Israel-Palestinians situation

sunny jim said:
november, yeah. exactly... all the "ideas" he gave are slogans too... except those who are rediculous....so don't you say i didn't notice them... it's just that there's not much to comment of, like i said before-slogans.

You are impossible, common man, Sander gave you the examples you asked for. What do you want more? He is not your government to show you a full program on how to fix this situation, he simply showed you some ideas, but you adopted the "slogan" concept. What do you understand by "slogan"?

I hate this topic. I knew it will come to this. No offense but you and all of your kind are acting as a victims throughout the world, hoping the people will show you compassion and they will choose your point of view. After all this useless talk you still can't picture the whole image.
 
Okay, fuck this, I can't stay out of a political debate that has some potential, not when there are so few to begin with
sunny jim said:
november, yeah. exactly... all the "ideas" he gave are slogans too...
Whether or not they are doesn't matter, because your remarks of "slogans" is standing in the way of actually looking at the content of these ideas. "They're slogans" doesn't mean they're bad, you know. But hey, if you want more ideas, I'll get back to that later.

except those who are rediculous... give them money... heh, besides the fact that the money they get(from arab nations and international support they have or don't) does fuel terrorists, and it was proven too many times before
Yes, when Arafat actually held power. Whether or not you need to do this now is another matter, but if Arafat dies, the Palestinian government will probably have very few contacts with the terrorists left. Whether you like it or not, supporting that government and making sure that that government then spends it on such things as jobs, house construction, welfare and whatnot is a really good way of making them more friendly towards you.

we don't have money to give them! all the money we have-we need.
Bullshit. Israel may not be one of the richest countries in the world, it's still a hell of a lot richer than Palestinia and should therefore easily be able to afford to give them money.

and sander, don't you think it's QUITE rediculous to ask money or else we'll murder your people?
What the bloody bloody BLOODY hell does this have to do with anything. I didn't say anything that came even close to this rubbish.
See what I mean by not READING what I say.

support the goverment? what do you mean? explain yourself...
For one acknowledging it, giving it support to continue on a peaceful road, supporting it in trying to stop the terrorists, because they do not support them.
Those are a few very abstract things but I'm sure that anyone with a bit more knowledge of the exact situation could come up with some more concrete things to help the current Palestinian government, because it's better to have a government than none at all.

"help build a better world"- it doesn't get more slogan than this... totally useless remark...
Hah. That's one of the most useful remarks and a remark everyone should adhere to, and why? Because the Israelis are currently NOT thinking about a better world for the rest of the world, but for themselves. Learn to help those Palestinians and learn to make THEIR lives a better place, because, I repeat again, that's the only way you'll not get slaughtered.

violently towards palestinians? you know, shit happens, but it's not like we do it on a regular basis... sure incidents happen, as angry soldiers unleash their wrath. this can't be avoided, because of all the reasons lauren said... i don't support it! but it's just because not everyone can hold back, and it's part of human nature. you can't demand a change, uneless you think humans are robots, or unless they stop reasons to hate them.
Bah. "Shit happens so it's cool." NO, it's NOT cool. You know what the Israeli government should do?
1) Issue a fine for every discriminatory remark made (as long as it wasn't in jest).
2) Strictly forbid ANY military personnel to treat Palestinians as a lower form of life under punishment of prison (unless, of course, the Palestinian is trying to blow them up).
3) Strictly forbid the military personnel to use violence on anyone, unless in self-defense or to make sure someone abides by the rules.
4) Start a campaign to strongly discourage any form of discrimination or violence towards Palestinians.
Those are some really concrete examples that would work, if executed properly. Because diminishing the hatred between people is one of the few sure-fire ways to diminish violence.
And you dismiss that with "shit happens".

antipathy? what lauren said.
Look, you do realise I'm advising the Israelis what to do now, don't you? That means that I'm NOT advising the Palestinians, because the first thing THEY need to do is stop the suicide bombing, stop endorsing terrorists and stop the hate-mongering. But hey, you're not a Palestinian, and I'm talking to YOU now.
Look, whether you like it or not, things have to start somewhere, and if you're not willing to make the effort without knowing whether the other side will, why would the other side be interested in making an effort?

And I'll give you a few other things to do:
- Don't continue the retaliation missions, checks are fine, if not done as violently as I've seen, security is fine, assassinations on the dangerous terrorist leaders are fine, but NOT the fucking retaliation missions, because for all the terrorists you kill there, you create more potential terrorists in their family members, and you create even more by the accidental deaths you cause.
- Start caring about what the rest of the world thinks of you, because a strong foreign opinion is the basis for any international relationship, and as you must've noticed, Israel isn't too popular.
- Don't build the wall over Palestinian land. You say "why not?". My response to that, is that it creates more hatred. There's no need whatsoever to build it over Palestinian land, so why are you building there?

i forgot to say to sander about how wrong it is for him to think that our actions don't prevent terrorist attack. so that you'll know, a lot more than 90 percent of the tries for terror are spotted, and ever since we moved forces into their territories(about a year ago i think), the suicide bombings attackes dropped from a few each week to less than once a month, and there were times of no incidents inside the borders for many months...
Now this, I did not know. Are there any studies or articles you can link me to, because this is good.

extremists on both sides? oh really? commmon man... please be serious... a bit...
Hah. Apparently you don't know your own country, there are plenty of Israeli extremists, you just don't see them as extremists because you (partially) agree with them. No, they aren't conducting suicide attacks, but that doesn't mean they aren't extreme.

