Opinions on man made Climate Change

It exists, and it sucks. We're be dead by the humidity before a meter rises, though. And only we can stop global warming! Destroy the industrialized farms today!
 
It's a bullshit story spread by zero-growth Keynesian faggots and happily adopted by every tax farmer in the world.

But you're going to believe it because scientists financed by those taxes tell you to.
 
Well, we have less and less snow in my country every year and the overall temperatures are getting higher, so something is heating up.

I would also be inclined to believe this is human caused, since we already caused the ozone layer to thin out in the 80', but after Montreal protocol in 1989, the hole over antarctic has been slowly healing and shrinking.
 
In my opinion it is obvious that it exists.
We have been reaching extremes in temperatures and other climate factors almost every year now. So it is obvious something isn't right.
 
Climate has always been changing, and it would probably getting warmer without humans, too (we're in a general warming period after a minor ice age).
However, the data suggests that human influence accelerated and enhanced this effect significantly, and it appears to be wise to act accordingly.
 
It's a bullshit story spread by zero-growth Keynesian faggots and happily adopted by every tax farmer in the world.

But you're going to believe it because scientists financed by those taxes tell you to.
6aa0860e0d796716618ddecd879e39e2.jpg

Global warming, "Man Made Climate Change" or whatever you want to call it is a scam
https://mises.org/library/skeptics-case
Also I would suggest educating yourselves on the whole "97% of scientists agree" meme.
http://www.ghgonline.org/humaninfluence.htm
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/04/160412211610.htm
https://www.nwf.org/Wildlife/Threats-to-Wildlife/Global-Warming/Global-Warming-is-Human-Caused.aspx
 
Yes, thank you for repeating your OP again.
I've already counter acted all three of these however, especially the last two which essentially do nothing but claim that the large majority of scientists support the popular notion of man made climate change and it being a danger. One of them even repeats the "97%" number which a very large PDF I posted debunks quite thoroughly. I know posting youtube videos in lieu of argument is frowned upon but if you would like to hear more on why the myth of the "97%" is in fact, a myth, I'd be happy to send you one.
 
I don't really have an opinion on whether it's caused by man or not but all I know is it hasn't snowed properly in five years in my town. I live in Kentucky. Its supposed to snow in Kentucky.
 
Yes, thank you for repeating your OP again.
I've already counter acted all three of these however, especially the last two which essentially do nothing but claim that the large majority of scientists support the popular notion of man made climate change and it being a danger. One of them even repeats the "97%" number which a very large PDF I posted debunks quite thoroughly. I know posting youtube videos in lieu of argument is frowned upon but if you would like to hear more on why the myth of the "97%" is in fact, a myth, I'd be happy to send you one.
The rapid increase in atmospheric concentrations of the three main man-made greenhouse gases is clear from the data sets for these gases over the last 1000 years.
Since around the time of the industrial revolution in Western countries levels of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide of all risen dramatically. Fossil fuel combustion, increasingly intensive agriculture and an expanding global human population have been the primary causes for this rapid increase.

Methane concentrations have seen the biggest relative increase in the last 200 years, concentrations more than doubling. The rate of methane increase appeared to be lessening over the last decade, but rose again in 2007. It is concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide which are the human-made greenhouse gases which we are likely to see increase most in the next 100 years.
ipccsm2.gif


Human activity--such as burning fossil fuels--causes more greenhouse gases to build up in the atmosphere. As the atmosphere "thickens" with more greenhouse gases, more heat is held in. Fossil fuels such as oil, coal and natural gas are high in carbon and, when burned, produce major amounts of carbon dioxide or CO2. A single gallon of gasoline, when burned, puts 19 pounds of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

The role of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) in warming the Earth's surface was first demonstrated by Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius more than 100 years ago. Scientific data have since established that, for hundreds of thousands of years, changes in temperature have closely tracked with atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Since the Industrial Revolution, the burning of coal, oil and natural gas has emitted roughly 500 billion tons of CO2, about half of which remains in the atmosphere. This CO2 is the biggest factor responsible for recent warming trends.

It's a bullshit story spread by zero-growth Keynesian faggots and happily adopted by every tax farmer in the world.

But you're going to believe it because scientists financed by those taxes tell you to.
Heh, is it a bullshit story now?
 
Last edited:
Um, ok. Thank you for repeating your OP for a third time but now in a slightly different format.
You have not counteracted anything you just talked about how the 97% figure is false, you have not yet shown than man made Climate Change does not exist. The paras prove that man made Climate Change is undeniable.
 
Yes it exists. Over here in northern Finland, it might actually be a beneficial thing though, for a while. We've had really warm winters and warm summers now for past few years.
 
Yes it exists. Over here in northern Finland, it might actually be a beneficial thing though, for a while. We've had really warm winters and warm summers now for past few years.
8EISPSl.png


In one scenario, ya fine. Just that the rest of Eurasia will be camped outside of your fortified borders as vassal states.
 
Back
Top