joevonzombie
Buried alive in Golgotha
Sensationalist knitpicking. For one thing, he makes out like fallout 3's aesthetic is out of place in particular due to the time gap when fallout 2 got away with it being set a few decades before.
All of the inconsistencies with the plot that he points out hardly put a dent In the experience.
As an avid reader and occasional writer, when I was researching fo3 before playing it, I was intrigued by how most people either revered the story or despised it so much that it ruined the game.
When I first played the game completely, I could easily pick up on the plot holes as I do when reading or watching a movie or show, but I was easily able to shrug them off. People who mock fallout 3 for these reasons show a lack of ability to suspend disbelief, and honestly, I thought of Fallout 3 as an excellent Fallout title and an excellent game in general.
If people held all works to the standards they hold to Fallout 3, everything would suck.
Not quite. Complaining that Fallout 3's world, story, and characters do not make sense within the fictional universe it's supposed to be set in is not "nitpicking."
Fallout 3 is supposed to be a sequel to Fallout 2. In Fallout 2, it's established that a GECK can do a hell of a lot more than purify water, so why does James want to waste it on Project Purity? Look at Vault City, don't you think DC would be better off if they used it for its intended purpose?
Fallout 3 sucks in the gameplay department too, it's a RPG where character builds don't matter and your choices have no consequences or affect on the actual world... so it's not really a role playing game and for a FPS, the shooting mechanics are horrible and VATS is laughably broken.
All you have left is the exploration element, but there are so many wasted locations where there isn't anything to actually do. That element is ruined as well.
Last edited: