Moral Graph

[John Uskglass]

Bah! You bunch of amoral sinners! You will all burn when day of reckoning comes! The power of Christ will smite you!

Big money says you did'nt score within .1 of any of my numbers.

 

[welsh]

I am with Ratty.

Love that Poultry lovin' question. Kind of reminds me of that time with cow..... on the farm....


ahum... nevermind.

 

[Murdoch]

Love that Poultry lovin' question. Kind of reminds me of that time with cow..... on the farm....

And yet you look down on The Order for its gayness.

 

[Ashmo]

Even though you or i dont care about what people do in their private lives, doesn't the thought of someone screwing a dead chicken make your skin crawl........ sure it doesn't hurt anyone but couldn't you picture Jebus doing something simular........with a gumball machine? isnt that even just a little disturbing?

What exactly is the difference between imagining him do it with a dead chicken and a live one other than thinking about the poor chicken (which wouldn't be the first thought coming to my mind actually -- more like "Eep.").

 

[Elissar]

This morality test is fucked up.. basically it said i had no idea why i think things like fucking dead chickens or one's own sister are wrong... but as far as i can tell, it bases it's assumption of morality on the belief in god. That's just fucking bias.

 

[Dove]

I concur. There's more health risk eating your pet that was run over than there would be "moral" problems.

/edit:

Results

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.00.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: -1.

 

[calculon000]

what People do in private is their own fucking business

live and let live.

Fuckin' eh!

 

[The Vault Dweller]

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.27.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.67.

Interesting...Im not an extremist like the rest of you fallin in the bottom-left or top-right.

Sincerely,
The Vault Dweller

 

[Dapper Dan Man]

Hey, I was bottom right. Personal morality isn't 'extreme'. "Wow I am an EXTREME moral archtype!" "Rock on dude!"

 

[The Vault Dweller]

Hey, I was bottom right. Personal morality isn't 'extreme'. "Wow I am an EXTREME moral archtype!" "Rock on dude!"

Oops sorry! Ya you and one other person landed in the bottom right.

:!: ,
The Vault Dweller

 

[Sorg]

imagine that God has declared that drinking water is wrong, and when she is asked why she replies honestly "for no other reason than that I say it is."

she? wtf?

anyway:

 

[DJ Slamák]

she? wtf?

That's political correctness for you.

Anyway, I too have parked in the bottom left corner, with the same "omg make up your mind sucker " commentary. I think the problem lies in different definitions of "wrong": I took "wrong" to mean "devious", which fucking a frozen chicken objectively is; but the authors of the test probably intended for it to mean "immoral", which I don't believe it is as long as it doesn't prompt the guy to harm other living things or otherwise violate common notions of decency (it literally said "he remains an upstanding member of his community").

 

[Mikey]

If that dude wants to shag his chicken and his sister, it's fine, so long as I don't have to watch.

 

[Ratty Sr.]

When I read the question about bother and sister having sex, I actually got a hard-on.

 

[[Rusty Chopper]]

Fully permissive. At least, they din't maim anyone.

 

[SuAside]

and yet another:
Fully permissive

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.07.
Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.
Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00.

 

[Silencer]

The flag question actually made me gloat.

 

[Brother None]

0 score, 'course, right down in the left-hand corner

I'm a bit tired of these American Christian-moral tests, though.

Why in God's name should I think it immoral to wipe my ass with a flag? Since when is patriotism related to morality? That's such a presumptuous question and not the first one like it I've seen in these tests either. They all seem to assume patriotism is a necessary part of morality. Well screw them.

It's stupid too, because it only really measures your morality when it comes to things that don't hurt people (at least it did for me). If the extent of morality is whether or not you judge people for things they do that don't hurt anybody, this'd be a happy world. Sadly it's not.

 

[Jebus]

Your Moralising Quotient is: 0.13.

Your Interference Factor is: 0.00.

Your Universalising Factor is: 0.00

And how did you know about that gumball-machine incident?

Y'know, I just wanted a free gum - and my arms weren't long enough... It wasn't what it looked like!

 

[Dapper Dan Man]

0 score, 'course, right down in the left-hand corner

I'm a bit tired of these American Christian-moral tests, though.

Why in God's name should I think it immoral to wipe my ass with a flag? Since when is patriotism related to morality? That's such a presumptuous question and not the first one like it I've seen in these tests either. They all seem to assume patriotism is a necessary part of morality. Well screw them.

It's stupid too, because it only really measures your morality when it comes to things that don't hurt people (at least it did for me). If the extent of morality is whether or not you judge people for things they do that don't hurt anybody, this'd be a happy world. Sadly it's not.

Design a Dutch moral system then, you nay-sayer! What would be some relevant examples of Dutch moral quandaries?