half a century to work this out... pretty hard when the other side doesn't cooperate. the terrorists deny our existense, and they will consider coexistence as an option. like i said millions of times. noone to make peace with, when the terrorists are still here. the terrorists don't want us to help them, they want us gone. sander, sadly you can't understand this... and you don't understand that even if we give them money, and be kind with them, and treat them like people, and "support the goverment"(what the hell does that mean?), the terrorists will still be here.
We all understand that, but what we also understand is that they won't go away if you keep killing Palestinians and keep offending them. As you said yourself, there will be more Palestinians than Israelis in about 50-100 years if everything keeps going on this rate, so why do you think that killing them will have any effect?
You see, the more terrorists that are killed, the more rise up and retaliate.
The only way out of that vicious circle is to diminish popular support for them to such a low that they have no way of working anymore, and that can only happen through friendliness, not hatred and fear.

my point exactly... you also touched another thing, about the education. unlike that ignorant jerk who said students in israel are brainwashed, i saw on tv, in the news, classrooms with small children in palestine, where the teachers chant together with them things like "kill all israelis" or "death to zionism"... spreading hatred from age 0.
Proof. I'll believe that there are classrooms where this happens, but not that it happens frequently or that it's spread out over the population without any form of proof, just like I won't believe you were brainwashed by your teachers.

too bad sander doesn't understand, that it's not like the terrorists are fighting for their rights, and for a nation of their own. they are fighting to annihilate us.
As I've said many times before: READ what the fuck I SAY, and DO NOT ATTACH MEANINGS TO MY WORDS THAT AREN'T THERE. This supposition is insulting, stupid and bullshit.
 
this is in reply to the one who posted that article:
well... you know... it probably is a waste of time of me, to comment over this totally subjective report, as it's very easy to mutilate millons of facts, and for me to explain why they are wrong... but what tha heck? :)

this example of the girl you brought over here, is simply a wonderful one to what happens when you bring only part of the facts, but not all of them.
let me give you ALL THE FACTS. that outpost she approached was no "some outpost" like rediculously put in that artice, but it was a military outpost in a restricted area, not close at all to palestinian borders(by foot at least) an by NO MEANS on the way to any school. that girl left the territories, went 400 meters into the restricted area with a bag. when the soldiers used a speaker to tell her to back off, she still approached. when they fired the warning shots in the air, she still continued approaching, and then she threw the bag at the outpost. when children smaller in age than her are caught with explosives belts, there's no reason to believe she's not a genuine threat. the soldiers had no choice but to follow regulations, so they had to kill her. why did it take 20 bullets you ask? because she was shot at from many different locations simultaniously, and because of the automatic rate of fire. yes, the bag had school books in it, but it's almost certain she was used as a diversion for a terrorist attack.
so don't you bullshit they were near "some outpost" on their way to school... a restriced area is what it is...

about "israeli have a right to defend themselves" and the israeli terrorists 50 years ago things, i'm sorry, but the artice you quoted was written by either somone retarted, or by someone who is an antisemite... idiotic remarks which are made to insult the inteligence of the human race.
if you want to have a serious discussion, you better bring true and accurate points and not idiotic blurbs.

now in reply to sander:
i'm very happy that we're making progress. and start seeing things some eye to eye here in some points...

Whether or not they are doesn't matter, because your remarks of "slogans" is standing in the way of actually looking at the content of these ideas. "They're slogans" doesn't mean they're bad, you know. But hey, if you want more ideas, I'll get back to that later.
when i say slogans, i don't mean they are bad. i mean that they can't be inplemented because you don't give a way to inplement them. sure, those ideas are could be good potentially, but how exactly do you make them work? some of the things you say are not practical.


Yes, when Arafat actually held power. Whether or not you need to do this now is another matter, but if Arafat dies, the Palestinian government will probably have very few contacts with the terrorists left. Whether you like it or not, supporting that government and making sure that that government then spends it on such things as jobs, house construction, welfare and whatnot is a really good way of making them more friendly towards you.

Quote:
we don't have money to give them! all the money we have-we need.

Bullshit. Israel may not be one of the richest countries in the world, it's still a hell of a lot richer than Palestinia and should therefore easily be able to afford to give them money.

you simply don't know our financial state. i don't know if you really want to get into this, but it's a bit complicated and it will take a big effort to explain why we simply can't support another country, couse we have a real trouble supporting ours. in a few words, right now we have more than 15 percent of people without jobs, a lot more people who can't support their families, and a thriving poverty. we have to take care of ourselves first before we can adress to others, and we haven't done that yet. if you wanna check this thing out, just search the net for our economic state.

What the bloody bloody BLOODY hell does this have to do with anything. I didn't say anything that came even close to this rubbish.
See what I mean by not READING what I say.

what i meant was, that we're trying to solve the problem of terrorism here, and the thing of giving them money is not supposed to be any way to help preventing terrorism(making their lives better)

For one acknowledging it, giving it support to continue on a peaceful road, supporting it in trying to stop the terrorists, because they do not support them.
Those are a few very abstract things but I'm sure that anyone with a bit more knowledge of the exact situation could come up with some more concrete things to help the current Palestinian government, because it's better to have a government than none at all.

we always did acknowledge it. that's why we had talks with them. helping them stop terrorism is not practical, because not only they are not trying to do so, they simply can't. we're stopping terrorism by ourselves.

Hah. That's one of the most useful remarks and a remark everyone should adhere to, and why? Because the Israelis are currently NOT thinking about a better world for the rest of the world, but for themselves. Learn to help those Palestinians and learn to make THEIR lives a better place, because, I repeat again, that's the only way you'll not get slaughtered.

i didn't express myself properly... sorry. it's useful alright! but how exactly is it practical? it's easy to say "do this and that", but we can't if there's no way to do it.

