Gamespot 9 http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/fallout-4-review/1900-6416306/ Destructoid 7.5 http://www.destructoid.com/review-fallout-4-318096.phtml IGN 9.5 http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/11/09/fallout-4-review Polygon 9.5 http://www.polygon.com/2015/11/9/9648824/fallout-4-review-xbox-one-PS4-PC PC Gamer 88 http://www.pcgamer.com/fallout-4-review/ Shacknews 8 http://www.shacknews.com/article/92077/fallout-4-review-war-only-slightly-changes The Escapist 4.5/5 http://www.escapistmagazine.com/art...4-Review-Bethesda-s-Open-World-RPG-Apocalypse
This is not surprising. Also, is it just me but does it sound like that the ones who are giving this game 9 and 10's are making excuses for it? Also, good for Destructoid for not being a marketing and hype whore for Bethesda. This IS going to be like Skyrim all over again. Funny how history repeats itself.
Definitely the Polygon review, how can it refer to so many faults and still give it a 9.5? Bethesda, Bethesda Never Changes
Oh how I remember when Mass Effect 3 was getting near perfect scores and was deemed a "masterpiece" by nearly every "professional" critic only for the user score to tear apart the game. I have a feeling that this is going to happen with Fallout 4.
Yeah, wasn't too surprised by this. A lot of high review scores followed by lots of writing about how things aren't amazing. It's the whole "sum is more than the value of its parts" argument. This is why I hate the concept of review scores. Scores are meaningless aside from an easy way to bypass actual thinking and give fanboys a supposedly objective method for smacking each other with their e-dongs.
PCWorld was a bit critical with its review calling it "Oblivion with guns" but still giving it a 3.5/5 stars: http://www.pcworld.com/article/3002...t-might-start-a-tiny-flame-in-your-heart.html
Yup... Skyrim with guns. Who woulda thunk it? The more things change, the more they stay the same. Could this be the pivotal moment where they finally realize the emperor has no clothes? We'll see...
Ahah. Hahahaha. HAHAHAHAHAHA. Check this shit out. From Jim Sterling's review "What I love most about the companionship of Fallout 4 is the fact that, yes, you can pursue multiple romantic partnerships and the game totally allows it. You’re not locked into a single relationship, and can actually maintain more than one without getting judged or upsetting anybody. This is certainly the first game I’ve seen – and arguably the first mainstream one overall – that simply allows for polyamorous relationships without making a big deal about it." Is anyone surprised? Anyone at all?
Ah I think that's just reveling in the absurdity of such a game mechanic is all. Though I'll be steering clear of such a silly thing, for obviously this is not a game that treats romantic relations with the seriousness that they deserve.
3 has two perks you can buy with lifetime happiness points: No jealously - this Sim's partners won't get jealous and stone hearted this Sim won't get jealous any more. You can make a huge polyamorous chain with multiple layers if that's your thing in The Sims 3. I mean big tangent but it's kinda amazing GTA gets so much flak with the kind of thing you can do in The Sims and it marketed to kids.
A French gaming site called GameKult which has a reputation of being "tough but fair" and is the bane of many fanboys gave Fallout 4 a 6/10 stating while it is fun it is basically Skyrim with guns and has awful writing and poor quest design. God Bless the French. http://www.gamekult.com/jeux/test-fallout-4-SU3050477633t.html#ps4