See, the US keeps WORLD PEACE as it allows the whole world to prosper. Obviously.
That's such an egozentric world view that I can't leave this uncommented. - I thought you're US American. So you're a Canadian? Eh. My bad.
I thought you have good education in the US? I understand somewhat that most citizens view their nation like as it would be the only existing entity on this planet and thinking very highly about themself and their nation, we all live in our own little bubbles and I guess Americans do have a good reason to think highly of them self in some aspects beeing a democracy, winning two world wars and creating one of the largest economies on this planet. But the idea that the US keps the World Peace allowing the whole world to prosper, or that it's even the reason for world peace in the first place?
Oh well. First, we havn't reached world peace, yet. We might be on our way to it, but it's far from secure. We could end up in a new world war or seeing larger conflicts coming up in the future, particularly if the predictions with the climate crysis happen to be true. Even the Pentagon is seeing this as a potentiall for new conflicts and trying to develope strategies and tactics on how to deal with it, an increase in climate refugees might destabilize whole regions as it has the potential to create one of the largest refugee crysis we've ever seen. A climate crysis that's mainly caused by western industrialisation and economies by the way. I would say the fact that we enjoyed peace for such a long time, had more to do with the experiences from WW2 - mainly that Europe got finally their shit together, overcoming this fucked up idea of being colonial powers and engaging in endless and pitty conflicts over a little border someone once draw on a map - and the existance of nuclear weapons was , which make wars a very risky endeavour, if the other side has a way to completely anihilate you, you might think twice about bombing the shit out of them. The idea, that Americans would be the better people in that respect, is ludicrous though. There are enough quotes and historical examples of US interventionalism and puting US interests over dimplomacy or peacy treaties and the well beeing of other nations. The US was definetly not some kind of inhumane dictatorship like the Soviet Union and it is a great place to live, compared to like 60% of the world. But, the US ledaership had no qualms of seeking confrontations and escalations, particularly with another Superpower like the Sovietunion even approving of wars and supporting dictatorships in all corners of the world (they still do, when ever it suits their interests). There are enough quotes by characters like Curtis LeMay, I quote "If 2 Americans and 1 Russian survive I consider this a victory", or "
Oil is much
too important a commodity to be
left in the hands of Arabs" by Henry A. Kissinger and let us not even get into the whole Vietnam War and Nixons Mad Man theory expanding the war to neighbouring countries, which proably killed countless of Cambodians and leaving the nation in ruins. Or do you seriously believe that middle east is a better place today due to US interventions?
Seriously, I understand US patriotism, I really do, but there is fine and thin line between patriotism (My country can do better) and nationalism (My country can do no wrong!).
Most people today, see the US as the largest threat to world peace and like a bully in a school yard. And there is definetly a (good) reason for that. And yes, we get it China, Russia and pretty much any other other nation is just as bad, often worse. But that's whataboutism.
I don't know I am not American and have stated so many times, I just don't look at them with the bias others do and am thankful for the peace they have brought upon the world for the most part. I left that American hating when I left my 20's and grew up.
Even at there worst they are better then most.
Oh? You definetly sounded like an American there. Anyway. My bad for making that assumption. However, looking at historical facts and human nature, is not a 'bias'. The US is a superpower and that means it also acts like one. Plane and simple. You can ask almost anyone in South America, the middle east or the Balkan about their opinion on it. We can also look at the very agressive NATO expansion that's a real threat to stability. Obviously that's not the fault of a single american and I don't blame them for the shitty policy of their leaders. But we shouldn't bullshit our selfs here at least.
If you have, as you say, a really unbiased view on it, then you must acknowledge the fact that you do have political groups in the US with a keen interst in keeping the US in power, at all cost. Or are you one of those people who believe Russia was the only bad guy in Ukraine? The side Europe and the US supported for years, are literal Nazis, they make our right wingers look like fucking children.
Gonzo
Hey I am not saying we haven't fucked up. All the shit in S. America, ME, etc. Keep in mind however it was a necessary evil as we had to keep up with the Soviets. The Soviets were getting big so we had to get big as well. The Soviets started installing communist allies and we installed freedum allies.
Over all though, thanks to having the U.S. and the SU, we haven't had a World War since. Having two big hegemons helps a lot as look what happened when the Roman Empire fell. All of a sudden you had all these countries who got free and started mass murdering eachother for the next 600 years or so. Sorry Euros, you folks really fucked up world peace on that one.
Dictatorships, you mean dictatorships. That's what your leadership usually installed, and quite often for no reason - like in South America where the Soviet presence was almost non existant before the US decieded to get involved - the Soviets made the same mistake in Africa though.
Ah well, I am curious how many wars in history have been started as 'pre-emtive' strike against the enemy. You see! We had to cause those civil wars/destablisation/fucking-up-of-economies/assasinations/etc. cuz Soviets! And what's the excuse today? Bin Laden? Putin? Do you see where this kind of thinking is leading you? A never ending cycle of justifications for military interventions which not only cost the lives of others but also the lives of americans and quote often you're not gaining any security. The support of the Iranian dictatorship lead to an Islamic revolution, Sadam who was massively supported by the US in Iraq became one of their enemies later. And there are countless of more examples where this policy of your government simply became a boomerang later. But hey, at least you wasted billions of dollars and countless of lives, so that companies like Halliburton or Boeing can make one more buck! It's also interesting how often it happens that characters/politicans like Dick Cheney end up to have a seat in the management of defence contractors or beeing somehow financially affiliated with them.
I am saying all Countries have a dark side and you didn't fight off shit, you surrendered to the Russians and let the Germans get away. I am saying that I can bet you used torture during your wars and you totally fought dirty as well. I am saying your country has innocent blood on its hand as well or did you fight all your wars with zero civilian causalities?
Just to say this, many US companies had very close ties to Germany before 1939, and even for some time into the war. So close, that even the President of the US saw a need to speak about it at some point, that this might come back to hurt them. Germany was supplied for years with very crucial resources for their military expansions by US Oil companies, like the antiknock agent tetraethyl, without it the Luftwaffe would have been pretty much grounded, this continued even after 1939 trough third party companies, till 1941 when Germany was in war with the US.
You can also look up IBMs involvement in the Holocaust or why Ford received a promotion by Hitler himself.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/secret-history-the-u-s-supported-and-inspired-the-nazis/5439236