Bah. "Shit happens so it's cool." NO, it's NOT cool. You know what the Israeli government should do?
1) Issue a fine for every discriminatory remark made (as long as it wasn't in jest).
2) Strictly forbid ANY military personnel to treat Palestinians as a lower form of life under punishment of prison (unless, of course, the Palestinian is trying to blow them up).
3) Strictly forbid the military personnel to use violence on anyone, unless in self-defense or to make sure someone abides by the rules.
4) Start a campaign to strongly discourage any form of discrimination or violence towards Palestinians.
Those are some really concrete examples that would work, if executed properly. Because diminishing the hatred between people is one of the few sure-fire ways to diminish violence.
And you dismiss that with "shit happens".

huh? what do you mean "it;s cool" i didn't say that... i said it's something of human nature when there are those who can't hold themselves back. an example can be criminals or rapists in every country, which are that ugly part of society which will never be prevented, unless we'll become prophets.
as for punishing those who do that, don't think you're the only smart guy here:) all those points(1, 2 ,3 ,4) you maid, exist from day one. it was NEVER legal to do that, and all who did abuse palastinians were punished exactly like they should have.
it was always forbiden to use violence when it wasn't needed. the thing is rules are meant to be broken :) there will always be those exepcional who will brake the rules. it can't be avoided, it's the human factor.


Look, you do realise I'm advising the Israelis what to do now, don't you? That means that I'm NOT advising the Palestinians, because the first thing THEY need to do is stop the suicide bombing, stop endorsing terrorists and stop the hate-mongering. But hey, you're not a Palestinian, and I'm talking to YOU now.
that's the thing... even if we did all you said(some things are just not practical, but even if), they still have to do all the things you said they should do. and if they did that, there would be a palastinian country besides ours about 50 years ago...

- Don't build the wall over Palestinian land. You say "why not?". My response to that, is that it creates more hatred. There's no need whatsoever to build it over Palestinian land, so why are you building there?

1. there's no exactly "palastinian land" they don't have any formal land... there's our formal land, and there's no-owner land.
2. "1" is not really relevant, because we have to bulid this wall which will help to prevent borders from being breached, and if you looked at the map of israel, and saw our lands, and their lands, you would see that building a wall is very problematic, and some of our lands will be sacrificed for them, and some of theirs for us. that's no excuse not to bulild a wall because of it(there's no way to bulid a wall whiich won't hinder them AND us...)

Now this, I did not know. Are there any studies or articles you can link me to, because this is good.

i don't know if statistics were documented, but you'll just have to take my word for it if you won't find any. i really do know what i'm talking about, as those suicide bombings just can't be overlooked, and we notice everyone of them BIGTIME when it happens, so we know when it's often, and when it's rare. anyway, this is simply a fact. i'm not fooling you, don't worry:) if you'll try to find out for yourself, you'll see i'm totally right. just in order to be sure of what i said, and not give you inaccurate info, i asked other people and they told me exactly those numbers.

about the thing of the "90 percent of terrorist attacks prevented", it's a fact cause it was on the news... i didn't read it on the net, i watched it on live news so i can't find it for you, again, you'll just have to take my word for it...

Hah. Apparently you don't know your own country, there are plenty of Israeli extremists, you just don't see them as extremists because you (partially) agree with them. No, they aren't conducting suicide attacks, but that doesn't mean they aren't extreme.
you said it yourself... "no, they aren't conducting suicide atacks"... they can be "extremists" all they want to, and they can have protests all they want to, but when they don't actually DO anything that's harmful, except saying stuff like "burn all arabs", they are pretty much harmless. all those extremist parties are against the law btw, any many of those fools are behind bars. the only incident of actually a terror act on our behalf, was about 8-10 years ago when a crazy religious idiot(last name goldstein) took an automatic weapon and emptied it on innocent palestinian prayers in a church... don't compare our "extremists" with theirs because of this.

We all understand that, but what we also understand is that they won't go away if you keep killing Palestinians and keep offending them. As you said yourself, there will be more Palestinians than Israelis in about 50-100 years if everything keeps going on this rate, so why do you think that killing them will have any effect?
You see, the more terrorists that are killed, the more rise up and retaliate.
The only way out of that vicious circle is to diminish popular support for them to such a low that they have no way of working anymore, and that can only happen through friendliness, not hatred and fear.
when you say "killing palestinians", what do you mean? the "retaliation missions"? they are not retaliation missions. they are missions which are meant to prevent further incidents of the sort which were done to provoke them(the missions), and like i said, they work like magic. but let's leave that alone.
even if i pretend for a sec that we "kill palestiniants and offend them", you do understand that if we won't do that, terror WILL be the same right? you contradict yourself... just read what you commented on, and then read your comment and you'll see that.
about the 50-100 years thing, that's what's the wall for, and WE DON'T KILL PALASTINIANS! stop saying that for no reason. we kill terrorists, and sometimes innocents get killed too, but that can't be avoided if we want to find terror. if you don't believe me, then you must think you know better than generals and commanders of what could be the best army in the world in fighting terrorist. in our military actions, we think of the option of innocents getting hurt, and we're taking mesures to make it as less as possible, but it's usually not possibe to be totally unavoidable, because of the terrorist's way of fighting us, which includes hiding in civillian homes, and using little children as human shields, and forcing the battle zones to be civillian city streets. you see?


