This isn't really a gold value thread, guys. Just...y'know....just saying, the topic was supposed to be the Eurozone crisis.
Looking at their total share in taxes is pretty inaccurate. You're not actually measuring how much of their income they're paying in taxes, just how much of the nationwide wealth/income is theirs. Inequality has been growing for decades in the USA. The result should naturally be that the rich pay more taxes in an absolute sense, but that doesn't mean they are being taxed more in a relative sense.Edmond Dantès said:Edit 2: The rich are, actually, taxed more than ever nowadays. According to an economy 101 lecture by Prof. Timothy Taylor, in 1980 the top quintile of income paid 56.3% of all taxes in the US. In 1990 this was up to 57.9%, by 1995 the top quintile was paying 61.9% of all federal taxes. By 2000 the top quintile was paying 66.7% of all taxes. That dropped of a bit in 2002 after the tax cuts in 2001, when it was 64.8%.
If you look at the top 5% of income, they were paying 37.3% of all federal taxes as of 2002. I'm with Taylor here when he states that, he's not against the rich paying more, but compared to the 1980's and the Reagan years, they are paying a larger share of taxes. And it wouldn't be right to say that they're paying a historically low share of taxes.
In fact, trouble started in 2007 when an American real estate market have collapsed. Thousands people of America were dreaming their American dream about an own house, taking highly risky hypothecary debts. A lot of this people were unable to pay their debts due to various reason pretty soon. When the American market collapsed, European Central Bank was hit by weakened world economy in 2008.Kari said:I'm worried about recent opinions of people i've read from several newspapers website comments. People seems to think, that rich people are cause of this crisis as they hog all money to themself.
AskWazzup said:Could you really call it a Euro crisis, when the whole economy is pretty global now. Sure the EU countries have a bunch of problems, but so do every other country in the world, because they run on similar economic models. If there will be a real EU crisis, the world will follow.
In any case, i think we will see cycles upon cycles of worldwide economic crisis, with the way we are living right now - burning up too many resources very inefficiently, so to provide a living standart that we cannot upkeep in the long run with the way things work now.
Sander said:Inequality has been growing for decades in the USA. The result should naturally be that the rich pay more taxes in an absolute sense, but that doesn't mean they are being taxed more in a relative sense.
It's much more productive to look at the economy and income equality as a whole, in which case the picture is a lot less rosy.
DammitBoy said:How has taking more and more of the peoples money in taxation worked out for europe so far? lol
Gold has no intrinsic value. Like money, the only value it has is the value people give it.
The 1920s would like to have their retarded, discredited economic ideas back.
Also, Robert Wenzel isn't actually a credible authority on economics, he's just a dude with a website and some crackpot theories based on the idea that markets are inherently efficient (no, they are not).
Alphadrop said:Considering Italy still isn't used to being a country and parts of it threaten civil war every other week I'm sure it wouldn't take much.
.Pixote. said:Also tax the rich. A lot.
Jebus said:I can't speak for the rest of the EU - I'm not really all that familiar with their tax systems - but at least in Belgium, it's reached a breaking point.
The Financial Times (IIRC) put Belgium just below Barbados in the countries where it's best living when you're rich, hell when you're working class. I'm currently still being paid a wage, which in my tax bracked (and I'm not in a particularly high one by far) 56% of my total wage costs go to the government, another 2% to municipal level. Which leaves 42% of my wage for me. 42%! 42! Can you imagine such a thing? When one takes stuff like VAT and 'indirect' taxes (car, taxes paid immediately on stuff like gasoline, cigarettes, insurance, etc.), my 'net' spending power drops to something like 30% of my gross income. It's ridiculous. And then they wonder why almost no-one under 35 can't buy a house without *substantial* help from their elder family members.
What this leads to is a society that doesn't spend its money. My g/f and I, and most people of my age I know, desperately try to spend as little as possible in order to save to buy a house someday.
How has taking more and more of the peoples money in taxation worked out for europe so far? lol
DammitBoy said:How has taking more and more of the peoples money in taxation worked out for europe so far? lol
Jebus said:DammitBoy said:How has taking more and more of the peoples money in taxation worked out for europe so far? lol
A major problem, at least in Belgium, is that taxation is very badly distributed. The middle in Belgium is very, very squeezed.
It's rather like in the USA, really. While this has always been the case in Belgium, the EU's Anglosaxon economic policies has made the situation much, much worse.
Ilosar said:How has taking more and more of the peoples money in taxation worked out for europe so far? lol
How has having the biggest debt in the world and having millions of people eat on government food stamps worked for the US so far?
Joelzania said:Hey, at least I can break my leg and get it repaired for free!
Actually, no. The economic crisis was in no way caused by 'emulating Europe' or by anything do with social security. The economic crisis was caused by a complex system of financial incentives in the financial and mortgage markets - caused by deregulation and the creation of complicated derivatives and insurances on those derivatives.DammitBoy said:Emulating europe has pretty much screwed us, except for the fact that we have the worlds dominate naval force, so the rest of the world is forced to use our currency as the global standard.
And again, not the issue in Europe at all. Lots of issues in the Euro zone. That? Not one of them.DammitBoy said:Thanks for providing the exact reason why the EU is screwed. There is no such thing as free. Someone had to contribute their income to provide the non-contributor with "free" medical care. The EU's problem is there are a lot more willing to take while providing nothing of value in return.