FearMonkey
Vault Senior Citizen

Pretty hilarious and accurate.
IMO.
Some voice types just not appealing for reviews. I suffer from this too, so no youtube. But this one guy might benefit from having a bit more 'weight' in his voice. More mature. And more calm, the beginning of the video is a bit jumpscare.Sometimes there's nothing you can do about your own voice. I've tried. Mine sucks and there's nothing I can do about it.![]()
Some voice types just not appealing for reviews. I suffer from this too, so no youtube. But this one guy might benefit from having a bit more 'weight' in his voice. More mature. And more calm, the beginning of the video is a bit jumpscare.
Hated WAY more, because I saw exactly how good it could have been, had it been developed by a competent studio like Obsidian.I have a question for anyone who reads this. Does the existence of New Vegas make you enjoy Fallout 3 more or hate it more? Because for me it makes me like it more. It's like the Alpha/Beta version of New Vegas in a different environment with worse writing and it's filled with good and bad moments. By the way, just to make it clear, I played New Vegas before I played FO3, so I don't have any "nostalgia" bias for FO3 or anything like that.
Not sure how dissecting a game with horrendous writing, world-building, roleplay, and character development, and making completely valid and legitimate reasons why each of these factors were done poorly, is the equivalent to making it out to be a "Superman 64 tier abomination", but okay. No, I believe his approach is perfectly acceptable and makes sense.I think he's being too harsh just to join in with the crowd. He makes it out to be some Superman 64 tier abomination rather than just a dumb shallow open world game.
There's nothing bad with his voice, as long as he keeps being calm and pragmatic. My headphones exploded on his childish hysterical shrieks.Some voice types just not appealing for reviews.
Not sure how dissecting a game with horrendous writing, world-building, roleplay, and character development, and making completely valid and legitimate reasons why each of these factors were done poorly, is the equivalent to making it out to be a "Superman 64 tier abomination", but okay. No, I believe his approach is perfectly acceptable and makes sense.
But you never explained how he went "overboard"; and that was a statement, not an explanation.As I already explained quite clearly in my post, he goes overboard with it.
I have a question for anyone who reads this. Does the existence of New Vegas make you enjoy Fallout 3 more or hate it more? Because for me it makes me like it more. It's like the Alpha/Beta version of New Vegas in a different environment with worse writing and it's filled with good and bad moments. By the way, just to make it clear, I played New Vegas before I played FO3, so I don't have any "nostalgia" bias for FO3 or anything like that.