ads are paid for, obviously. The only thing amiss here is that the Polish rail's material condition hasn't changed since, oh, ten years? That huge corruption scandals erupt every month about just about every state-run institution?
You have a point, it'd be unfair if the train companies would place non-intrusive ads, and large sums of money would go into cleaning the trains and renovating them.
But the large sums go elsewhere.
Ashmo said:You don't own the trains. You don't pay for ownership of the trains. You pay a fee to use the services the train company provides, and usually using the trains as your canvas is not part of the services they provide.
Indeed, you pay a fee to ride a train to work/study in normal conditions. You don't pay to squeeze into a demolished wreck of a train that hasn't been renovated for more than five years, that has ads sticked onto every surface.
The way I see it, graffiti artists are rather making a service to society than "victimizing" train-riding people, by replacing the stupid ads with something more interesting. People that paint on trains usually don't scribble incoherently, as they tend to be older writers with the actual guts to break into a train yard.
The vast majority of illegal "artists" tends to deface about anything and everything they can get their hands on. And the vast majority of them has no artistical talent or can't be arsed to actually PAINT something and just leaves a stupid "tag" or scribble
Oh, so that makes it OK to treat them as a bunch of rampaging hools destroying shop windows, does it?