Cro-Report!

Big T said:
Also of note, in 1991 the Conservatives were still in power (in the UK I mean) and we were just coming out of Thatcherism.
I shudder to think how we would have acted had it happened a year or two earlier.
Actually, it probably wouldn't have been much different. Great Britain has traditionally held Serbia's side in foreign policies, since before World War I. Damage Britain has done to Croatia during the the 20th century is too big to be expressed in words, starting with the notorious London Treaty from 1915 in which UK and France promised the entire Croatian coast to Italy (Our coast, which they had absolutely no authority over! What's worst, they kept their promise!) in exchange for Italy switching sides, over the excessive and completely unnecessary bombardment of Zadar in World War II (an atrocity comparable with the much more known bombardment of Dresden), all the way to their latest schenanigans (POA aren't the only ones spying on Croatian media - a group of investigative journalists recently cracked an illegal MI5 cell that was apparently dispatched by London to plant evidence on our government's involvement in hiding of Hague fugitive Ante Gotovina, with the sole goal of keeping us out of EU). Situation is similar with France, though France has lately been considerably more outgoing to Croatia, mainly because we chose not to side with USA, UK and their coalition in the War for Oil. However, I will never forget what chief of French diplomacy, Roland Dumas, stated in September 1991, when Serbian tanks were advancing throughout Croatia, systematically annihilating villages and killing hundreds of civilians. "This is a very interesting laboratory", he said. A laboratory? A laboratory for what? For experimenting how many children you can kill or how many churches you can burn down within one day? Bastard.

I would, however, protest about you equating the UN with "France and UK", but I don't want to get into it as my knowledge of the time/events is severely limited.
It wasn't not just about UK and France. In 1990 and 1991 everyone was against Croatia. If I had to point out a single foreign official who is most responsible for the Croatian tragedy, it would be the American Secretary of State James Baker. Only days before Serbian forces began their bloody rampage in Croatia, the said official in administration of Bush Sr. visited Belgrade and stated that USA recognizes legitimacy of the (then already phantomic) Yugoslavia and doesn't support "one-sided acts" (referring to Croatia's intent to secede from Yugoslavia). Thus he basically gave green light to Serbian invasion of Croatia. Milosevic took the hint, and a few days later Croatia was burning.
 
Bloody hell.
I have absolutely no reply to that.
This is all news to me.

And I thought most of our "Hidden History" was from the old Empire days in the colonies.

Sorry man.
 
I gotta agree, Im also ashamed that the US didnt help out more than it did.


Quite a few of the US servicemen Ive talked to that were over there were quite possed at how limited their options at stoping violence (more accurately, killing the people doing the violence) were by politics.
 
Ratty, Croatia did'nt exsist in WWI, it was all Hapsburg territory, what are you talking about? Croatia was, no offence, but meat to be traded between Empires. Anyway, they had fairly legitimate claims on parts of Croatia, as Dalmatia had spent as much time under the yoke of the Venetian Republic as the Hapsburgs.

Kept their promise? Post war Yugoslavia had the Dalmatian coast save Zadar. I'd say the worst thing was the creation of Yugoslavia itself, as a kind of unwanted Pax Illyria (Serbia+ in realirt), but hey, maybe that's me.

Comparing Zadar to Dresden is unfounded. Zadar was one of the most heavily foritfied cities in Europe, Dresden did nothing in the war but look pretty.

Roland Dumas was stupid. But to be fair, we did get involved in Bosnia, when the French refused to help.
 
