Operation: Anchorage first review and feedback

Brother None

This ghoul has seen it all
Orderite
Here's to hoping we won't be needing 101 round-up again, but the first impressions are in anyway. Rock, Paper, Shotgun's first impressions are that it's f'in impossible to even play the DLC thanks to the nebulous and ever unnecessary GFwL.<blockquote>Looking in the comments on the ShackNews story, I saw that it requires Games For Windows Live. Aha! Back into the game, and the “LIVE” option. Down pops the slick new interface, and asks me to log in or create an account. I have one, of course, so popped in the details. It needed to update. Good old Windows. Without asking my permission it quit out the game and downloaded its updates, then vanished without telling me it was done. Nice.

So I restart Fallout 3 and DOWNLOADS is still greyed out. Go into Live, tell it my account details again, and this time it downloads my account. Ta-da! The DOWNLOADS option is there! I’m surely almost there. I click it.

“No new content available.”

I see.

Back to the ShackNews comments. Ah, it seems you need to run GFWL. Quick search of my hard drive, as I’m sure I installed it once. Maybe not. Let’s screw that, I thought, and just download it again. I find the download on the site, get it, run it, and it’s installed. No option for a shortcut on the desktop, etc, but it’s there in the Start Menu. Any second now!

Run it. I require a hotfix for Windows XP to install GFWL. Apparently this couldn’t be included in any of the four hundred thousand updates Windows XP likes to install each week. So I click the option to get it, and find myself on this page, which eventually has the link after discussing error codes I haven’t seen. Download it, run it, and I have successfully completed the KB938759 Setup Wizard! It now requires a restart. Oh good Lord.</blockquote>Eurogamer's (and formally PC Zone's and infamous lovable geek) did get it to run, but not much to his benefit, as he chastises the DLC with a 5/10.<blockquote>I won't spoil the three missions that follow, but in all honesty there's little to taint. There are three prongs to the second half of Operation Anchorage: you can go left or go right with orders to blow further things up, and when you've done both of them there's a final assault that has you charge straight ahead through a variety of trenches, gun emplacements and worried Chinese folk. It's made fun by the fact you're allowed to pick a specific weapon load-out and take along a set of companions and/or robots, and the pyrotechnics are as impressive as ever, yet the whole experience feels simple and heavy-handed.

Sad to say, but remove the role-play dynamics from Fallout 3 and you're left with a slightly duff shooter (hey, even Todd Howard agrees). Operation Anchorage could have got away with it if it had been clever and more knowing, like the Tranquillity Lane simulation in the full game, but as it is it just feels shallow. For example, expositional holotapes are found in dull, obvious closets directly on your path and behind the easiest of locks; hacking into computers never really goes beyond redirecting the attention of a gun turret; hardly anything can be picked up or ferreted around in. Just so much of what makes the Fallout 3 experience such a complete and all-encompassing one is stripped away, and if you've already spent a fair proportion of the past four months in the DC wasteland you'll feel like you're only playing half the game you love.</blockquote>Meanwhile, based on popular feedback, if you do have Games for Windows Live, there's a good chance the DLC was not available in your country at the scheduled time for reasons yet to be explained. It was delayed in the US, and Briosafreak provided us with a list of countries confirmed to not have the DLC available yet (again, for reasons unknown): Australia, New Zealand, Holland, Portugal, Japan, Canada and Norway.
 
this smells so bad of failure I almost feel sorry for Bethesda.

wait, no I don't...
 
I love Fallout 3. I love it to an almost indecent extent. It was far and away my game of 2008, and doesn't look like being knocked out of my personal top spot for a good while yet. But when you sift out its role-play, the ammo-box inspection and the exploration and draft in a fleet of health and ammo regeneration points to compensate... well, affairs just feel shallow and somewhat naked. Hopefully a lesson has been learnt at Bethesda towers. Business as usual next time please.
Err... This is business as usual for Bethesda. Hell, you mention the crappy horse armor and pretend that they learned their lesson but I think this is proof that they haven't quite figured it out yet. Crap like Operation Anchorage is why I hate DLC that you have to pay for, I'd much rather get a full expansion for $20-30 instead of two to three hours for $7-15. The thing I don't get is, if it's so bad, why is it getting a score that suggests it's an average game? I guess if you consider the score suggesting that it's and average DLC then you'd be okay (though I'd say you should punish crap with bad scores) but not an average expansion.
 
From what I have been reading here and on other forums Operation Anchorage just sounds like a little extra, something you would include in a bigger expansion or give away for free, not pay ten dollars or ten euros for.
 
UncannyGarlic said:
The thing I don't get is, if it's so bad, why is it getting a score that suggests it's an average game? I guess if you consider the score suggesting that it's and average DLC then you'd be okay (though I'd say you should punish crap with bad scores) but not an average expansion.
I think it's being ranked as DLC. If we assume that horse armor is at the low end of the scale, then O:A might be average.
 
I'm pretty sure that most people who bought this, will fall for the same trick again when the next dlc is released.
 
AskWazzup said:
I'm pretty sure that most people who bought this, will fall for the same trick again when the next dlc is released.

Oh definitely, and I have the suspicion that the Pitt will turn out to be just a little bigger than one of the average Fallout 3 locations.
 
Speculation on the official forums is that they are going to recreate most of Pittsburgh, almost feel sorry for the people who believe that really.
 
Dionysus said:
I think it's being ranked as DLC. If we assume that horse armor is at the low end of the scale, then O:A might be average.
Yeah but I still have a problem with 2 hours of mediocre gameplay which add nothing new to the game that costs $10 getting a 5/10.

Alphadrop said:
Speculation on the official forums is that they are going to recreate most of Pittsburgh, almost feel sorry for the people who believe that really.
Indeed, though I glanced through earlier and noticed that there were a lot of people complaining about Operation: Anchorage, so maybe they'll have people turn on them.
 
thats really doubtfull.

Neither the Pitt or any other DLC can be in content a lot better or biger compared to the main game. Why? Look at it. They needed almost 4 years to make Fallout 3, and how much time did they used for the DLCs (all of them) 3 months? Maybe half a year? Who knows.

Already in the official Beth forum people speculate about the "Pitt" and I really ask my self from where some just get this totally high expecations it would display a huge city landscape "hopefully without the metro stations for travel" ...

I mean Fallout 3 is a mediocre Shooter-RPG-hybrid. Why should the Pitt or any DLC suddenly now become the holy grail compared to it? Seems at least to me very unlikely.
 
it's because of things like this that i'm glad i don't own the game. This DLC is just a way to squeeze some more money from the people that bought the game.
 
Big surprise... you rip out the few RPG elements that were in FO3, and you're left with a terrible FPS.

With so many good FPS's out there, why would Beth try a move like this? Their hubris is the answer, I think.
 
I'm sorry, I've tried FEAR 2 demo and I don't think that bethesda's fps can even compare in... well, anything- AI, graphics, animations, spooks, slow-mo and the fact that killing actually is satisfying.
 
Hopefully the new GFWL manager will get rid of the proprietary currency. I wouldn't mind using the service, but I'm not interested in buying any Microsoft fun bucks.
 
Back
Top