How smart are you?

Lazarus Plus said:
Jebus said:
Lazarus Plus said:
. But I read college history books in my free time, I often am in the middle of reading three or four books at any given time, I can read 500 page books in a day...

Dude, that's fucking sad.

Last thing I'd want to be doing right now is reading college history books. Yet sadly, I am.
But really: you're not supposed to waste your free time with that. It's unholy. Go enjoy your friggin' life, Streber.

I have a ridiculously high reading speed. Not like the speed readers you see on TV, but still, fast fast fast.

Also, I really love history. I think the best book I ever read was "The State and Society of the Byzantine Empire." Man that was a good one.

A College History book called "The State and Society of the Byzantine Empire"?

I didn't know there were colleges that devoted credits solely to the history of the Byzantines. That's some freaky colleges you guys have up there, aye.
 
Not sure we're thinking about the same thing, but if by credits you mean classes and an exam devoted to Byzantium, than, yup, I have those too, it's called "History of southeastern Europe in the middle ages" but it pretty much comes down to Byzantium. I have that exam in two weeks, BTW.
 
Dude, I wish I had that kind of history. Mine's all dry and mostly theoretic. Y'know - like world-systems, source decoding, paleonthology, scientific archaeology, etc. etc. Only a third of my credits is devoted to *actual* history.

Not that I don't have to cram crazy amounts of dates for those courses too, tho'. Just not as much as I would've liked too. Me wants more Napoleon and Byzantium, less sigillography and prosopography. More Rome and Louis XIV, less 'Defining Civilization' and 'Constraints of effective forms of society'.

Ah ye world, why are ye so cruel. Apparently my university has that whole 'teach them HOW to do stuff instead of just teaching them stuff' thing going. It might have its benefits - but damnit, it's no fun.
 
Ironically, I wouldn't mind at all switching with you right now. I'll have those too, but next year, and the stuff I'm doing right now is starting to annoy me severely.

EDIT: @John: :?:
 
Some anti-ADHD stuff. I get bored with IQ tests pretty quickly, that was the main reason. Especially when it's around 200 hours of testing (honest to God, it was, though I got a nice IEP out of it), and the tester is a Unitarian woman with 11 adopted Thai children and maybe 8 Cats that she called 'people'.

Anyway, on the anti-ADHD stuff it was around 154, without it was maybe 120.
 
DirtyDreamDesigner said:
Ironically, I wouldn't mind at all switching with you right now. I'll have those too, but next year, and the stuff I'm doing right now is starting to annoy me severely.

Well then, let's do so.
I'd like to learn more *history*, instead of all these history-related skillz.

I can put together a 50-title archive list containing the most relevant and trustworthy titles for any history research subject you'll ever find in record speed, tho'.
 
DirtyDreamDesigner said:
Wait, Ritalin is Mentats? Holy Shit!
Wait2, 200 hours of testing?
Wait3, how do you know so much about the tester?

No, not ritalin, it did not improve my IQ as much as it kept me vaugley interested in a very, very boring process.

200 hours of testing. Well, 200 hours at her house, all of which she was payed for.

I think that answers both 2 and 3?
 
John Uskglass said:
200 hours of testing. Well, 200 hours at her house, all of which she was payed for.

I think that answers both 2 and 3?

Oh, I get it, it all makes sense now; she drugged you, molested you for two hundred hours, told you she was just testing your IQ. and she got payed for it. You've been pwnd, Johnny.
 
Lazarus Plus said:
My SAT score slightly bore this out, as I did slightly above average in math and a few points from perfect in verbal, all without studying.
You can learn for SAT tests?
 
demonslayer said:
i dun need a IQ test to tell that i have a iQ above the normal people :twisted:
And a spelling beyond good and evil. :eyebrow:

However, I do not know. I never made a serious IQ-Test, and according to some online tests I'm plain stupid or ingenious (80 - 160).
I made a pretty good Abitur (~British A-levels) with the almost incredible mark of 2.0 and I study biology, so I can not be THAT stupid.
But I always failed to learn another foreign language.
 
Xenophobia is good for you.
And I believe you are very stupid because you study biology. I hate it. I hate it as much as I hate McFly, and Yankistan.
 
Dragonetti said:
Xenophobia is good for you.
And I believe you are very stupid because you study biology. I hate it. I hate it as much as I hate McFly, and Yankistan.
Yeah, I love you too
knuddel.gif
 
Sander said:
Lazarus Plus said:
My SAT score slightly bore this out, as I did slightly above average in math and a few points from perfect in verbal, all without studying.
You can learn for SAT tests?

You can study, yes.

It's best to "bone up", as it were, for tests by practicing difficult mathematics and... I don't know, reading a dictionary or something.
 
Back
Top