Nah, try Baldurs Gate, because the combat system are more similar to that.
Astiaks said:generalissimofurioso said:Apparently, it's like Night and Day according to people.
It's funny how even the mostly console-oriented reviewers are admitting this.
eh?
guess it's like playing fallout 1 with a controller.
Astiaks said:generalissimofurioso said:...and feel bad for anyone who bought it for a console.
Because of the controls?
my only option is the ps3 version right now.
Shocking exclusive: older hardware produces lower quality visuals!Astiaks said:
And they say people buy games prevalently when being attracted by their magnificent graphical presentation.Astiaks said:
aenemic said:I'm not sure wether to be happy or sad about Dragon Age looking like crap.
I mean, it's impressive that they have the guts to release a game that seems to concentrate more on actual gameplay than graphics these days... but the graphics are way below what you expect from a company like Bioware.
aenemic said:what I'm whining about is mainly how character models look and the quality of some textures - they look dated, and the design is just bad. characters are ugly, simple as that.
and yes, I know Bioware aren't known for their beautiful games, but what I've seen is still far below what I expect from a Bioware game in 2009. Mass Effect was lightyears (no pun intended) ahead of this, at least in character models.
aenemic said:I'll probably have to wait until I actually play the game to pass final judgement. I'm just saying what I think of the stuff I've seen so far. it's nice to hear that animations are good though, because to me good animations are a lot more important than pretty graphics.
either way, if the game is good I won't care how it looks.