Damn. It's the second time in this thread recently that i get this freaking error when trying to post: the quotes break the forum wide as if i had posted a pic of
gigantinormous resolution... have anyone else ever got this problem, or is it something on my end?
@
Continuum
- "Introduction", let's see, you wrote: "
Yeah, yeah, yeah, every piece of graphics I made is a cheap rip from other games, or is
reference to something. I haven't realized that until now. Thanks
for opening my eyes (...)"
Well, as far as disconected introductions to an argument, this one
had a bit of a sarcastic drama jab, wouldn't you say? No matter.
- Since nobody else seemed to care about it and some people
seem to have starting taking offense in my opinion about the
ripping stuff, i'll agree that arguing against it seems pointless...
@
Demonslayer
About the location of centaurs/floaters ancounters; I don't think this is the case. In various FO2 playthroughs (including the whole lot of grinding i made the last time i played)
i never had any centaurs and/or floaters random encounters happen at the northern or eastern areas of the map. Those encounters are concentrated on the regions
west of New Reno.
If you mean that they should be concentrated on a specific map or the 2 or 3 squares around them, otherwise they doesn't make sense, then i completely disagree: as long
as they have their general 'regions', it makes perfect sense that the herds of those beasts would roam from one place to the other in search for food or whatever and not be
tight together in the same place, especially several decades after their 'creation'.
@
Grayswandir
- "
Now you are being cheap."
Yeah, a little bit.
- "
I just wanted to prove my point of same graphic team. Some of the arts of arcanum is way more fallouty than the ones from fallout tactic btw."
That maybe so, but 1) it's still cheap
and 2) when the player recognizes the wall/scenery/item/critter/whatever as being from Arcanum (or 'x' game),
therefore working as a reference, and he/she is taken out of the FO setting into something completely different and unrelated, is it the same as still staying in the setting
when the stuff comes from another directly related game in the same setting (which does not make number 1 any less valid though)?
- Cats, they are all dead:
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Cat 
But of course, this is unimportant stuff if changed.
- "
And I were to make a mod in texas or new mexico, I'd use some of the revolvers too."
Are steampunk guns the same as retro-futuristic sci-fi ones? But of course, your mod your <s>mistakes</s> rules.
- "
No please don't! If it comes from F3, it HAS to look bad right? right?"
Who said that? (it sounds like something an FO3 'champion' would say in the news section or something). No, in fact it looks good, but that's not really the point.
In that look it's also a bit unnecesary imo, and i would certainly not replace the original critters with it (not for a mod anyway, but perhaps for a re-make or something).
@
.Pixote.
- "
(...)but it’s cheap to just “borrow” critters from other games and drop them into Fallout (...)"
Although i wasn't originally talking about critters but about the topic of this thread which is tiles and scenery art, it applies to critters as well so,
thank you.
- "
can you link *The Extended Flamer Attack Mod* to the new critter front page…thanks."
You mean the Index at the new animations 2 thread? if so, sure.
EDIT: oh ffs...
I never called anyone cheap. I said that ripping stuff from other games is a cheap thing to do, and that mods are the cheaper and lesser for it. You may have bad taste when it comes to a specific dish because you like it, or made a dumb mistake in a situation, that doesn't mean that someone who point it out is intentionally calling you a tasteless fool or a retarded idiot. You could jump to that conclusion, but consider my unwillingness to do it myself in this thread a clear sign that i didn't actually do it. 
