Doctor 0
Still Mildly Glowing
Yeah, most here have been searching for the ending days ago to see how shit it is. The people who will be rustled by this are located at Beth forums, Fallout subreddits, Twitter, ign comments section, etc
Yeah, most here have been searching for the ending days ago to see how shit it is. The people who will be rustled by this are located at Beth forums, Fallout subreddits, Twitter, ign comments section, etc
Heck, from what I have seen, most of the internet is bethesda land. People trying to have fallout 4 streams on youtube are shut down, many forums are banning you left and right just for mentioning the end. Absolute chaos and pretty disgraceful for a video game launch.
Heck, from what I have seen, most of the internet is bethesda land. People trying to have fallout 4 streams on youtube are shut down, many forums are banning you left and right just for mentioning the end. Absolute chaos and pretty disgraceful for a video game launch.
Hold on, let me look through my Youtube history, someone here posted something that will satisfy all your desires...
Let's see here.
Ah, here we go.
Hope this helps!
I don't know of it. I do know that a couple of guys were making a GroundZero mod for DOOM3 that put FO3 to shame. This [unfinished] mod is why I have DOOM3.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ewN2qBXQKXY
Troika's beautiful game [demo] was untitled [afaik].
I'm not sure who posted it first here, but it's rather telling. I can understand if people don't like being spoiled. That's totally fine. This sort of... moral outrage is pushing it a bit though.
I'm not sure who posted it first here, but it's rather telling. I can understand if people don't like being spoiled. That's totally fine. This sort of... moral outrage is pushing it a bit though.
Research has actually shown that being spoiled on the ending does not actually harm people's enjoyment of something, in fact in some cases it enhances it. A lot of "spoiler aversion" is simply the irrational belief that being spoiled will harm your enjoyment of something. I mean, generally for stories the value is in "how we get to the ending" not "what happens in the end"; the latter is pretty much the sole value only in moralistic fables and the like.
If those people get spoiled, that is entirely on them. No one forces you to be spoiled by leaks of a video game.I'm not sure who posted it first here, but it's rather telling. I can understand if people don't like being spoiled. That's totally fine. This sort of... moral outrage is pushing it a bit though.
And I replied that I never miss in Fallout or Fallout 2. (And I don't; nobody does. It's the PC handling the weapon, the player only selects the target.).
The third paragraph I just bolded perfectly captures how little you actually know about us, otherwise, you would not make such baseless judgements.And I replied that I never miss in Fallout or Fallout 2. (And I don't; nobody does. It's the PC handling the weapon, the player only selects the target.).
Ok, that may seem like quite a thrill to you (and maybe others) but can you few (and let's be realistic here you FO4 naysayers are the minoroty) at least understand why the majority of people find this manner of combat unneccaptable in this day and age?
I know most of you don't think bethsoft pays you enough fan tribute but you should be happy there's any. It's because of people like Todd Howard that the franchise retains any resemblance to the fallouts of old. I've heard that most of the big wigs wanted to take fallout out of the "future 50's", which for me would take away a great deal of appeal.
They put it on the other side of the U.S. For a reason. To not desecrate what you people hold so near and dear, and so you guys complain. (Unfeasible you say) Yet when they do have some sort of reference to the old game (I love Harold) or a character you guys freak out and hate it.
Story is a matter of opinion and machanics (combat) are a matter of taste.
Too bad your personal preferences are in the minoroty and Bethesda is considered (by most) one of the best RPG makers.