Anyone noticed Legion supporters usually spell Caesar wrong?

Putting your brahmin in front of the scariest motherfucker in the Legion is just asking for something bad to happen to you.
 
Sicknessoverload said:
I wonder if Legion supporters have heard the saying "All empires fall"
Click to expand...
Yes and this is something that both Marcus and Mr House tell you about another drawback of the Legion is that Caesar men follow the man and not his ideals. When he is gone his empire will crumble. Look at what happened to the Roman Empire after Augustus died. There was decades of political unrest and insatiability that eventually cumulated to a Civil War and a year known as "The Year of Four Emperors" and the end of the Julio-Claudian line.
 
RangerBoo said:
Yes and this is something that both Marcus and Mr House tell you about another drawback of the Legion is that Caesar men follow the man and not his ideals. When he is gone his empire will crumble. Look at what happened to the Roman Empire after Augustus died. There was decades of political unrest and insatiability that eventually cumulated to a Civil War and a year known as "The Year of Four Emperors" and the end of the Julio-Claudian line.
Click to expand...
I actually think people need to stop taking this as gospel. If you beat the game supporting the Legion Caesar is constantly grooming you and boosting your ego, and at the end there's a coin minted in your honor, something that only Calhoun, Graham, and Caesar have. I think that he plans on making the courier the next emporeor.
 
If any of the factions were the perfect choice with no drawbacks, it would be boring as shit since it would be the obvious choice. So, no shit, the Legion has drawbacks, that's the entire point. Same for all the other factions.
 
Sicknessoverload said:
Have any of you noticed that when someone supports the Legion, they usually spell Caesar as Ceaser or Ceaser. I think Legion supporters are either edgy or stupid.
Click to expand...
Do you have any of your Sonic OCs to share with the rest of the class while we are on this subject?
 
The world of Fallout is suppose to be morally grey. Sure, you may have killed the evil raider warlord who was harassing a large portion of the wasteland but what if he and his raider band were keeping another more dangerous threat at bay. You killing him means that the new and more dangerous raider band will now have free reign. Also, you may have killed the evil tyrant but that tyrant kept law and order in his realm. Not only that but he made sure that the water purifiers were up and running and that his subjects were well feed and safe. Without him there will be chaos and disorder with people going thirsty and hungry making the people wish that the evil tyrant was alive and back in charge. This is what made Fallout fun as it required you think before you took action and weigh the pros and the cons.
 
RangerBoo said:
The world of Fallout is suppose to be morally grey. Sure, you may have killed the evil raider warlord who was harassing a large portion of the wasteland but what if he and his raider band were keeping another more dangerous threat at bay. You killing him means that the new and more dangerous raider band will now have free reign. Also, you may have killed the evil tyrant but that tyrant kept law and order in his realm. Not only that but he made sure that the water purifiers were up and running and that his subjects were well feed and safe. Without him there will be chaos and disorder with people going thirsty and hungry making the people wish that the evil tyrant was alive and back in charge. This is what made Fallout fun as it required you think before you took action and weigh the pros and the cons.
Click to expand...


I would argue the Legion themselves as a faction aren't really morally grey. "safe roads" is, realistically, such a drop in the bucket by comparison to their mountain of evil actions and the repulsiveness of their even their basic structure of operation.

The Legion needed more development not to make them more grey but to make them have more depth and understandability. It may sound like an arbitrary difference, but it's there.

Counterproductive as it might sound, I actually think the Legion being a well fleshed out morally repugnant regime makes NV more fleshed out and believable in itself
 
RangerBoo said:
The world of Fallout is suppose to be morally grey. Sure, you may have killed the evil raider warlord who was harassing a large portion of the wasteland but what if he and his raider band were keeping another more dangerous threat at bay. You killing him means that the new and more dangerous raider band will now have free reign. Also, you may have killed the evil tyrant but that tyrant kept law and order in his realm. Not only that but he made sure that the water purifiers were up and running and that his subjects were well feed and safe. Without him there will be chaos and disorder with people going thirsty and hungry making the people wish that the evil tyrant was alive and back in charge. This is what made Fallout fun as it required you think before you took action and weigh the pros and the cons.
Click to expand...
Well, I could just wipe out the second raider gang, and the Legion falling apart would take years, I'm sure people would start evacuating to NCR or the Mojave.
 
Atomic Postman said:
I would argue the Legion themselves as a faction aren't really morally grey. "safe roads" is, realistically, such a drop in the bucket by comparison to their mountain of evil actions and the repulsiveness of their even their basic structure of operation.

The Legion needed more development not to make them more grey but to make them have more depth and understandability. It may sound like an arbitrary difference, but it's there.

Counterproductive as it might sound, I actually think the Legion being a well fleshed out morally repugnant regime makes NV more fleshed out and believable in itself
Click to expand...
I think morally grey Legion is an oxymoron lol
 
Legion putz's are just dedicated memers kinda like people who ask you to prove the Earth is round. It makes for good discussion and entertainment on the forum so they are the unsung heros really. Imagine if there were no Legion supporters how boring it would be.

Also, they spell it wrong because a dirty barbarian can only larp as Rome and get despotism out of it as opposed to the true republic. The empire never ended. The NCR will prevail in body and in spirt long after the body has paseed. Just as Rome did.
 
Atomic Postman said:
I would argue the Legion themselves as a faction aren't really morally grey. "safe roads" is, realistically, such a drop in the bucket by comparison to their mountain of evil actions and the repulsiveness of their even their basic structure of operation.

The Legion needed more development not to make them more grey but to make them have more depth and understandability. It may sound like an arbitrary difference, but it's there.

Counterproductive as it might sound, I actually think the Legion being a well fleshed out morally repugnant regime makes NV more fleshed out and believable in itself
Click to expand...
This is why I have stated many times that I view the Legion as being "Lawful Evil" while the NCR I see as "Lawful Neutral". Caesar actually reminds me a lot of Asmodeus from D&D. Like Asmodeus, Caesar truly believes that a bright future awaits the world if he was in charge. As arrogant as this claim sounds, Caesar, much like Asmodeus, does have the competence to back it up. Which to me makes him a much more fun and interesting villain. Way better then Eden in Fallout 3 or Father in Fallout 4.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top