Finally read Catch-22.
Had some difficulty at first grasping the style of the book. After I got the hang of the (seeming) internal contradictions I really started to enjoy the book. The last few chapters stand in stark contrast to the rest of the book, but are nonetheless very good, just in a different way.
Then I gave Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series a shot. I'm halfway through 'The Eye of the World' but I think I'm going to quit the book, and the series. I already find his style of writing to be long-winded, and supposedly that only gets worse and worse in later books. There are so many other, good, better, books and series out there that I can't afford to waste my time with something barely mediocre. Apart from that, I dislike some characters, specifically Mat Cauthon, and on more than one occasion Rand as well. Also, Jordan seems to know of only one type of female character. Perrin, so far, seems to be the only character that doesn't have his head up his arse.
Added to that come two complaints. One, Jordan is too easy and predictable, and - a complaint which ties in with the first - unless he ought to be credited with inventing the clichés of the fantasy novel genre, he makes such abundant use of every single cliché and topos that it barely feels as if he himself adds anything creative. Some farm boys, who perhaps are all 'chosen ones', travel with a band of adventures throughout the land, get chased by what seems like a crossbreed between Trolls, Orcs and goats, led by Nazgûls. One character has an unknown and mysterious past you just know is going to come back with, supposedly, some shocking revelation that'll no doubt under-awe to the extreme. One example of predictability is the character of Mat. You know he'll screw up, and once you find out that, yes indeed he did, in precisely the way you thought he would, it just gets frustrating.
Perhaps Jordan is the worst possible author to follow up Catch-22. Whereas Joseph Heller is a master at staying ahead of his readers, catching them by surprise at every turn, Jordan seems like set on rails, going through the motions, merely showing the reader the predictable advances of his characters, always one step behind the reader. An author's advantage is knowing more than his audience. Jordan gives away that advantage character-wise; I can't as of yet say how he performs plot-wise, but I don't mind not finding out.