I hate heights, but I feel like the way down to my death would be fun. Dunno why
How Do You Feel About Gender Identity Hw ?
- Thread starter Fizzycswag
- Start date
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
or we could take a page from the book of mike pence our current vice president.
"if ya like the chaps you'll get the zaps"
and
"AC/DC for the LGBT"
Goddamn son you’re just firing these out
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
oh no these are stolen as fuck.
credit goes to a fella by the name of markus meechan
Ok that makes sense. Thought you were Gilbert Gottfried-ing jokes at me
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
honestly tho count dankula is underrated.
rather famously he was arrested for making a nazi joke thus indusputably once and for all revealing the UK as a dystopian hellhole.
seriously this is what he was arrested for:
the trial lasted literally longer than the nuremberg trials.
he was ultimatley tried and convicted for being "grossly offensive" and fined 800 pounds.
now that you're all caught up join me in outrage.
rather famously he was arrested for making a nazi joke thus indusputably once and for all revealing the UK as a dystopian hellhole.
seriously this is what he was arrested for:
the trial lasted literally longer than the nuremberg trials.
he was ultimatley tried and convicted for being "grossly offensive" and fined 800 pounds.
now that you're all caught up join me in outrage.
That poor dog being basically trained to be racist...
And that’s how human nazis are created.
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
lol what the actual fuck
dogs have no concept of race. in all likelihood jews just mean "treats" to him.
at any rate the man shouldn't have been arrested for a joke and certainly shouldn't have been fined for it. he makes it stupidly clear that its not a race thing in the first place.
I was kidding; hence the second part of that post.
An ignorant creature being taught to fall in line with beliefs is how actual nazis are made. It’s a joke AND a commentary.
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
AYYYYY
anyways despite the comments he makes in the video such as "least cute thing i could think of: a nazi" and "im not racist btw i just wanted to get on my girlfriend's tits"
the courts straight up told him that "context doesn't matter"
That’s fucking idiotic. I hate the legal system of most countries.
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
the most harrowing thing is that this basically means that people in the UK have no right to free speech.
That’s... really frightening and sets a bad precedent. I see your point
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
he's on record of saying he's not gonna pay it. they'll hafta throw him in jail for a joke.
That’s really fucked
R.Graves
Confirmed Retard
if you're gonna watch only one clip of the video there's a great clip of him responding to a reporter trying to brand him a criminal at 4:19
So you think people should be treated differently under the law on account of party membership and what kind of people they might possibly know?
I mean... Are you actually, factually, and honest-to-all-the-Gods retarded?
I mean... Are you actually, factually, and honest-to-all-the-Gods retarded?
D
Deleted member 116891
Guest
Thanks for asking, I'm not saying that at all. Sorry if I implied that there. I don't consider myself retarded, so I'll try again.
R.Graves was talking about context, and I was saying that the court used the context I described as evidence to reject his appeal, to override the context the man claimed was grounds for them not to prosecute.
However, if you want to take context out of it completely, then that's fine for me as well. The man breached the communications act with the interim guidelines attached, and was thus prosecuted. If a man did that under any other party, then that would and should happen too.
To put context back in:The court, in rejecting his appeal, looked at the same context I did and who was generating the public interest i.e 'a large number of persons who appear to share the appellant’s racist views.' The court also references the attempt by the defendants legal team to reference the publicly funded campaign by Tommy Robinson and co to 'intimidate the court when he was sentenced, by referencing "a publicly-funded appeal” and making “unprofessional and improper” declarations of support.' Maybe it's a little more than 'might possibly know' and the court seems to have deduced this also.
Thus, as I said above, the man broke the Law and was prosecuted, that's it.
I was simply stating why I'm not getting outraged over the apparent lack of free speech-the man's appeal was based upon legal bases that were quickly thrown out, as well as a public outrage fuelled by known racists to intimidate the court into overturning a very simple case. That may make him and the people he 'might possibly' know into nasty people,no? And therefore I'm not upset he is going to jail.
I do hope that clears me from retardation, Hassknecht. If not please do explain to me why you still thinkme one.
R.Graves was talking about context, and I was saying that the court used the context I described as evidence to reject his appeal, to override the context the man claimed was grounds for them not to prosecute.
However, if you want to take context out of it completely, then that's fine for me as well. The man breached the communications act with the interim guidelines attached, and was thus prosecuted. If a man did that under any other party, then that would and should happen too.
