sorry, but does a the games that have numerous bug and serious issue with its engine, be it bad graphic or unoptimized one that couldn;'t handle more than 60 fps is the standard for modern AAA industry? i guess no, but some bethesda fan were seems to be trigger happy to defend it.
Huh, I didn't even know they made a 6th one. Sounds like a piece of shit.
Imagine if the XCOM reboot was never released and only The Bureau, that shitty 3rd person cover shooter.
If it's Fallout and it's a bad Fallout then it's a bad game.
Well for me there was only enough content to keep me going to level 8. That's where I decided I couldn't take anymore. Bethesdrones have been know to complain that the Mojave wasteland didn't feel like a wasteland. To those folks I submit that the commonwealth is devoid of any npc that actually holds a conversation or any truly good scripted quests and because of this it feels like the loneliest game I've ever played. That includes games like silent hill where you literally are basically alone. Or that time I played Mario party by myself. The commonwealth feels more Like purgatory than an actual wasteland.
I once thought this when I was desperate to find a reason for Fallout 4 to not be a total disappointment. But frankly, If you have to rename the game and pretend it's not even part of the franchise, then the game failed at what it was supposed to do and is by definition a bad game. Or at the very least, it's a very mediocre game.
Irwin John Finster said:
Do you know what part of the game that picture of Piper comes from? I don't remember her smoking at all.
Go look at Desdemona's face sometime. She's the leader of the Railroad and her face is so plastic looking I honestly think she's a synth.Well that we agree on, but mediocre doesn't equal bad.
Well, I don't know about that.
Let's compare FO4 to the Division, or to Black Ops 3, or to MGSV, or to Far Cry Primal, or to any other "AAA" title from last year/this year and see how it shapes up. In that regard it's just a fairly average big release.
You don't even need to use Witcher 3 as an example. Mass Effect 1's dialogue cutscenes had better animations than Fallout 4 and that game predates Fallout 3.you cant compare the graphic of new vegas to fallout 4 one, of course new vegas is a five year old games and obsidian that have no choice but to use shitty engine that bethesda gave them due their limited resource.
on the other hand, the AAA title like you mentioned have more superior graphic and engine quality.
should i uncork the name " witcher 3" anyone ?
you cant compare the graphic of new vegas to fallout 4 one, of course new vegas is a five year old games and obsidian that have no choice but to use shitty engine that bethesda gave them due their limited resource.
on the other hand, the AAA title like you mentioned have more superior graphic and engine quality.
should i uncork the name " witcher 3" anyone ?
The characters do look like last gen. they have some more shadows and are slightly improved, but fact is Fallout 4 is very much the same basic game engine as Fallout 3 and the same weird animations and facial expressions are obvious. Does it look slightly better? Yes. Does it look like 5-7 years better? Absolutely not.
when did i say that?