Proof. I'll believe that there are classrooms where this happens, but not that it happens frequently or that it's spread out over the population without any form of proof, just like I won't believe you were brainwashed by your teachers.
fair enough... you have a point there. i can't assume that all schools work this way over there just because i saw that happen a few times on tv. the small difference is, that you won't find ONE time, for that to happen in israel.

As I've said many times before: READ what the fuck I SAY, and DO NOT ATTACH MEANINGS TO MY WORDS THAT AREN'T THERE. This supposition is insulting, stupid and bullshit.

sorry, but that's just what i assume from what you say. if you read this whole topic from start to finish, you'll see why.
 
you simply don't know our financial state. i don't know if you really want to get into this, but it's a bit complicated and it will take a big effort to explain why we simply can't support another country, couse we have a real trouble supporting ours. in a few words, right now we have more than 15 percent of people without jobs, a lot more people who can't support their families, and a thriving poverty. we have to take care of ourselves first before we can adress to others, and we haven't done that yet. if you wanna check this thing out, just search the net for our economic state.
Okay, I'll say it again:
Palestinian state= completely fucked finanically. Israel= not really good, but still way better than Palestine. This means that you CAN give money to the Palestinians.
what i meant was, that we're trying to solve the problem of terrorism here, and the thing of giving them money is not supposed to be any way to help preventing terrorism(making their lives better)
Tou're again not READING what I am saying (writing). I'm NOT saying you should make the lives of the terrorists better, I'm saying you should make the lives of the ORDINARY Palestinians better.

we always did acknowledge it. that's why we had talks with them.
Latest statement by a representative of Israel: we are not working towards a Palestinian state. Yes, that's really acknowledging it and supporting it.,...</sarcasm>
helping them stop terrorism is not practical, because not only they are not trying to do so, they simply can't. we're stopping terrorism by ourselves.
So, basically, you think it's better to fight terrorists on your own than with allies. Interesting logic...

i didn't express myself properly... sorry. it's useful alright! but how exactly is it practical? it's easy to say "do this and that", but we can't if there's no way to do it.
"it's all about the money, it's all about the dum-dum-dum-dum-dee-dum".

huh? what do you mean "it;s cool" i didn't say that... i said it's something of human nature when there are those who can't hold themselves back. an example can be criminals or rapists in every country, which are that ugly part of society which will never be prevented, unless we'll become prophets.
as for punishing those who do that, don't think you're the only smart guy here:) all those points(1, 2 ,3 ,4) you maid, exist from day one. it was NEVER legal to do that, and all who did abuse palastinians were punished exactly like they should have.
If you really believe that, you're more ignorant than I thought.

it was always forbiden to use violence when it wasn't needed. the thing is rules are meant to be broken Smile there will always be those exepcional who will brake the rules. it can't be avoided, it's the human factor.
"It's human nature, so we shouldn't worry about it."
Bullshit. Campaign against abuse, also campaign against dsicriminatory REMARKS as well, and especially do this amongst the soldiers guarding the borders who deal with the terrorists. And make sure that those rules are obeyed. If a soldier is NOT friendly with a Palestinian he should be punished, because those soldiers are the face of Israel towards Palestina, and they should make as good an impression as possible. And right now, every Palestinian is complaining about the way they are treated at the borders, they claim they're treated like dogs, and I've seen

1. there's no exactly "palastinian land" they don't have any formal land... there's our formal land, and there's no-owner land.
2. "1" is not really relevant, because we have to bulid this wall which will help to prevent borders from being breached, and if you looked at the map of israel, and saw our lands, and their lands, you would see that building a wall is very problematic, and some of our lands will be sacrificed for them, and some of theirs for us. that's no excuse not to bulild a wall because of it(there's no way to bulid a wall whiich won't hinder them AND us...)
How about: don't build it so that Palestinians are seperated from their own farmland, don't build it so that Palestinians are living in Israel, don't build it where there are currently settlements. There are a lot of places where this isn't happening, and that's the entire problem. The wall is being built on places where it hinders the Palestinians a lot, but where it wouldn't hurt at all to move it so that the Palestinians aren't hindered.
i don't know if statistics were documented, but you'll just have to take my word for it if you won't find any. i really do know what i'm talking about, as those suicide bombings just can't be overlooked, and we notice everyone of them BIGTIME when it happens, so we know when it's often, and when it's rare. anyway, this is simply a fact. i'm not fooling you, don't worry:) if you'll try to find out for yourself, you'll see i'm totally right. just in order to be sure of what i said, and not give you inaccurate info, i asked other people and they told me exactly those numbers.

about the thing of the "90 percent of terrorist attacks prevented", it's a fact cause it was on the news... i didn't read it on the net, i watched it on live news so i can't find it for you, again, you'll just have to take my word for it...
Ugh. Please, I'm willing to believe you, but not if you come up with such completely senseless statements like "It's true because it's on the news." That's just silly.

you said it yourself... "no, they aren't conducting suicide atacks"... they can be "extremists" all they want to, and they can have protests all they want to, but when they don't actually DO anything that's harmful, except saying stuff like "burn all arabs", they are pretty much harmless. all those extremist parties are against the law btw, any many of those fools are behind bars. the only incident of actually a terror act on our behalf, was about 8-10 years ago when a crazy religious idiot(last name goldstein) took an automatic weapon and emptied it on innocent palestinian prayers in a church... don't compare our "extremists" with theirs because of this.
So, basically, according to you, people can't be extremists unless they commit violent acts. So the Nazis weren't extremist until they started killing people?
And I'm not saying they're any better, or worse, but I'm saying that they are there.
Remember that Rabin was assassinated by an Israeli and not a Palestinian extremist.

