Police Officer forces a woman to give him a handjob.

cogar66

Still Mildly Glowing
No one disputes that an on-duty Irvine police officer got an erection and ejaculated on a motorist during an early-morning traffic stop in Laguna Beach. The female driver reported it, DNA testing confirmed it and officer David Alex Park finally admitted it... "She got what she wanted," said Stokke. "She's an overtly sexual person."

A jury of one woman and 11 men—many white and in their 50s or 60s—agreed with Stokke. On Feb. 2, after a half-day of deliberations, they found Park not guilty of three felony charges that he'd used his badge to win sexual favors during the December 2004 traffic stop.

This is an old story, but still it's bullshit. Discuss.

Story here: http://www.ocweekly.com/2007-02-08/news/illegally-park-ed/
 
the cop is a bastard of course, but I doubt the stripper is anything but a saint. Of couse, the court was wrong, and this is clearly a demonstration of how sexist american society is and how prejudice still drive their thoughts. And then, they come and argue how Muslims treat their womans. lol

But, as I said, I don't really fell pity for her. If she refused to do a hand job for him at least... But she did it, and doesn't matter if it was for don't being fined or whatever, she did. I know plenty of womans who would'nt do a hand job in this case.
Maybe I am sexist too, but at least I know who's right in that history (the stripper).
 
Yeah, like Brazil is any better. Sexism is everywhere. Quit going around and posting anti-American shit for the Hell of it.
 
I can say I never saw anything like that in Brazil at least

And stop posting "like Brazil is any better" whenever you receive a critic from a Brazilian, please. Show me some source of how Brazil is worse, then we may argue.
 
OakTable said:
Yeah, like Brazil is any better. Sexism is everywhere. Quit going around and posting anti-American shit for the Hell of it.

What are you talking about, this is an anti-Government post if anything.
 
I'm not sure that it shows how sexist Americans are, I'd say it more shows how much Americans, in this case particularly men, consider sexual encounters with a stripper her fault. Clearly the prosecutor fucked up with the jury selection. Anyway, it should be overturned in an appeal because that's clearly ridiculous, the cop was stalking strippers to get them to get him off.
 
cogar66 said:
OakTable said:
Yeah, like Brazil is any better. Sexism is everywhere. Quit going around and posting anti-American shit for the Hell of it.

What are you talking about, this is an anti-Government post if anything.

how is that about anti government? The judiciary was clearly influenced by how the mind of the Americans dealing with the case worked, so its about the society, to specify more, about the American Society, since thats where it happened.

UncannyGarlic said:
I'm not sure that it shows how sexist Americans are, I'd say it more shows how much Americans, in this case particularly men, consider sexual encounters with a stripper her fault.

Yeah, agree with that, probably thats more what I wanted to say.
 
Radiated Heinz said:
how is that about anti government? The judiciary was clearly influenced by how the mind of the Americans dealing with the case worked, so its about the society, to specify more, about the American Society, since thats where it happened.
Indeed, it highlights a problem with some folks in American society, the people who, like the jury of random shmoes, would excuse the cops behavior. It might be anti-jury or anti-cop but I don't see anything government about it. That all said, we didn't hear the court case so it's possible that the prosecutor was incompetent and the defense extremely competent, but I'm doubtful.

I'm not a fan of witnesses, I prefer hard evidence and there seems to be enough here to sink the cop, even ignoring what the stripper said happened and the possibility of a bad prosecution, so it's fucked up.

It's asshole cops like this who always make me wish that more money could be directed to police departments solely for IA divisions. It also makes me wish that police departments had stricter screenings (and one of many reasons (not the main one) why I hate the idea of electing sheriffs).
 
Radiated Heinz said:
cogar66 said:
OakTable said:
Yeah, like Brazil is any better. Sexism is everywhere. Quit going around and posting anti-American shit for the Hell of it.

What are you talking about, this is an anti-Government post if anything.

how is that about anti government? The judiciary was clearly influenced by how the mind of the Americans dealing with the case worked, so its about the society, to specify more, about the American Society, since thats where it happened.

I was talking about this post. It's anti-Government and it's against Capitalist society. Without Capitalism the jury would most likely not be such idiots because the media wouldn't have brainwashed them into honestly believing that someone who is a stripper most likely because she has to be due to economic circumstance was "asking for it". It's also anti-Government because without a Government the cop wouldn't have the power to do this shit. Also, the whole "WHY DO YOU HATE AMERICA@!#@@#@#$@?$?$?" bitch whine from the right is extremely annoying. They don't seem to understand hating America's government doesn't equate with hating the people.
 
without government, (right now, not in the utopia society which we don't live, case you haven't noticed it), there wouldn't be a judicial court, and this stripper would be in a far worse condition if she were sexually abused by any other men and then society probably would not have cared about this stripper. If society cared, the chances of a more primitive and instinctual attitude towards either the stripper, or the person who abused her would be pretty higher, turning the 'judgment' unfair.

cogar66 said:
Without Capitalism the jury would most likely not be such idiots because the media wouldn't have brainwashed

people were brainwashed before capitalism and media exists, you know.
 
