Hamas leader pwned

Revolver said:
All I can see is that scene from Hot Shots!


BEFORE


YAS1.jpg



AFTER

1copy.jpg


I don't see how killing a crippled old man, his two sons, 5 civilians and wounding 18 civilians including 4 children is going to help the peace process.
 
I don't see how killing a crippled old man, his two sons, 5 civilians and wounding 18 civilians including 4 children is going to help the peace process.
The timing really did make it shitty move in terms of peace process - but you're not going to arouse any sympathy from me by showing me a photograph of him making a goofy face. Maybe you should post the aftermaths of the bombings that his group planned and executed to deliberately target civilians and sabotage peace talks. And I don't think the death of armed guards in a terrorist organization is killing 'civilians'.
 
I'm not saying that what hamas or any other terrorist organization does is right. Killing civilians is wrong and its not going to bring any good for anyone. The new Sharon's police of "an eye for an eye" is going to bring total chaos because its going to put a government into the same level of a terrorist organization. Now hamas has a new leader and a martyr and they are going to kill more civilians. That's why I think an international intervention is necessary. ONU should do something there.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3562029.stm

BBC NEWS said:
Retaliation

There is certainly a sense of disbelief amongst some people at what Israel has done, that Israel was prepared to go so far as to kill the spiritual leader of Hamas.

Many people here are calling this a red line over which Israel has stepped.


Mourners console Sheikh Yassin's wife (centre) in Gaza on Tuesday

This has created a deep sense of anger which is not showing itself on the streets - but it is certainly there.

This is the reason why most people here expect Hamas to do what they have threatened - take revenge for the killing of their spiritual leader.

Some people on the streets of Gaza have expressed fear for what may happen now, that perhaps we are about to see a new bloodier phase of the conflict.

Certainly, no one wants to predict violence.

However, the events of the last few years have shown that when Israel does assassinate members of Hamas or other leaders in Gaza or the West Bank, then the militant groups will try to stage some sort of retaliation.

Gandhi said something that can be the result of this proccess during the civil war in India.

Gandhi said:
An eye for an eye is going to leave the world blind.
 
Jebus said:
Oh, but he wasn't bombed in his car.

He was bombed while rolling his wheelchair.
Leaving church.
By a helicopter.
With THREE missiles.
Doesn't anyone else see what is wrong with this? How the hell anyone can still symphatise with the Zionist cause of those goddamn Israelies is beyond me.


yeah, and I heard his neighbors as saying he was really quiet and didn't bother anybody.
those bastards --- can't they shoot their missiles at somebody who can at least flee in terror?

dude, when battlefield: israel comes to the pc next year, I'm going to camp in my helicopter and yell w00t! every time the enemy rolls his wheelchair into my sights.
like you won't.



Baboon said:
I'm just using the word pwn {Beats me likes a baby seal "cuz" I am STOOPID!} they overkilled him. It's like using an H-bomb to kill a mosquito. I mean, HELICOPTER BOMBARDMENT against a single man? He was probably important, but he wasn't an X-man. I'm not saying it's cool, I don't agree with the Israelis, especially not the comment they made about it.


well, he WAS a bald old guy in a wheelchair --- I think it's possible that this is just a case of mistaken identity.
look for marvel to latch onto this and pit the x-men against the jewish defense league in a supersized annual.



Briosafreak said:
Hey Rosh now imagine the complete weirdness of sending a 1 ton bomb from a F-16 to someones head to blow him up. The israelis actually killed Salam Shehad, also from Hamas (in this case from the Ezzedin Al-Qassam brigades) that way. Literaly felt on top of him, blowing him to smithereens. The only thing one could say afterwards is "fragged!!111!!" :shock:


hehehehe.....I certainly cannot ever imagine the us doing anything like that..........

I predict that in the next couple years we may see israel make use of really giant anvils.
 
well, you can say what you like about the israelis, but I know I wouldn't fuck w/them.

edit: welsh --

you mean you expect to see more hamas leaders blown up?
me, too.
 
hamas or just about anyone else the Israeli's don't like.

and everyone next to them (within a city block or more).
 
welsh said:
hamas or just about anyone else the Israeli's don't like.

and everyone next to them (within a city block or more).


well, if you've got a problem w/that, you'd better hope bush never gets pissed at you.
 
and so the slippery slope. By using terrorist tactics to fight terrorists, one slides towards state terrorism. Democracies are not immune. The Spanish against the ETA, the Brits against the IRA, Peru against the Shining Path and others.

