Fallout Nuka World DLC trailer and information are online

6jI8uye.jpg

They're clearly raiding Sanctuary Hills in this screenshot, so you now have the ability to build settlements from the ground up and then raid them. What?
Why should guns look like this again? Doesn't look like it's gonna be functional or I'm missing something.
 
Maybe they got the idea of KEWL GUN SKINZ from that new Counter-Strike
 
The real question is if we will be finally able to kill Preston and his ''followers''? Wait.. I don't care anymore...
 
Has anyone noticed that you can have a gay relationship with Preston, with all the knobs and whistles, and he calls you babe?
 
I wonder... Fallout 3 was their poor attempt at copying the originals. Maybe the reason for why we are seeing this kind of garbage in fo4 is because Bethesda genuinely have no Fucking clue what fallout is about. And i dont mean that they sit at their studio "thinking" they know what it is about, i mean that their frantically running around panicking because everyone is so creatively bancrupt that they know thenselves that they have no idea what fallout is about and so now in the dlcs theyre desperately throwing out any idea they have in the hopes that some of them will be a hit.

Cause i just can't see how anyone over at bgs could take a good long look at this drivel and feel proud of themselves.
 
Okay, I actually like some of the new creatures like that crocodile (I think it is one), the weird worm thing, the mutant crickets, and that swarm of little bugs.
But for the rest, I know Fallout always played some things for laughs, but this just feels so out of place sometimes and it is really not that a post apocalyptic theme park could not work.

Also Nuka Cola is also an analog of Disney? Sorry but that is just stupid. Just come up with some a better mascot character and theme.

Oh and the paddle ball weapon is Fallout 3 level of stupidity. Who the hell thought that such a weapon would make sense?!

Agree with everything you said.. I didn't mind F4 so much when it was first released but every dlc but 1 "?" makes me shake my head and wish for something that dosn't suck ass. Hell they are making Heartfire from Skyrim look like a grade A DLC right now..

Oh but the big twist is yet to come. See, the aliens are using illusions to make people think that they are little green men when they're actually reptilians and have walked among us since the dawn of time. :V

Hillary for first lizard lady! Ops i meant president :P

Maybe they got the idea of KEWL GUN SKINZ from that new Counter-Strike

I hope it is just 1 random gun or so. I've seen real guns with that kind of shit so it would not be impossible to find a few in the world but if they let you pain all the guns.. I don't know.
 
Last edited:
I wonder... Fallout 3 was their poor attempt at copying the originals. Maybe the reason for why we are seeing this kind of garbage in fo4 is because Bethesda genuinely have no Fucking clue what fallout is about. And i dont mean that they sit at their studio "thinking" they know what it is about, i mean that their frantically running around panicking because everyone is so creatively bancrupt that they know thenselves that they have no idea what fallout is about and so now in the dlcs theyre desperately throwing out any idea they have in the hopes that some of them will be a hit.

Cause i just can't see how anyone over at bgs could take a good long look at this drivel and feel proud of themselves.
You do realize that they're serious, experienced developers and not bunch of toddlers? They just do what the fanbase wants and they get monies, they really don't give a damn about what Fallout was about.
 
Well... They definitely get monies but I look at fallout 4 and it doesn't seem to be made for fans of any previous fallout game...
It is, if you count Fallout 3

So, you think Bethesda is just a couple of kids goofing around and not one of the biggest RPG developers of many years? They're businessmen, they know what they're doing. Whether they are butchering Fallout or not is not relevant to them.
 
It is, if you count Fallout 3.
No. Its not. Fallout 3 actually had dialogue and choices. It had actual conversations. It had skills. It used SPECIAL. It actually functioned on it's own as an RPG. Was it good? No. But that's just symptomatic of Bethesda. New vegas tried to please both classic fans and fo3 fans. Fo4 said "fuck that noise" and tried to please to neither and instead opted to make a piece of shit that "everyone" will love.
 
Fallout 3 actually had dialogue and choices. It had actual conversations. It had skills. It used SPECIAL. It actually functioned on it's own as an RPG
Apparently, their target audience don't favor that role-playing mascarade that much. They want more sandbox shooting'n'looting, so that's what Beth is focusing on.

Cant they be both?
No. Their games are childish because their fans want their games childish.
 
Apparently, their target audience don't favor that role-playing mascarade that much. They want more sandbox shooting'n'looting, so that's what Beth is focusing on.


No. Their games are childish because their fans want their games childish.
But the problem is that neither ''shooting'' or ''looting'' in this game is not that good either... If I want good shooter I will play BF3/BF4 or ARMA series, if I want to loot (lol really?) I will play Diablo 3 or similar titles.. So their fan base is just Bethdrones I guess lol
 
So they finally aren't trying to hide the fact they just make interactive theme parks... looks like complete horseshit.
Well that really depends on what your standards are for what constitutes "interactive". Fo1 was far more interactive (and reactive I might add) then fo4 ever was.
 
But the problem is that neither ''shooting'' or ''looting'' in this game is not that good either... If I want good shooter I will play BF3/BF4 or ARMA series, if I want to loot (lol really?) I will play Diablo 3 or similar titles.. So their fan base is just Bethdrones I guess lol
I know, right? I don't get it what do people see in Fallout 3, either.
 
Back
Top