when you say "killing palestinians", what do you mean? the "retaliation missions"? they are not retaliation missions. they are missions which are meant to prevent further incidents of the sort which were done to provoke them(the missions), and like i said, they work like magic. but let's leave that alone.
No, let's not. I've seen and heard it often enough, Israel DOES conduct retaliation missions after a terrorist Palestinian act, and those aren't just meant to prevent terrorist attacks, they're meant to scare the terrorists into not doing that again. Of course, it doesn't work, it just causes more hatred.

even if i pretend for a sec that we "kill palestiniants and offend them", you do understand that if we won't do that, terror WILL be the same right? you contradict yourself... just read what you commented on, and then read your comment and you'll see that.
No, I don't. You know, just saying something is so, won't suddenly make it so.
It's quite simple: Palestinians do get killed because of Israeli attacks, and those attacks aren't always necessary, especialy not those retaliation missions.

about the 50-100 years thing, that's what's the wall for
So you honestly think that it's impossible now for a Palestinian to come in and commit those suicide attacks? As you must've noticed at 9/11, terrorists are very ingenious, and will find ways to seriously harm Israel.
and WE DON'T KILL PALASTINIANS! stop saying that for no reason. we kill terrorists, and sometimes innocents get killed too, but that can't be avoided if we want to find terror.
And now I'm the one contradicting yourself. Here's what you're saying "We don't kill Palestinians. [..]we kill terrorists[..]and innocents get killed[..]"
So from "We don't kill palestinians" you go to "innocents get killed" where the innocents are Palestinians. In other words, you're contradicting yourself.
Look, I've been saying all along you kill Palestinian innocents, though not on purpose, and that that should be prevented as much as possible, and one of the ways of doing that is stopping those retaliations.

in our military actions, we think of the option of innocents getting hurt, and we're taking mesures to make it as less as possible, but it's usually not possibe to be totally unavoidable, because of the terrorist's way of fighting us, which includes hiding in civillian homes, and using little children as human shields, and forcing the battle zones to be civillian city streets. you see?
I've seen that all along, and I'm not contradicting that.

fair enough... you have a point there. i can't assume that all schools work this way over there just because i saw that happen a few times on tv. the small difference is, that you won't find ONE time, for that to happen in israel.
Wanna bet?
I seriously doubt that this happens nowhere, but I won't assume it's so. Besides, it doesn't matter for the argument here anyway.
 
Just a quick reply to what you stated on the top Sander before im off to work.

Sander the answear man said:
]Okay, I'll say it again:
Palestinian state= completely fucked finanically. Israel= not really good, but still way better than Palestine. This means that you CAN give money to the Palestinians.

So Israel has more money than Palestine and therefore have it better, and should therefore give Palestine some of their hard earned money. Hmm okay...good reasoning there Sander I mean it.
Holland has it better than Palestine so according to you Holland should give Palestine some money because they have it better. Now since Taiwan has it better its probably right if they chip in with some cash there too, I mean, they got more money.

Or maybe you think Israel should bribe Palestine with some cold cash to stop the suicide bombings, but heres the million dollar question, where should Israel get that money from?
Raise the tax! oops cant do that, Israel already charges tax for just about everything. The size of your house, borrowing a book in a library etc. So thats outta the question.
What else do we have? Well they could lower the budget of the military, of course this would give the terrorists an upper hand to attack if they feel the money isnt enough or if thats not what they wanted at all. So thats a no too. What else is there then? Job opportunities? Woops, there are none.
Pull out troops from palestine and give terrorists a chance to expand? Well sure, you save money but in the end you loose.

Well I got no answear to this. Sander wants Israel to lower the welfare of Israel as little as it is and give it to Palestine who murder and kill their children because it will improve relations with the country and stop the terrorists. Hope your right.

Stay tuned for an explanation by Sander about how much I misread what he wrote and what an ignorant fool I am for misreading it and being allowed to live.
 
sunny jim said:
why did it take 20 bullets you ask? because she was shot at from many different locations simultaniously, and because of the automatic rate of fire. yes, the bag had school books in it, but it's almost certain she was used as a diversion for a terrorist attack.[/quote]



OMG YOU SICK PUPPY. SHE WAS SHOT 19 times by the unit's commander at close range when she was on the ground.

you know what, screw this, you guys DO fucking deserve each other.
I don't have the time nor the patience to listen to some sick fucko that says that MURDERING a 14 year old girl on her way to school is justified.
 
stan.jpg
 
So Israel has more money than Palestine and therefore have it better, and should therefore give Palestine some of their hard earned money. Hmm okay...good reasoning there Sander I mean it.
Holland has it better than Palestine so according to you Holland should give Palestine some money because they have it better. Now since Taiwan has it better its probably right if they chip in with some cash there too, I mean, they got more money.
Actually, yes, it is. And in fact, that's what's happening as well, since the richer a country is, the more money it tends to give to poorer nations.
Or maybe you think Israel should bribe Palestine with some cold cash to stop the suicide bombings, but heres the million dollar question, where should Israel get that money from?
And indeed, here it comes: learn to READ what the fuck I SAY. This is now the second time I'm saing that that is NOT what I am saying. Do NOT get into a discussion unless you properly read what is said, and have the brains to be able to come up with a decent response. You lack both.

Raise the tax! oops cant do that, Israel already charges tax for just about everything. The size of your house, borrowing a book in a library etc. So thats outta the question.
So because Israel charges taxes for a lot of things, it can't raise taxes. That's an interesting and obviously completely moronic reasoning.

