Sovz said:
It is not the business of Washington or London or Ottawa to decide whether they accept the election results in the Ukraine. It is for the sovereign Ukrainian institutions to solve the process through the proper and existing legislative process, namely an examination of the complaints by the supreme court and the subsequent publishing of the results.
Uh-huh. That really works well where it has been shown that intimidation, bribery and falsification were the rule in a lot of districts. In other words: no. The entire point of having such an organisation as the OVSE is to judge whether elections have gone democratically or not, and if they haven't, to then notify the world that that was not a democratically president.
After this, the new President will be announced. It is a simple, clear process and the Ukrainians are capable of solving their own problems without outside interference from the countries who are dying to install Yushchenko, no doubt so that lucrative arms contracts can be delivered to NATO and military bases set up on Russia's borders.
Oh, yes, obviously. I mean, with the country almost splitting intwine, Kuchma going to Russia for advice, Kuchma ignoring his parliaments decision that the elections were invalid, and even declaring that vote illegal, it is clear that they can all solve it by themselves.
Also, that last sentence is completely idiotic. This is not the cold war, the USA does not need military bases near Russia's borders at all, Russia is more or less a friend of the Western world even. If anything, the West wants the Ukraine to join it because, hey, the more the merrier. It has some economic advantages, but that doesn't mean it's a bad thing. Also note that Yanukovich is supported by Putin, is also largely under the influence of Russia and would take measures that would help Russia, not the Ukraine. Such things as dual-citizenship (handy for Russia's required military service).
Therefore the declaration by a number of western countries that they did not accept the result obtained by the Ukrainian Central Election Committee is ludicrous. What if the rest of the world tells the United States of America that it does not accept the result of the ballot in Ohio because it was rigged?
Then that would be it. Since when is it idiotic if an independent observer concludes fraud, and that then other countries declare that they do not accept those results? They're not forcing Ukraine to do anything, they are merely expressing their honest, and well-founded, opinions.
And who is Tony Blair to make any declarations, now that members of his own party wish to impeach him for gross misconduct in leading the country into an illegal act of butchery in Iraq baced on barefaced lies?
So completely and utterly besides the point. Tony Blair was elected in a fair, democratic process. Whether that was good is a second thing, but this has jack shit to do with his saying that the Ukraine election results are not valid.
The strongarm tactics used by the western stooge, Yushchenko, are typical of the anti-democratic processes set in motion by a rampant and militant Washington, crushed in the grip on a monetarist, neo-conservative crypto-fascist clique of elitists, whose corporate greed speaks louder than the mores of internacional diplomacy and whose thirst to dominate the
world's resources in the lifetimes of Rumsfeld and Cheney throws any moral concept into the trash bin.
Jesus fucking Christ could you have typed a sentence with more bullshit in it than this? "strongarm tactics"(What strongarm tactics?) "western stooge"(Western stooge because he thinks what a large part of the Ukrainian population thinks, and he's the only one who isn't under the spell of Putin?), "typical of anti-democratic processes"(Observing fraud, and then declaring the elections false because of fraud is anti-democratic, how?), "Washington" has, by the way, nothing to do with this, since the OVSE is not an American institution.
Yushchenko himself has set himself up as the worst type of unprofessional clown playing the fool in public. His "swearing in" ceremony in a parliament without a quorum was as classic a case of his foolishness as has ever been seen. Why didn't he place a piece of parsley over each ear and stick an apple in his mouth, and claim he was a pig, as well?
It was an act to show, yet again, that he doesn't agree with the results. What's your problem with that?
Playing this type of childish game gives Yushchenko as much authority as a drunken down-and-out, lying on the floor of a public latrine in a pool of urine, with a bottle by his side, saying he is the president, that he is a doctor, that he is also a cosmonaut on Thursday afternoons and if it hadn't been for Eltsin, he would also be God.
Next time, why doesn't Viktor Yushchenko wear a baseball cap and a skirt, with a plastic red nose and his face painted like the clown he is?
Oh, really, this is just too idiotic for words. You don't even say one thing, just one, about Yanukocivh, and you go off on a rant about Yuschenko looking like a fool, but not actually giving any reasons, facts or reasoning as to why this is so.