Well, you can throw some pink paint, sprinkles and put a ribbon on a turd, but in the end it still stays a turd.Those are still some pretty ugly morphs.
Well, you can throw some pink paint, sprinkles and put a ribbon on a turd, but in the end it still stays a turd.Those are still some pretty ugly morphs.
Is that 7.8 with or without inflation?
7.8 out of ten?
Fuck that noise.
5 tops.
How low have we fallen?
8 out of ten is Fallout/Homeworld level writing.
10 out of ten is more like...I dunno...H.G Wells?
Lots of people like Shrek it seems.
7.8 out of ten?
Fuck that noise.
5 tops.
How low have we fallen?
8 out of ten is Fallout/Homeworld level writing.
10 out of ten is more like...I dunno...H.G Wells?
You give Fallout an 8 out of 10?
That's terrible.
8 out of 10 means a good but not great game. Which I and a bunch of other folk believe to be the case. A Silver Medal. Not a Gold Medal.
10 out of 10 for Fallout 1.
10 is PERFECT.
Fallout is a lovely game, easily one of my favourite, but it has FLAWS.
Flaws which might not be TERRIBLE, but they exist.
Ergo, not a 10 out of 10.
Any company which dares to release garbage day 1, is not a company I want to fund.
Gearbox did the same, and they were added to my shitlist of devs to not pay money to.
EA is already on that list, so Mass Defect wasn't even on my 'consideration to purchase' list.
All video game companies suck but I appreciate the work of their employees.
I can't give 2 fucks about some dickheads coding all day to sell me garbage while their overlords make millions.
Yes, which is why good games should be evaluated on their own merits.