What else do we have? Well they could lower the budget of the military, of course this would give the terrorists an upper hand to attack if they feel the money isnt enough or if thats not what they wanted at all. So thats a no too.
Lowering the budget != removing the military or even downsizing it.

What else is there then? Job opportunities? Woops, there are none.
I didn't job opportunities equated money these days...

Pull out troops from palestine and give terrorists a chance to expand? Well sure, you save money but in the end you loose.
1) Pulling out from Palestine would give the PALESTINIANS a chance to expand, not the terrorists. It's not like those terrorists have any base which they can expand.
2) How exactly would they loose? That land isn't bringing in any money whatsoever, nor is it good for their safety, because all more land means, is that you have more land to defend and protect.

Well I got no answear to this. Sander wants Israel to lower the welfare of Israel as little as it is and give it to Palestine
Yes. And if you'd look at the reasons, you'd realise that's a good idea. Mainly because any life is better than no life.
who murder and kill their children
Yes, really, that palestinian government is really using money to kill its own citizens, and those citizens are, of course, also systematically murdering their own children.
In case you're such a big moron that you can't notice that was sarcasm: it was sarcasm.

because it will improve relations with the country and stop the terrorists. Hope your right.
Yep.

Stay tuned for an explanation by Sander about how much I misread what he wrote and what an ignorant fool I am for misreading it and being allowed to live.
Wow, you're actually right for once. You know, it's real easy to prevent me from doing so. You could:
- Start reading what I type.
- Buy yourself a pair of brains with an IQ of over 80. That would help.
- Not get into discussions without proper arguments.
- Not seek me out all over the board because, for some reason or another, you hate me.

Oh, and yes, I AM being an asshole, and yes, you deserve it.
 
And yes your a big pile of apendrol.

There are terrorist schools for kids to become suiciders so they can honour that god or whatever reason they have.

Sander said:
I didn't job opportunities equated money these days... [/quoted]

I dont quite understand what you wrote there, but im gonna take it as you have a lower iq than me.

And how am I suppose to know your joking or making a sarcastic comment when you dont use smileys or any of the such u idiot. Its plain text and comes out as the way I believe it to be wich in your case is useless and stupid much like yourself.

Israel charges tax for everything to afford the military what else reason is there imbecile?
Also, I havent seen many big donations from any nations in a while´. Definently not from Holland.
 
And yes your a big pile of apendrol.
Thank you. It's real nice to know that I have "a big pile of apendrol". (For you non-Dutchies, apendrol means an ape's turd. Strong words, huh?)

There are terrorist schools for kids to become suiciders so they can honour that god or whatever reason they have.
No shit, sherlock. But those aren't funded by the government, now are they.

I dont quite understand what you wrote there, but im gonna take it as you have a lower iq than me.
Sorry about that. I forgot the word "know".

And how am I suppose to know your joking or making a sarcastic comment when you dont use smileys or any of the such
It's called intelligence.
u? WHat's that?
idiot. Its plain text and comes out as the way I believe it to be wich in your case is useless and stupid much like yourself.
Hah. You can't even insult people properly.
Israel charges tax for everything to afford the military what else reason is there imbecile?
And yet again, you can't read. Also, you do realise that just throwing in an insult at the end of every sentence isn't the same as intelligently and properly insulting people. Really, your lack of skills is amazing.
Now, what I wrote, is that the logic of not being able to raise the taxes because they already charge taxes for a lot of things is stupid. And then I wrote that cutting military budget is not the same as downsizing, it is the same as spending less money on such things as new weapons, research, nuclear weapons etc. which aren't all that useful against the terorists.

Also, I havent seen many big donations from any nations in a while´. Definently not from Holland.
Then you haven't been paying attention. Holland is one of the main supporters, both financially and morally, of Israel. Also note that we are one of the richest countries in the world, and spend a lot of money on supporting less fortunate countries. So yet again, you prove that you're incapable of doing proper research, coming up with decent arguments, or just plain being intelligent.
 
Word to the wise: Don't flame.

Word to the wise #2: Especially don't flame moderators. It doesn't matter whether they are the moderators of the specific forum you are in or not - just don't do it. If I see it, I will ban you. The admins might overrule me and reinstate you, of course, but I wouldn't count on it.

If you can't debate without calling someone an idiot, don't bother debating.

Oh, and snake is temp banned for 2 days - first and only warning.
 
not from sweden too :x :lol:


Palestinian state= completely fucked finanically. Israel= not really good, but still way better than Palestine. This means that you CAN give money to the Palestinians.

i still don't get this stand you take... first of all, the only way to know that the money we'll give them will be put to good use, is to spend it for them by ourselves. second, we're not supposed to be their benefactors! i don't get it how you came to this conclusion! this is so abstract... it's not even comunism what you say... in ANY CASE, this has nothing to do with the terrorist problem... it's like you have a mental block which prevents you from understanding that those are different issues, and it doesn't have anything to do with terrorists. without the terrorist problem, decisions can be made with their leadership, they can work inside our borders, and they won't have curfues, and then their financial state will become inevitably better.

Tou're again not READING what I am saying (writing). I'm NOT saying you should make the lives of the terrorists better, I'm saying you should make the lives of the ORDINARY Palestinians better.

AGAIN... different issues. in this conversation, we are trying to solve the terrorist problem, which will solve all the other problems, including this one. still, not much can be done while the terrorists are such a threat.