ConstipatedCraprunner said:
Ratty, Croatia did'nt exsist in WWI, it was all Hapsburg territory, what are you talking about? Croatia was, no offence, but meat to be traded between Empires. Anyway, they had fairly legitimate claims on parts of Croatia, as Dalmatia had spent as much time under the yoke of the Venetian Republic as the Hapsburgs.
Wrong. Bohemia was a Habsburg province. Bosnia was a Habsburg province. Crain was a Habsburg province. Croatia, on the other hand, was a country with its own parliament, governor, standing army and most other elements of statehood, but sharing its sovereignity with Austria and Hungary. In 1527 an assembly of Croatian nobles elected of their own free will the Habsburg monarch to be the king of Triunal Kingdom of Croatia, Slavonia and Dalmatia. Istria and most of Dalmatia had been in Venetian hands since 1409, when Ladislas of Naples illegitimately sold his "rights" on Dalmatia to Veneto for a relatively meager sum of 100,000 golden ducats. When Veneto fell in 1797, Napoleon traded Dalmatia to Austria in exchange for Belgium (I don't get how such a shitty country can be considered of equal value as one Dalmatia :) ). When he conquered it again several years later, Dalmatia became part of his "Illyrian provinces", where it remained until the end of his reign. Afterwards, Dalmatia and Istria where officially returned to Croatia, but Austria unilaterally established her military governor there, and through most of 19th century Croatian government had no control over these two provinces. Note that there isn't a single historical document of any reasonable value that states Dalmatia and Istria aren't constitutive regions of Croatia. Historical, ethnic and political belonging of the eastern Adriatic coast to Croatia cannot be disputed and territorial pretensions of Italy are therefore illegal.

Kept their promise? Post war Yugoslavia had the Dalmatian coast save Zadar.
Partially true. Besides Zadar, Italy also got all of Istria, several major Dalmatian isles and Rijeka, the biggest Croatian port. That's a pretty major chunk of Croatian territory. They desired a lot more, of course, but Mussolini reluctantly agreed to those terms in 1924, after a series of tense negotiations and a good deal foreign pressure.

I'd say the worst thing was the creation of Yugoslavia itself, as a kind of unwanted Pax Illyria (Serbia+ in realirt), but hey, maybe that's me.
No shit. Like all federations with Serbs, Kingdom of Yugoslavia was a true prison for Croatian nation. Oppression and Serbian hegemony were unbearable, and it's no wonder the whole country was on the verge of disorder most of the time.

Comparing Zadar to Dresden is unfounded. Zadar was one of the most heavily foritfied cities in Europe, Dresden did nothing in the war but look pretty.
True, but almost all military targets were located at the harbor. There was no reason for Allies to destroy the entire city. And Zadar wasn't even the only Dalmatian city that suffered excessive British bombardment.

Roland Dumas was stupid. But to be fair, we did get involved in Bosnia, when the French refused to help.
Dumas example indicates general attitude of international community regarding the dissolution of Yugoslavia, which was: "Preserve SFRJ at all costs." They were too arrogant and hypocritical to acknowledge that one cannot "preserve" a country that no longer exists, and the only way Yugoslavia could continue to exist was as Great Serbia, militant and oppressive, a bloody dungeon for all non-Serbs. Though it is true that NATO eventually intervened in Bosnia, it was too late for nearly 300,000 people that were killed since 1991.
 
Scandal escalates to epic proportions - POA has been surveying president Mesic himself!

Stipe Mesic, Croatian president, acquired documents that prove Croatian counter-intelligence agency has been illegally spying on him since April 2004, which is coincidentially the time when agency's current chief, Josko Podbevsek, was appointed with concensus of president Mesic and prime minister Sanader. If these documents are authentic (and there is absolutely no reason to question their authenticity), then this is one of the greatest political scandals in Croatian history. Though it hasn't been stated why the surveillance was ordered and by whom, it doesn't take a genius to figure it out - prime minister Ivo Sanader, after appointing a loyal patsy at the head of POA, used the agency to spy on the Croatian president, in an attempt to acquire evidence that might implicate his involvement in some sort (any sort) of illegal activity. It also doesn't take a genius to figure out why Sanader would need those evidence - the presidential elections are mere weeks away, and the prime minister has been secretly working on discrediting the current president for quite some time, in hope of getting a more "suitable" person in his place.

It is difficult to evaluate all implications of this scandal in a single article - not only is this yet another proof that POA has been operating illegally, spying on Croatian citizens instead of tracking down criminals and terrorists, but the fact that POA has been surveying its own chief (remember, the Croatian president is also the head of Croatia's intelligence community), who is, on top of that, the democratically elected president of the entire country is something that rarely happens even in authoritarian regimes, and is simply unfathomable and utterly unacceptable in a country that pretends to be democratic and strives to join the European Union. Speaking of which, the consequences of this horrifying discovery could prove nothing short of disasterous for Croatia's international reputation, and if we take into consideration that in just one week the European Commission will decide whether or not Croatia will be eligible to join EU in 2007 (a decision of such tremendous importance for the future of Croatia that it will likely be the most important event in its history), it's clear that sending a message to foreign countries in these crucial times, that Croatia is an undemocratic country incapable of controlling its own intelligence agencies, could seal the fate of Croatia for many years to come, condemning this country to a very long period of stagnation.

To make the situation even more catastrophic, the president of the Council for Civil Oversight of Security Services, Vlatko Cvrtila, resigned his position. In a press statement he implied the reason for his resignation was the persisent and arrogant refusal of other council members to acknowledge that POA has been operating illegally (something even sparrows and earthworms know by now) and request official investigation of these activities. With his resignation, the council is left completely paralysed and the Croatian intelligence community is now in total disarray, with no official civil oversight of its activities, the prime minister refusing to co-sign the president's order for Podbevsek's removal and a number of agents gone rogue and leaking top secret documents in an apparent rebellion against the government (which is exactly how the president received the documents that prove POA has been spying on him - a group of rogue agents, who now openly disobey the prime minister and Podbevsek, delivered them to him). This situation is vaguely reminiscent (though far from being comparable in scale and importance) of early 2000, when the police, acting under orders of the new government, raided the headquarters of SZUP and HIS (SZUP is old name of POA - ironic, isn't it? HIS is now known as OA, which stands for "Intelligence Agency" and is our version of CIA. POA is somewhat comparable to American FBI.) and strip-searched every person inside, from officers and their secretaries to cleaning ladies. Apparently, that particular raid didn't produce a significant result, since our secret services still operate more or less in manner of criminal organizations.

Why, oh why do I have to live in this country?!

sanader.jpg

Ivo Sanader, the Croatian prime minister. His charisma and somewhat striking appearance gained him sympathies of many idiotic voters, but they are offset by the fact that he is a lying, dissembling, corrupt snake. He is also rumored to be gay, but that's a story for another occasion...

0406007.17.jpg

President Stipe Mesic. Though he is far from handsome, he is honest, fair, intelligent, determined and uncompromising, and these qualities are the sole reason why is by far the most popular person in the country.
 
As only member of those smelly-scum of the earth-evil-croat-babies-eating nation known as Serbs,i felt obliged to reply.

If we had so much trouble gaining control over Vukovar how come Tudjman only managed to conquer Knin in his dreams?

Also Tudjman goverment managed to fulfill Ante Pavelic's (Ustasha leader,Croatian version of Hitler) plan for Serbs-1/3 to turn into catolics,1/3-to be killed and 1/3 to be chased away from Croatia.

As for Serb's hegemonia-why in fuck did YOUR politicians begged OUR king (King Aleksandar Karadjordjevich) to accept Croatia into the newly formed kingdom?

Later Ustashe killed him in France.Fool,he should have listened to generals Mishich and Putnik-"Sir,don't accept Croats.They hate Serbs more than anything."

Why don't you say few words about Jasenovac?1.700.000 Serbs were killed in the most unhuman and savagly way known to man.Even SS officers were disgusted by Ustasha's methods.

And do remember to post report about Bobetko's symphony known as "Oluja"("Storm").You swiftly managed to chase away 200.000 Serbian civilians and fleeing soldiers from Croatia.

Cuddos for that.

P.S:With the friends like England,we don't need no enemies.Together with Austria they created Albania.

Nuff said.
 
Rusty Skull said:
As only member of those smelly-scum of the earth-evil-croat-babies-eating nation known as Serbs,i felt obliged to reply.

If we had so much trouble gaining control over Vukovar how come Tudjman only managed to conquer Knin in his dreams?
Win some, lose some. Look, Croatian army was so small and poorly armed that we were lucky to hold out as long as we did. We didn't have manpower, weaponry or logistics to perform any mass scale operations until about 1994. All we could do was try to slow Serbian advance. Serbian defeat at Vukovar was unexpected to us as much as it was unexpected to you. But it was at Vukovar that the tide of the Serbian invasion was broken - ask any military analyst and they'll tell you the same.

Also Tudjman goverment managed to fulfill Ante Pavelic's (Ustasha leader,Croatian version of Hitler) plan for Serbs-1/3 to turn into catolics,1/3-to be killed and 1/3 to be chased away from Croatia.
If there's any person I hate more than Milosevic, it's Tudjman. His crimes are too innumerable to be named, and the isolation and stagnation he kept Croatia in for the whole duration of his reign is something I can never forgive, as it condemned me and my entire nation to living in a backward and primitive country that fell behind even such ex-communist slimepits like Romania and Bulgaria.

So don't shove Tudjman's crimes into my face, because I am painfully aware of those exact crimes and many, many more. Also don't expect me to apologize for these crimes, because if it were up to me, Tudjman would have gotten a bullet in his ugly mug back in 1990.

As for Serb's hegemonia-why in fuck did YOUR politicians begged OUR king (King Aleksandar Karadjordjevich) to accept Croatia into the newly formed kingdom?
Beg? Majority of Croatian people were opposed to the federation with the Serbs, however nobody ever asks the people. Politicians who headed the Croatian negotiation team were for the most part unsatisfied with the terms offered by the Serbian king (By the way, Serbian king at that time was Petar, not Aleksandar - Aleksandar was just a regent at that time. Shame on you for not knowing your nation's history. :P ), however Svetozar Pribicevic (a Croatian Serb) and a group gathered around him managed to push Croatia into the Kingdom through deception and usurpation of authority in the People's Council of SHS. A number of influential politicians, like Stjepan Radic (who was executed in 1929 in the middle of the Serbian parliament by king Alexander's assassin - yep, Croats weren't the first ones to begin using terrorism to accomplish their goals), were strongly opposed to Croatian entry into the federation with the Serbs, however they were silenced by the handful of treacherous loudmouths (mostly Croatian Serbs, like Pribicevic) who had a secret agreeement with regent Alexander and didn't care about the fact that their initiative would push Croatia into one of the darkest periods of her history. Like Stjepan Radic put it: "It's still not too late. Don't rush like gooses into fog." However, they rushed.

Later Ustashe killed him in France.Fool,he should have listened to generals Mishich and Putnik-"Sir,don't accept Croats.They hate Serbs more than anything."
You don't understand: Croats didn't hate Serbs, Croats feared them. Every since mid-19th century the main determinants of the Serbian policies were their expansionist tendencies towards Croatia and Bosnia. Every Serbian government in the period between mid-19th century and 2001 wholeheartedly embraced the plans and ideas laid out in the document "Nacertanije" by Ilija Garasanin, where the said dude openly claims that Croats and Bosniaks are in fact alienated Serbs and that every square inch east of the Karlobag-Karlovac-Virovitica line should become part of the future Great Serbia. Croatian fear of Serbs and their pretenses was therefore completely natural, and on multiple occasions it turned out it was also very much justified.

Why don't you say few words about Jasenovac?1.700.000 Serbs were killed in the most unhuman and savagly way known to man.Even SS officers were disgusted by Ustasha's methods.
Jasenovac? Why must you bring up Jasenovac? What do you want me to say? That I agree it was one of the most brutal and horrible mass crimes in the history? That I am ashamed to admit that I'm part of the nation that commited such monstrosities? What would be the point? Jasenovac has no relevance to 1990 and everything that happened afterwards. Most of the participants in that crime were killed in Bleiburg anyway.

Also, 1,700,000??? It was closer to 600,000. However, I won't argue with you about that, since numbers have little relevance when it comes to genocide of such magnitude.

That said, I absolutely despise Ustashe and everyone who supports them. Pavelic and his chronies should die a thousand deaths for all the crimes they commited, not onyl against Serbs, but also against Jews, Gypsies and all Croats who disagreed with them.

And do remember to post report about Bobetko's symphony known as "Oluja"("Storm").You swiftly managed to chase away 200.000 Serbian civilians and fleeing soldiers from Croatia.
Nothing can justify crimes that were committed in "Oluja". They were work of ruthless and demented people, of Tudjman and his loyal ministers and generals, who brought great shame upon this nation in their devious attempt to create an ethnically clean Croatia. However, I would also like to remind you that Serbs in Krain were an occupying rebel army that was responsible for many crimes against the Croatian people, including genocide and forced exodus (when you talk about the countless Serbs that were - unrightfully - driven out of their homes in 1994, you conveniently fail to mention that after 1991 there wasn't a single Croat remaining on the territory of Serbian Krain).

P.S:With the friends like England,we don't need no enemies.Together with Austria they created Albania.

Nuff said.
Albanian people have right to be independent and sovereign like any other nation. Though history taught me that Serbs have trouble grasping that concept.

EDIT: The Jasenovac matter has been on my mind ever since last night, so I checked several reliable sources and found out that about 50,000 people were killed in Jasenovac. The 600,000 estimate was made in 1945 by a commission assembled by communists and is overinflated because Tito was hoping to get higher reparations if he displays Nazi crimes as bigger than they really were. I have no idea where you pulled those 1,700,000 from - I bet even Milosevic would disagree with you on that.
 
My God Ratty...your country is descending into chaos!

However it gladdens my heart to no end to see the Croatian people acting with such resolve. Those agents that turned in the documents pertaining to the surveillance of the President are true patriots...realizing the people make he government work...not the other way around.

Thats the way its SUPPOSED to be here.

Sincerely,
The Vault Dweller
 
The POA affair near conclusion - justice prevails!

Last evening Stipe Mesic, president of Croatia, and Ivo Sanader, prime minister, met in secrecy to try and work out a solution for the scandal that has been trembling Croatia for almost a month. After a lengthy debate that was closed to public, prime minister Sanader, who had been defying the president's authority and insisting on defending Josko Podbevsek even after it was proven beyond all doubt that Podbevsek operated illegally and even spied on the president himself, finally relented and agreed to relieve the POA chief of duty. Not only that, but the two politicians even agreed on the name of Podbevsek's successor - it will be Tomislav Karamarko, an intelligence expert and president's personal friend! This is a full and absolute victory for president Mesic, and a great leap forward for Croatian democracy. Though it will all be for naught if Karamarko fails to resolve the dreadful situation in POA and finally rout the undemocratic and criminal elements within the service, at least the unbearable and paralysing conflict between Mesic and Sanader was resolved in a manner that gives hope for Croatian democratic development.

In other news, a human rights organization awarded Helena Puljiz (the journalist who started the whole affair when she reported harrassment by POA agents) for the great service she did to human rights in Croatia by fearlessly reporting the incident to public institutions and unrelentingly pursuing justice even at the cost of her own career and safety.

And what can I say in conclusion? Congratulations, Mr. President, you have proven that democracy in Croatia is still strong and that justice prevails even when government applies all of its repressive mechanisms to prevent it. No matter what happens in the future, I will always respect you immensely for the uncompromising manner in which you defended civil rights of Croatian people during November and December 2004, those dark months when the government tried to destroy the Croatian democracy. As for you, Helena, thank you for your courage, your devotion to democratic principles and your great contribution to protecting those principles. You have shown us that courage and almost audacious idealism are stronger than all political power in the world. You will forever be remembered as one of the greatest pioneers of Croatian democracy.
 
Not that I really know much about this, but unless Sanader somehow managed to get caught with his pants down, I wonder what Mesić has given up in exchange. Also, the "president's personal friend" bit sounds potentially scary.

Sorry for raining on your parade, Ratty, but the news just sounds too 'absolute' for my liking. And you never know; even people with high perceived moral credit can be involved in shady dealings. Hell, Václav Havel secured his re-election by having an opposition MP arrested in 1998. :P
 
DJ Slamák said:
Not that I really know much about this, but unless Sanader somehow managed to get caught with his pants down, I wonder what Mesić has given up in exchange. Also, the "president's personal friend" bit sounds potentially scary.
I doubt he had to give anything up. Sanader was at fault for usurping authority, so he was legally bound to give in eventually, moreso because the public opinion was overwhelmingly against him. Though Croatian politics usually operates on concensus, compromises and fair trade, this was a full-scale political conflict, which ended in total victory of the president.

Sorry for raining on your parade, Ratty, but the news just sounds too 'absolute' for my liking. And you never know; even people with high perceived moral credit can be involved in shady dealings. Hell, Václav Havel secured his re-election by having an opposition MP arrested in 1998. :P
Mesic has been in politics for 40 years now. He has been the president of evey country he ever lived in (both SFRJ and Croatia). He has more experience under his belt than all other Croatian politicians together. But in these 40 years, he never did a thing that violated law or democratic principles. I have full trust and confidence in him, and that's saying a lot, because I generally consider all politicians a bunch of lying swines.

Chill it, Slamak. You're more worried than I am, and you don't even live here. :P
 
Back
Top