Previews and Ausir interview

I think the reason most of us aren't showing our hatred as much is because we have simply given up on seeing a true fallout. I for one will be happy if New Vegas is decent...It may not be an equal of the originals but at least its heading in the right direction, and who knows, maybe if the sales are good bethesda will wake up and realize that making an rpg is a good thing to try as opposed to the hybrid fps rpg turds they usually release
not likely tho
 
WorstUsernameEver said:
This reputation system is one of the big new features in Fallout New Vegas, feeding into the game's overarching struggle between the uptight authority figures of the New Californian Republic and the slaver army of Ceaser's Legion. You'll have to be careful who you side with, as each choice can have far reaching implications. Aligning yourself with one group will automatically create tensions with their rivals, the strength of feeling ramping up as your ties grow. Choose to follow one path exclusively and eventually the opposing faction will shoot on sight and you'll be locked out of their missions.

Despite what their names may suggest, aligning yourself with each faction isn't just a straight choice between good and evil. In Fallout: New Vegas the boundaries are far more blurred than that. Along the way you'll encounter all kinds of murky moral decisions. You can even choose to play one faction off against the other. It promises to be far more complex than Fallout 3's binary karma system.</blockquote>
Reputations, karma, influence and god knows what else in most cases end up being slightly retarded at best. I would appreciate some form of reputation that i never know about, that it may not apply to every situation etc. I hope they make it good, but i wouldn't hold my breath.

So I took a stealthy approach to taking back the prison and eliminated every enemy in my path one by one, until I reached the top of the broken down roller coaster. Once I got here I brought back out my grenade machinegun and rained down explosives onto the facility. The poor cons didn’t stand a chance against the hellfire that was being brought down upon them. Once I took care of all the inmates I returned to the Brother of Steel and let him know that the facility was officially under control.
So, how would someone call an approach of sneaking in without killing anyone until you find the leader or whatever? I have no problem with violence, i almost never go the sneaky way, but honestly? Dealing with foes one at a time and then bombing them from high ground is something i would call tactics, not stealth!

About the whole wikipedia... yes it receives blind hate a lot. If i am not doing an academic research and I just want to find something about let's say an animal, I'll just wiki it! I do not need to search all the encyclopedias I have every time i just want to find something specific. When it is about a research, a university or your work, then yes, don't use the wikipedia, at least not exclusively
 
Arden said:
With my remark about GGoH and the following rant i was refering to the (for me) rather confusing appearance that while FO3 was widely (though not exclusively) regarded on this site as a not so good/bad/very bad/retarded sequel to the series, FO:NV seems to be rather well recieved (generally of course, with exceptions like alec. And there are a lot of people with reservations). But there was no real change! Same engine, same gameplay. Things that were rightly criticised in the transition from FO2 to FO3 by a lot of people are now accepted as fact. If someone remarks that the friggin game is still a half-assed ego-shooter no matter what obsidian does to save what they can, its just "annoying nitpicking". I heard that one before, amongst others by people who made the GGoH-remarks.

FO3 was worthy of my hate back in 2008 and i dont see fundamental changes to FO:NV (like TB-Combat, Isometric wiew), so its worthy of my hate now. Im still glittering you dullards! :twisted:

In keeping with the culinary metaphor tradition of NMA...

I ate a really tasty burger once. It was a perfect burger. Then, a year later I ate a new burger. It tasted almost the same, but was a bit too heavy on mayonnaise.

Then, years later, I learned that a third burger was being made! It looked different and was made with a different kind of meat and bread, but essentially, it was the same burger and everything looked as if the burger was like the first burger I ate.

Then, the burger joint went bankrupt. I was sad.

Years later, a hot dog company bought the burger recipe. They've made their own version, but instead of making a burger, they made a hot dog, because they weren't good at making burgers. The hot dog was decent, but only the smell was left of that burger I loved.

Then a different company was hired to make a new hot dog in the vein of the burger I loved. Now, it's still a hot dog, but it smells, tastes and feels like that burger I loved.

At this point, instead of crying about the burgers long lost, I decided to love the new hot dog that tastes and smells like the burger I loved.

tl;dr: Fallout New Vegas is the closest thing we're going to get to a proper Fallout 1/2 sequel. Plus, it's being done by people who know how to design games and know their Fallout (even if some consider their design choices controversial).
 
Tagaziel said:
In keeping with the culinary metaphor tradition of NMA...

I ate a really tasty burger once. It was a perfect burger. Then, a year later I ate a new burger. It tasted almost the same, but was a bit too heavy on mayonnaise.

Then, years later, I learned that a third burger was being made! It looked different and was made with a different kind of meat and bread, but essentially, it was the same burger and everything looked as if the burger was like the first burger I ate.

Then, the burger joint went bankrupt. I was sad.

Years later, a hot dog company bought the burger recipe. They've made their own version, but instead of making a burger, they made a hot dog, because they weren't good at making burgers. The hot dog was decent, but only the smell was left of that burger I loved.

Then a different company was hired to make a new hot dog in the vein of the burger I loved. Now, it's still a hot dog, but it smells, tastes and feels like that burger I loved.

At this point, instead of crying about the burgers long lost, I decided to love the new hot dog that tastes and smells like the burger I loved.

tl;dr: Fallout New Vegas is the closest thing we're going to get to a proper Fallout 1/2 sequel. Plus, it's being done by people who know how to design games and know their Fallout (even if some consider their design choices controversial).
How sad...

I once had a burger too, and it was awesome. But when the company went bust, and the hotdog company tried to shove their hotdogs down my throat, I started eating proper food. Pork cutlets, steak and so on.

I think eating junk food just because it remotely resembles proper food is bad practice. And you're wasting your eating, you know? When, years later, you finally find a proper dish, you'll get stomachburns and so on, and you'll only be able to eat boiled fish with pasta... Or some boring old food like that.
 
WorstUsernameEver said:
The thing is, Maxson II was what I called the guy in The Vault because there was no canonical first name given for him anywhere in the games. Instead of giving him an actual name, the devs simply copied the name of the article - "Maxson II" - assuming that it's canon.</blockquote>

Hah, wait now.

Wouldn't that mean that you had a hand in writing for Fallout 3 / they stole your idea without asking?

;)
 
tekhedd said:
Aphyosis said:
I never understood the hate Wiki gets. I can understand the stigmata surrounding a information source anyone can edit but...

I really hope you meant to say "stigma." If wikipedia starts spontaneously bleeding from my screen, I'm going to totally freak out.

Yeah, i did. To be honest I'm not sure why i spelt it how i did = /

Still, i was referring more to the perceived inaccuracies i see people complaining about. Can't give you citation for that, i just see someone on a forum every few months say it's not credible.

I hadn't considered academic implementations, which make sense.
 
Back
Top