Latest statement by a representative of Israel: we are not working towards a Palestinian state. Yes, that's really acknowledging it and supporting it.

i have no idea where you got this from, but suppose it's true... it's right! you can't just put a bag on your head and say "let's work towards a palestinian state!", because they are in no state right now to declare themselves as a country. they wanna do it? fine by us, but we can't help them with this issue right now, because their cities are infested with terror. any kind of help will be welcomed with explosives and bullets from the terrorists, who's interest is not coexistence but us gone from here.

So, basically, you think it's better to fight terrorists on your own than with allies. Interesting logic...
you see what i'm talking about when i say you don't read what i say? there ARE NO ALLIES TO FIGHT THE TERRORISTS WITH!


"it's all about the money, it's all about the dum-dum-dum-dum-dee-dum".

NOT PRACTICAL!

If you really believe that, you're more ignorant than I thought.

well, then you problaly thought i was least ignorant person on the face of the earth :)

"It's human nature, so we shouldn't worry about it."
Bullshit. Campaign against abuse, also campaign against dsicriminatory REMARKS as well, and especially do this amongst the soldiers guarding the borders who deal with the terrorists. And make sure that those rules are obeyed. If a soldier is NOT friendly with a Palestinian he should be punished, because those soldiers are the face of Israel towards Palestina, and they should make as good an impression as possible. And right now, every Palestinian is complaining about the way they are treated at the borders, they claim they're treated like dogs, and I've seen

read what lauren said, you're repeating yourself.



How about: don't build it so that Palestinians are seperated from their own farmland, don't build it so that Palestinians are living in Israel, don't build it where there are currently settlements. There are a lot of places where this isn't happening, and that's the entire problem. The wall is being built on places where it hinders the Palestinians a lot, but where it wouldn't hurt at all to move it so that the Palestinians aren't hindered.

sigh...

what did i tell you? open the map of israel... did you open it? no sir! if you did, you wouldn't have written that irrelevent suggestion.
"do this, do that, and that, and that" NOT PRACTICAL. no way to be done... why don't YOU read posts sometimes?

Ugh. Please, I'm willing to believe you, but not if you come up with such completely senseless statements like "It's true because it's on the news." That's just silly.

i'm sorry, i'll rephrase myself. it's a fact, because i saw on the news, on tv, how the generals commanding those things stated the facts.
ok?


So, basically, according to you, people can't be extremists unless they commit violent acts. So the Nazis weren't extremist until they started killing people?
And I'm not saying they're any better, or worse, but I'm saying that they are there.
Remember that Rabin was assassinated by an Israeli and not a Palestinian extremist.

bah... too bad i love being polite...
fuck, do i need to remind you of all the things the nazis did before they started killing people?!
WE DON'T DO ANY KIND OF THAT SHIT! WE DON'T DO MASSIVE PARADES IN WHICH WE SHOUT "DEATH TO ARABS"!
there were a few insignificant fachist organizations which support these things, but the police scattered them quicky and their leaders are behind bars. we treat all terrorists of any kind the same.
so no, you can't compare, you can't say we have extremists just like they do. if you wanna do that, prove it, and you'll be wasting your time trying to.

No, let's not. I've seen and heard it often enough, Israel DOES conduct retaliation missions after a terrorist Palestinian act, and those aren't just meant to prevent terrorist attacks, they're meant to scare the terrorists into not doing that again. Of course, it doesn't work, it just causes more hatred.

we can't let them kill our citizens. and they do work, you're just ignorant, and you don't listen to the facts, that the terrors suffers heavy blows, and that their acts(those which succeed) are much less frequent. we defend ourselves, we don't attack. you think that if a bus full of citizens explodes in the middle of our street, we should do nothing about it, and that's madness... now you'lll probably say "i didn't say you shouldn't fight terror, i just said you should stop the retaliation missions". WHAT THE HELL DO YOU THINK THOSE MISSIONS ARE?!

Wanna bet?
I seriously doubt that this happens nowhere, but I won't assume it's so. Besides, it doesn't matter for the argument here anyway.
yeah, i do. i'll come to the netherlands and i'll do the chicken dance, with the costume and all.
just kidding:) ok, leaving that alone 8)
 
i still don't get this stand you take... first of all, the only way to know that the money we'll give them will be put to good use, is to spend it for them by ourselves.
Then do that. That would also be good.

econd, we're not supposed to be their benefactors!
Yes, you are. Or at least, you are supposed to be theor benefactors if you'd like this terrorist thing to END instead of drag on for ever and ever.

i don't get it how you came to this conclusion! this is so abstract... it's not even comunism what you say... in ANY CASE, this has nothing to do with the terrorist problem... it's like you have a mental block which prevents you from understanding that those are different issues, and it doesn't have anything to do with terrorists. without the terrorist problem, decisions can be made with their leadership, they can work inside our borders, and they won't have curfues, and then their financial state will become inevitably better.
No, they are not different issues, they are interlinked, and I've explained at least twice already why this is so. I won't go an explain it again, and I advise you to actually look at WHY I think they are interlinked, and attack my reasoning with facts and decent arguments instead of just shouting "NOT PRACTICAL!" or "you're wrong".