Radiated Heinz said:
without government, (right now, not in the utopia society which we don't live, case you haven't noticed it), there wouldn't be a judicial court, and this stripper would be in a far worse condition if she were sexually abused by any other men and then society probably would not have cared about this stripper. If society cared, the chances of a more primitive and instinctual attitude towards either the stripper, or the person who abused her would be pretty higher, turning the 'judgment' unfair.

cogar66 said:
Without Capitalism the jury would most likely not be such idiots because the media wouldn't have brainwashed

people were brainwashed before capitalism and media exists, you know.

Ah ANARCHY! PEOPLE WOULD DIE IN THE STREETS! WE'D ALL HAVE MOHAWKS AND RIDE ON ARMORED MOTORCYCLES!
Also, brainwashing always comes from authority, remove authority, remove brainwashing.
 
sorry, but I have a pretty good view of what anarchy is, don't underestimate people, please.

if you think that overthrowing all the governments right now, making people do decisions by themselves, forgetting centuries of manipulation, nationalism, religions, and 'brainwashing' would bring anything different of "PEOPLE WOULD DIE IN THE STREETS", you are wrong, as that would be exactly what would happen.

If you want a real anarchist society, educate the society first. And sorry, but the only 'institutions' who can educate the masses right now are the capitalists goverments.

cogar66 said:
Ah ANARCHY! PEOPLE WOULD DIE IN THE STREETS! WE'D ALL HAVE MOHAWKS AND RIDE ON ARMORED MOTORCYCLES!

I lol'd hard
 
You have a lot of gross and unfounded generalizations going there. First off, you're equating a corrupt cop, who was fired over the incident, with the entire government. You then equate people's ignorance with "brainwashing" by the media and capitalism, the former of which does play some role but the source of the ignorance is a lack of education, because people are unwilling to pay more taxes to improve schools. You also assume that there would be no brainwashing without the media, which is demonstrably false, look at the effect of religion on people before modern media were developed? Particularly in Europe, religion was more powerful than governments in regards to influence over the populace. As long as you have language, you have cons.

EDIT:
cogar66 said:
Also, brainwashing always comes from authority, remove authority, remove brainwashing.
Conmen "brainwash" people all the time without and real authority. Also, how the hell do you expect a society to function without any sort of authority? You do realize that what your using to communicate right now exists because of authority, right? You also realize that pure capitalism would have no authority, right?
 
anarchists rarely realize these things. Nowadays anarchists mostly realizes there is a evil to be eradicated from the world, and this evil is government. They don't really care or really think profoundly what they'll do after they overthrown the government.

(I am not directing this post to you cogar, I am saying only that most of punks and anarchists nowadays apparently think like that),
 
My favorite is the anarchists around here who organized and set up rules for their rallies/marches since the hobo capital of the world was getting fed up with their shit. Now they organize meet dates and times and have rules for the rallies. Even 4chan has rules and will ban you for violating them, not even anarchists want true anarchy.
 
I think it's pathetic.

Shows a certain weakness on the officer's part. Come to think of it, it shows a weakness that persists in all men, me included.


Sex.


Can't deny it, it is what all men generally have burned in their brain.

It's something that can't be helped, but something that can be dealt with in a morally and socially acceptable kind of way. Their are plenty of ways to satiate this need. This incident and incidents like this just shows a lack of discipline, motivation or knowledge. Or even pure moral depravity.


Either way, it's pathetic. Even more so since this is an officer, someone who's supposed to be just, fair and uphold the law.

My two cents: fire him and chemically castrate him for half a year or so.

P.S. Don't even get me started on rapists. I tend to refer to medieval torture and execution as a solution to those 'incidents'.
 
maybe its a shock for you ... but truth is females engange in sex jus as much like males do ;)

And they definetly get just as much enjoyment out of it. It's a urban myth that only "males" would be the bad guys and such which never can get enough from sex :roll:
 
Crni Vuk said:
maybe its a shock for you ... but truth is females engange in sex jus as much like males do ;)

And they definetly get just as much enjoyment out of it. It's a urban myth that only "males" would be the bad guys and such which never can get enough from sex :roll:

I never said that women have less of a sex-drive.

It is a fact however, that they are less likely to act on it. Or at least, less likely to act stupid on it.



And stop making ignorant assumptions Crni Vuk.
 
Back
Top