Walpknut
This ghoul has seen it all
Real or fake star wars fans, it doesn't matter, both follow shitty movies, bond around that, guys.
>>Yes.
I mean how would you know they wouldn't stop ripping into the movie if it was good? Like let's say right now they are being negative for the sake of being negative. But they took your remark to heart and became truly objective (suppose there were such a thing). If, in their objectivity, they had to bash a movie because it was objectively bad (not Solo), but you happened to enjoy that movie: How would you ever know they were objective?I think some of them (MauLer for example) are just being contrarian to get people to boycott Disney, and wouldn't stop ripping into the movie if it was the best thing since sliced bread.
You have no such obligation, that is true. But it sure sounds like you're trying to enforce one on someone else.I have no obligation to like or dislike any movie...
Should I now?? Well, goddammit! Why have I been so trusting of everything everyone has been telling me all these years? I'll be very careful from now on. I have seen the light. Thank you so much! Thank you, thank you, thank you! [You get this warm fuzzy feeling all the way down to your toes.]No. You should be suspicious of getting "review" information from a guy whose recent success is tied to just bashing any Star Wars movie that didn't receive fan approval.
There's two camps at the moment: People that like Star Wars and people that hate Star Wars. Then there's MauLer - he'll fly whichever flag gets him the most ad-sense bucks.
M-hm. So that's four camps then? Or am I not getting something again? Also, what camp/s do you and I belong in?I'm aware that there's a camp that doesn't like Solo for legitimate reasons.
Whoa, really?? I would have never thought of that. I'm glad you're here to tell us these things!Businesses doing business things. Hate to break it to you, but GL began milking the franchise the moment it was a commercial success way back when.
Oh yeah! How could I forget? Back in the day, GL totally bought Star Wars from Disney, after having nothing to do with creating it himself, only to milk it into the totally bankrupt franchise he sold them back a few years ago. Wow, what a cheat! So misbehavior. Much inclusive. Such hilarious! Thank God for Disney!The fact you think this behavior is exclusive to Disney is hilarious.
Yeah, that one wasn't meant for you personally, but rather for you in the plural, like "you all". Sorry (honest).I said one thing about MauLer and you've launched into this tirade...
Can you point me to the same definition of the term on any forum?Posting twice in a row on the same thread.
So what YouTube channels am I allowed to watch?
M-hm. So that's four camps then? Or am I not getting something again? Also, what camp/s do you and I belong in?
Whoa, really?? I would have never thought of that. I'm glad you're here to tell us these things!
Oh yeah! How could I forget? Back in the day, GL totally bought Star Wars from Disney, after having nothing to do with creating it himself, only to milk it into the totally bankrupt franchise he sold them back a few years ago. Wow, what a cheat! So misbehavior. Much inclusive. Such hilarious! Thank God for Disney!
GL profit from his own creativity... pff, what a dork. We don't do that here!
Then MauLer profit from Disney's fail... pff, what a dork. We don't do that either! Just learn the rules, idiots!
So. BFFs?
I can point you to the definition in this forum:Can you point me to the same definition of the term on any forum?
Yeah, the shape-explanation was totally pointless. The previous EU canon was totally happy with the YT1300 freighter being exactly that shape for whatever reason (one theory is that it was designed to also be a shipping container pusher/tug), no need to have that.I thought Solo was good. Much better than TLJ but not as good as Rogue One. I thought some of the explanations were unneeded considering that some are self explanatory. I.E. How Han gets his last name. The other one that sticks out to me right now is how the Millennium Falcon gets its iconic shape. Why not just have at that shape from the start? I did like how they showed Woody Harrelson's character break down his rifle into a pistol and gave it to Han. I think it's neat to show how long he's had the pistol and how powerful it really is since he never ditches it until his demise.
Yeah, the shape-explanation was totally pointless. The previous EU canon was totally happy with the YT1300 freighter being exactly that shape for whatever reason (one theory is that it was designed to also be a shipping container pusher/tug), no need to have that.
Does Lucas Arts employ people to keep track of current, canonical lore or is it just a cluster fuck? I know GRRM relies heavily on his own wikia to keep his stories consistent.