AGAIN... different issues. in this conversation, we are trying to solve the terrorist problem, which will solve all the other problems, including this one. still, not much can be done while the terrorists are such a threat.
No, you are NOT solving the terrorist problem, you are, eventually, causing more terrorist attacks, if not by the Palestinians, then by other Middle-Eastern groups.

i have no idea where you got this from, but suppose it's true
I got it from: NRC Handelsblad, Metro Nieuws, RTL4 nieuws, RTL-Z nieuws, NOS-nieuws, ANP, Reuters' Press Agency and the BBC News. Are those enough sources to make you believe it's true?

it's right! you can't just put a bag on your head and say "let's work towards a palestinian state!", because they are in no state right now to declare themselves as a country.
Perhaps not. But at the very least you could suport them in trying to become one, it would cost YOU nothing, and would gain you some goodwill from the Palestinian people.
they wanna do it? fine by us, but we can't help them with this issue right now,
yes, you can, by acknowledging it as a country, for instance, or by helping the government gain more control over their citizens.
because their cities are infested with terror. any kind of help will be welcomed with explosives and bullets from the terrorists, who's interest is not coexistence but us gone from here.
Yes, the terrorists' goal is. But any terrorist organisation, especially the ones in Palestinia, rely on popular support to help them succeed. If you manage to take away popular support, not only will there be less terrorists, but the terrorists will also be much less succesful and easier to root out. The only way to exterminate terrorism without taking away their popular support, which you're not doing, is killing every single Palestinian, and I really hope that you don't want to do that.

you see what i'm talking about when i say you don't read what i say? there ARE NO ALLIES TO FIGHT THE TERRORISTS WITH!
YES, THERE IS, THE PALESTINIAN GOVERNMENT! (I'm repeating myself)

NOT PRACTICAL!
Why don't you come up with an argument instead of just stating things as if they are the truth, because a statement is certainly not the same as a decent argument, especially not when you're not supporting the statement with anything.

read what lauren said, you're repeating yourself.
I read what lauren almost as soon as she posted. That doesn't have anything to do with what I'm saying, though, because you completely skip by anything which might be remotely valid with such a nonsensical statement.
Look, I'll say it again, to succeed, you need goodwill from the Palestinians, one of the main ways of doing that is stopping the border guards from being so degrading towards the Palestinians. And whether or not these border guards have a "right" to be pissed off has NOTHING to do with this matter, because their being pissed off isn't going to save ANYONE nor is it going to bring back anyone.

what did i tell you? open the map of israel... did you open it? no sir!
Actually, I DID. Don't make assumptions.

if you did, you wouldn't have written that irrelevent suggestion.
"do this, do that, and that, and that" NOT PRACTICAL. no way to be done... why don't YOU read posts sometimes?
I DO read posts. But I also have the ability to discern between a statement and an argument, "NOT PRACTICAL" or "no way to be done" is in no way, shape or form an argument, it's just a statement that I disagree with. And you haven't shown me ONE argument as to WHY this is impractical or WHY it can't be done.

i'm sorry, i'll rephrase myself. it's a fact, because i saw on the news, on tv, how the generals commanding those things stated the facts.
ok?
Whatever happened to a critical state of the mind? Really, don't be so gullible, just because some general states that it is so, doesn't actually make it so, at the most, it means that the general wants you believe it's so. Whether or not it IS so is a completely different matter, and that's why studies and research are conducted.

bah... too bad i love being polite...
fuck, do i need to remind you of all the things the nazis did before they started killing people?!
WE DON'T DO ANY KIND OF THAT SHIT! WE DON'T DO MASSIVE PARADES IN WHICH WE SHOUT "DEATH TO ARABS"!
AND I DIDN'T SAY YOU DID.

there were a few insignificant fachist organizations which support these things, but the police scattered them quicky and their leaders are behind bars. we treat all terrorists of any kind the same.
I'd rather hope so, otherwise you'd be in a hell of a lot more trouble.
so no, you can't compare, you can't say we have extremists just like they do.
I never said you did. NEVER.

if you wanna do that, prove it, and you'll be wasting your time trying to.
I don't want to do that. ALL I am saying, really ALL, is that there are extremists in Israel. Is that really that hard to accept.

we can't let them kill our citizens.
And I never said you should.
and they do work
I know that.
you're just ignorant, and you don't listen to the facts
I thought you liked being polite? *shrugs*

that the terrors suffers heavy blows,
Actually, that's no fact.

and that their acts(those which succeed) are much less frequent.
There's the keyword: succeed. This means that there aren't any less terrorist attacks, but that they are less succesful. This means that you've gotten better at defending yourselves, but NOT at rooting out the terrorists, because there still are just as many terrorists.
One of the things many people do, including you, apparently, is look at certain test results, and then immediately conclude something from those result which doesn't actually need to have anything to do with those test results.

we defend ourselves, we don't attack. you think that if a bus full of citizens explodes in the middle of our street, we should do nothing about it, and that's madness...
No, I don't. Stop twisting my words and stop seeking hidden meanings.

we defend ourselves, we don't attack. you think that if a bus full of citizens explodes in the middle of our street, we should do nothing about it, and that's madness...
1) A mission to kill a bunch of terrorists because a terrorist attack has just been committed is a retaliation mission.
2) A mission to kill a terrorist leader, or a certain terrorist camp because they are a danger to you is a valid mission.

Now, 1) should stop, because they mainly cause hatred and are only meant to instill fear into the hearts of the terrorists. The terrorists, however, only become more fanatical. As I've shown above, the number of terrorists hasn't decreased, while that IS the entire point of these missions.

But 2) is meant to root out the terrorists and stop them from (successfully) committing those terrorist attacks, and I haven't ONCE said you should stop those.
 
Call it fatalistic, but I can't see this clusterfuck called Israel and Palestine ending until a WMD of some kind is used on one of the factions. And then they'll both step back, sue for peace, and look to the EU and US to fund the massive political, geographic and religious changes that will occur. In any case, we all get shafted.

The only silver lining to the whole situation is that it acts as a perfect example of how NOT to handle things.
 
Oh god, this is idiotic...

Just give up Sander, there's just no reasoning with some people... Believe me.
 
Back
Top