It's happened a few times in the past. They are talking about making a new intelligence agency for domestic spying. In the 1960s and 70s the FBI spied on the civil rights movement and student protestors.

Beware the devil you seek out least it comes to stare at you in the mirror.
 
Oops! They did it again! With yet another helicopter strike this time too!

This looks like a freaking sequel or something: "Hamas leader pwned 2: with a vengeance". I mean c'mon, why do they have to use gunships every single time? What happened to subtlety? Why aren't they using Sam Fisher? What the fuck is Mossad doing, really? Insurance companies will have to introduce a special "death by helicopter overkill strike" insurance if this goes on. Quite silly, and it seems to point out the Israelis' total worthlessness and incompetence, perhaps even their fear, in handling the slightest thing.

Ariel Sharon (can you imagine that, he has two female names) is a fat-butted moron and Bush is an idiot (surprise everyone?) to have encouraged him.

Something very very bad is going to happen soon, and it will encompass the whole world. The volcano is about to erupt, if you see what I mean. I'm going to build my shelter.
 
At least they got the job done! Blew up some civilians, but hey, does anyone here know how to make an omelette without breaking a few eggs? The Americans are still looking for a ghost Osama while the Israelis are taking care of the problem in a brutal, but efficient way. And if they are resorting to such methods then they must be either desperate enough or determined enough to put an end to all the suicide bombings.
 
I'd kick your balls for that in RL, you know. Really, I would.

Yeah, kill the bastards. Who cares if some innocent civilians die, anyways? Prolly some tree-huggin' liberal pinko punk.

Hmm. Maybe that's exactly the same train of thought the terrorist organizations follow?

Hmm...Hmm...
 
welsh said:
Like people, one should judge a country not by what it says, but by what it does.

Definitely not a good way to look at things. I don't judge a country at all by "what it does." I judge a country by their culture, and what wonderful things the country has. What a country does has nothing to do with the identity of the country. Rather, it has everything to do with the agendas of those in power in that country. I don't look at like England, and say I hate England cause of what it does. I look at Tony Blair and say, wow, stop sucking GW's dick.
 
welsh said:
...Brits against the IRA...
Luckily for us, the IRA (and it's various offshoots) are pretty quiet at the mo'. The Good Friday Agreement and the war on terror seem to have made them retreat into the woodwork a bit.
They were never on the scale of Hamas though.

@KoC, I agree, it's bad enough that Dubya's in power (and making the US look bad), but for Blair to follow him around like a lap dog make us look bad too.
 
King of Creation said:
welsh said:
Like people, one should judge a country not by what it says, but by what it does.

Definitely not a good way to look at things. I don't judge a country at all by "what it does." I judge a country by their culture, and what wonderful things the country has. What a country does has nothing to do with the identity of the country. Rather, it has everything to do with the agendas of those in power in that country. I don't look at like England, and say I hate England cause of what it does. I look at Tony Blair and say, wow, stop sucking GW's dick.

So according to you, if a country with a great, ancient culture suddenly decides to eliminate a densely populated area with a nuclear strike, they have the right to do so? One should definitely judge a country by what it does. In our part of the world, leaders are chosen and dismissed by the people, if I remember correctly. So holding a whole country responsible is often quite right. Sticking to retarded principles is what got most people there in the first place.
 
So what you're telling me is that I have the choice of whether or not to attack a country with nuclear missiles. Absolutely not. I have absolutely no choice regarding what my country does militarily. Do you think We had a choice whether or not Bush went into Iraq? No. Do you think we had a choice in Vietnam? No. Do you think the American people protested these wars and others on a large scale? Yes. Do you think it did anything regarding the decisions of the administration? No. If you think the people of a country are responsible for, or have a choice regarding what their administration does militarily, then you are ignorant.
 
No, then you just need to change your country's constitution. In many European countries doing what Bush did would mean political suicide. And what is shocking too is that many Americans support him. If you can't control what your own leaders are doing then there's something horribly wrong. I don't think this is what Welsh meant by the way.

Back to topic, not all, but many Israelis are responsible for Sharon doing what he is doing.
 
Baboon said:
Back to topic, not all, but many Israelis are responsible for Sharon doing what he is doing.
...and many aren't.
It's okay to look at what a country does when deciding whether or not you "like" them, but you have to weight that opinion with how much support there is for a country's actions.
 
Back
Top