Not "likely". I saw that the document was a proposed order and stated as much in the newspost.
That said, shows me to rely on someone like frymuchan for court interpretations. I know I've had academic-level Law-schooling, but everyone should be able to see the difference between a proposed order and a court order.
Yip. I overestimated his ability to read basic legalise. No wonder he's so ecstatic about Interplay's court standings; if you don't understand what's going on, you can always give a positive spin.
Yip. I overestimated his ability to read basic legalise. No wonder he's so ecstatic about Interplay's court standings; if you don't understand what's going on, you can always give a positive spin.
Here's a snapshot of the actual unsigned proposal document made that made Fry jump to the conclusion he did. The other court documents were signed but I will not be posting them here for such an ungrateful bunch of miscreants.
Hopefully, humans can understand the following prospective: If this was the last page you read after reading 100+ court documents and your eyes were tired from reading especially when it is not your profession, then it would be easy to understand how something so obvious in retrospect can be easily missed but some people cannot help themselves from mocking out of habit or ulterior motive.
Then again, miscreants who don't even bother to read 1-2 page length posts on this forum are always the ones to cast the first hypocritical stone since they are the ones who tend to always have a warped view of those that put in the time to read 100 pages more than them.
Can the people who accuse everyone here of blind Bethesda hatred and the people who accuse everyone here of blind Interplay hatred please get a room or something.
Can the people who accuse everyone here of blind Bethesda hatred and the people who accuse everyone here of blind Interplay hatred please get a room or something.
Here's a snapshot of the actual unsigned proposal document made that made Fry jump to the conclusion he did. The other court documents were signed but I will not be posting them here for such an ungrateful bunch of miscreants.
An unsigned court document is an unsigned court document and means nothing without a signature. Besides which, the order starts with "[PROPOSED]" so it's even harder to misinterpret. Of course people are going to be irritated or upset when a source provides bad information, especially if they appear to have a habit of doing so.
Here's a snapshot of the actual unsigned proposal document made that made Fry jump to the conclusion he did. The other court documents were signed but I will not be posting them here for such an ungrateful bunch of miscreants.
No. That document is very, very obvious. I glanced once at it and saw it was a proposed order. Anyone with even the most basic legal schooling would be able to do that, but even someone with basic reading skills should. Frymuchan could not, and stated the ruling had been made. I assumed - and that's my bad - that he's a reliable person despite his obvious bias and was getting this from another source. Because of that, NMA posted something blatantly false. I'm not happy about that, and while it's my fault for trusting frymuchan at his word, which I obviously won't be doing again, it's not like his part in it can be absolved.
The hearing is scheduled to take place sometime in December( unless there are new findings, requests or settlements between the two companies between now and then.
