Offense or Defense? Based on what time frame? BAL has really slipped the last few years, on D and their offense is not the same as they were the beginning of the year. Flacco looked like shit the 2nd half.
Overall, based on this season and adjusted for opponent strength, and the stats' uses are judged against now 16 years of game-tracking. If you want to weigh late-season games as more important than early-season games in determining their current level of play, GB edges out Baltimore.
Ravens are 8th in offense, 3rd in defense. Packers are 4th in offense, second in defense.
Cimmerian Nights said:
They're not a pretty good Pats team. The D is a fucking shambles, O is all out of sorts. I could care less about Welker, having him or not won't break a game open. Watch Edelman pull in 10 catches for 100 yards effortlessly.
Okay seriously, stop making the Pats sound like the fucking Lions. They went 10-6, they're a good team. Hell, FootballOutsiders has them as the 4th best team in the league, offense 1st, defense 17th.
Cimmerian Nights said:
Might as well kick the Pats when they are down because they have 7 1st & 2nd round picks over the next two years. This is the first year of rebuilding, further gearing up for their second dynasty run forthcoming.
Your odds are good, but we'll see. The 2 middle of the pack 2nd rounders this year aren't a huge addition, the 2011 1st rounder is, although I expect the Raiders to actually improve next year unless Al Davis insists on starting Russell again.
But I like the idea of the 'rebuild': go with the draft and young talent.
Cimmerian Nights said:
Have to beat BAL first though.
Not an easy task with this bunch of stiffs.
The Ravens are good, but definitely not unbeatable, and they have a tendency to shoot themselves in the foot with penalties.
Regardless, I'll be rooting for the Ravens.
Cimmerian Nights said:
Yeah, I think so. Coaches with full front-office say don't work out often as it lacks checks and balances, even though teams are jumping all over the idea now. It requires not just a good coach, but a good coach with great organisational skills - and that's a lot harder to do. Cowher has 0 experience in the front office, and there's no reason to believe he'd be good at it, so it'd be a huge gamble. He'd be overhauling an organisation along with overhauling a team, that's a lot.
Add to that that his style of play (mostly his defensive 3-4 philosophy) will require spending a lot in free agency and the draft on getting new players, all the while dumping current serviceable players. And you have to teach a team an entire new way of playing. It could work out, but I'd expect it to add 1 or 2 years to our rebuild rather than speed things up.
Raheem Morris on the other hand has shown some promise. He was tied to Jagodzinski and Bates, both of whom reportedly weren't his choices. The defense improved tremendously after he fired Bates and took over the DC job himself, and honestly I think this defense is serviceable as a mediocre defense at this point in time (it was one of the worst of the league through the first half of the season), and with a bit more talent would be a good defense.
The offense is crap, but we have no real talent, and we fired our OC before the year which made it worse. QB position was a mess this year, but Freeman is showing plenty of promise. We have one good WR, two promising young WRs and a good pass-catching TE, and Cadillac has come back as a serviceable (but not great) RB. Maybe the current OC is good enough and he just needs a good offseason to teach his offense, or maybe we need a new OC altogether, but this is not really on Morris.
The players have continually said they have a lot of faith in Morris, Ronde Barber even suggesting that he'd leave the team if Morris leaves. The team has played hard for him, even when we were 1-10, and the wins against the Saints, the Packers and the Seahawks were encouraging. There's little to suggest that he's a bad head coach, and I couldn't care less about his media interaction. He also got us a high 2nd round pick for a failing DE.
Raheem's worst failure has been in picking the OC and DC, and those were supposedly forced upon him as the Bucs were late in promoting him and the owners wanted some bigger name coordinators. The latter may or may not be true, but he deserves another year to show what he can do with a good OC and DC, really.
Cimmerian Nights said:
Haven't seen it, but it's a tribute/parody of WFAN and it's more famous callers basicaly.
Philadelphia Phil rocks.
Yeah, that's pretty big. But I compared it to The Wrestler for a reason, it's also a story of a man whose life really revolves around one thing, which is not socially acceptable to use as the basis of your life. Basically, the main character is a loser, but it shows a pretty serious picture of his life. Not the comedy I expected it to be going in.