To put context back in:The court, in rejecting his appeal, looked at the same context I did and who was generating the public interest i.e 'a large number of persons who appear to share the appellant’s racist views.' The court also references the attempt by the defendants legal team to reference the publicly funded campaign by Tommy Robinson and co to 'intimidate the court when he was sentenced, by referencing "a publicly-funded appeal” and making “unprofessional and improper” declarations of support.' Maybe it's a little more than 'might possibly know' and the court seems to have deduced this also.
Thus, as I said above, the man broke the Law and was prosecuted, that's it.
I was simply stating why I'm not getting outraged over the apparent lack of free speech-the man's appeal was based upon legal bases that were quickly thrown out, as well as a public outrage fuelled by known racists to intimidate the court into overturning a very simple case. That may make him and the people he 'might possibly' know into nasty people,no? And therefore I'm not upset he is going to jail.
I do hope that clears me from retardation, Hassknecht. If not please do explain to me why you still thinkme one.
D
Deleted member 93956
Guest
The poor guy, having to pay 800$ (which is a month's worth alone of hias relatively unpopular Patreon) for a fine (oh noes) and then just coincidentally making 250 times from an audience that "totaly" isn't largely composed of those reactionaries he's well aware of having and appealing to (really just read the comments). I'll make a space for him in my prayers.
And it's not "people who may know". He's campaigned for UKIP in several videos, had members vouch for him and participated in events holding hands with them. It's not that association alone that is troublesome but the fact that "just a joke bro" compunded by support and following of a party and political spectrum that would have their represenatives say, quote,
"You Left-wing scum are all the same, wanting to hand our birthright to Romanian gypsies who beat their wives and children into begging and stealing money they can gamble with, Muslim nutters who want to kill us and put us all under medieval Sharia law, the same Africans who sold their Afro-Caribbean brothers into a slavery that Britain was the first to abolish."
Cough. Among other things. And how curious, they also had issues with legality (and their own party ironically) and tried to smokescreen themselves with excuses and "coincidences" like oh-no-really-my-account-was-hacked-even-if-I'd-totally-say-that-and-do. The far right has used victimism almost brilliantly to smokescreen their own public inadequacies and twist it around to make a situation where they're exploiting their free speech, and in most cases, influence to broadcast their nonsense feeding into existingly toxic situations, turn around and be about *others* doing so, allegedly.
Funnily enough, "muh context" only would hurt him more, considering support for Bolsonaro and authoritarians while decrying being opressed by such (figures), glee for political violence on leftists, the voiced intention to unlawfully report immigrants to risk of deportation- you get the idea.
And it's not "people who may know". He's campaigned for UKIP in several videos, had members vouch for him and participated in events holding hands with them. It's not that association alone that is troublesome but the fact that "just a joke bro" compunded by support and following of a party and political spectrum that would have their represenatives say, quote,
"You Left-wing scum are all the same, wanting to hand our birthright to Romanian gypsies who beat their wives and children into begging and stealing money they can gamble with, Muslim nutters who want to kill us and put us all under medieval Sharia law, the same Africans who sold their Afro-Caribbean brothers into a slavery that Britain was the first to abolish."
Cough. Among other things. And how curious, they also had issues with legality (and their own party ironically) and tried to smokescreen themselves with excuses and "coincidences" like oh-no-really-my-account-was-hacked-even-if-I'd-totally-say-that-and-do. The far right has used victimism almost brilliantly to smokescreen their own public inadequacies and twist it around to make a situation where they're exploiting their free speech, and in most cases, influence to broadcast their nonsense feeding into existingly toxic situations, turn around and be about *others* doing so, allegedly.
Funnily enough, "muh context" only would hurt him more, considering support for Bolsonaro and authoritarians while decrying being opressed by such (figures), glee for political violence on leftists, the voiced intention to unlawfully report immigrants to risk of deportation- you get the idea.
yfk12
Degenerate who belongs on a cross
Also, context does matter quite a bit. For example, let's say I do a Pewdepie and shout "death to all Jews". While in incredibly bad taste, this wouldn't be all that bad. Now let's say I happen to be a member of the Klan, have a swastika tattoo, have a blog about how the Holocaust never happened and how white genocide is real, and have a nice shiny MAGA cap to cap it off. Suddenly, what I just said becomes a lot worse.