donperkan
Sonny, I Watched the Vault Bein' Built!
![](https://www.nma-fallout.com/xencustomimages/nma/nma_8.gif)
No, its his final gift to mankind since he has 15 different terminal diseases
OkayNo, its his final gift to mankind since he has 15 different terminal diseases
Hungary wants their stolen land back from the hohols. So does Poland and Romania. No matter how the war ends. Everyone gets a bite out of ukra one way or another.
Oh and uh.... Yeah congrats Sweden. You've just become a legit nuclear target now.
the one i got picture of. but when you got a total of just 31 of these "wunderwaffe" might as well be. the nazis also thought their tiger 2 was the shit and would turn the war around. they also got proved wrong.
No. Putin has been quoted as saying he wants Biden to stay in. Reading between the lines, he's basically saying he wants to be able to continue doing whatever he wants while the U.S. economy destroys itself funding a war that is completely untenable. Doesn't take a strategy genius to see what he's doing.Nah that's what Putin wants comrade.
I've thought the same but again isn't the reverse psychology abit too obvious? You gotta remember the level this bs is on. But again you and me ain't strategic geniuses.No. Putin has been quoted as saying he wants Biden to stay in. Reading between the lines, he's basically saying he wants to be able to continue doing whatever he wants while the U.S. economy destroys itself funding a war that is completely untenable. Doesn't take a strategy genius to see what he's doing.
Besides internet irredentists and the Hungarian Homeland movement, no EU nation wants to change the internationally recognised borders of Ukraine.
Russia has for several years violated Swedish airspace and conducted mock nuclear attacks. It has been like this since the Cold War, nothing new for us.
Losing one abrams changes nothing, but you can't say the same with Russia losing several naval vessels. Losing a tank is a tactical blunder, but losing dominance of the western Black Sea is a strategic catastrophe for Russia.
Bit too obvious? You severely underestimate how stupid the powers that be think all of us normies are. All? No. Most? Seems like it. Just look at the piss performance of our public education system right now in the United States.but again isn't the reverse psychology abit too obvious?
in sweden not just the air gets violated... hehe...
neither giving 31 abrams and 28 f16's here and there won't change the outcome. and loosing dominance over the black sea is a little much to be said. only reason ukra managed to sink a few ships is because nato drones that are flown from nato countries in proximity to ukraine.
remember that whole deal with the drone that was supposedly made to crash by the russians in the black sea? ye the good ol' bois actually crashed it themselves in the sea to hide the evidence of them providing battle information to ukra. cause you know, that would constitute direct involvement into the conflict thus making it an act of war. also, you can't loose naval dominance of something when your opponent doesn't even have a navy to begin with. the american ships in there don't count because they can't officially get directly involved.
In what world is the US economy weaker than the Russian?No. Putin has been quoted as saying he wants Biden to stay in. Reading between the lines, he's basically saying he wants to be able to continue doing whatever he wants while the U.S. economy destroys itself funding a war that is completely untenable. Doesn't take a strategy genius to see what he's doing.
You're just talking out of your ass, and you know it. If Russia had total naval supremacy, they would be able to stop the flow of goods and grains from Ukranian harbors, but they can't. From february to july 2022 Russia had this capacity, and prevented all exports from Ukranian harbors, but since the the collapse of the grain deal last summer, Russia hasn't been able to do it again. Exports are almost at pre-fullscale invasion levels. As Ukraine has shown, you don't need a conventional navy to change the balance of power at sea.
Nato is already involved in the war and has been since the start as a non-belligerent. Saying aid won't help is usually the last empty threat from the Kremlin after Nato breaks another red line by sending verboten equipment. Thank God we've sent more than 31 abrams and two dozen F16s.
Putin gets Ukraine and control over the majority of wheat and grain export. And the U.S somehow is gonna take Greenland, by either getting out of NATO or by throwing Denmark out somehow. - I'm not saying I belive this but I wouldn't be surprised if that were the case.
Oil.what the fuck? why is the US interested in greenland?
First, the grains are being shipped in trucks through Romania. Because the Romanians are the only morons that still allow it. And then they make their way over into the rest of Europe. Its why all the farmers were protesting for a few weeks ago. Because the cheap, gmo and pesticide ridden shit from ukraine is being sold at dumping prices and its putting EU farmers who have to abide strict EU regulations to sell their grains, out of business. Second, maybe you misunderstood or I should;ve been more clear. What I ment was, essentially the little drops in the bucket in terms of equipment, like a few old tanks, apc's and planes that nato is giving them are not enough to make a difference in battle. Their effect is for propaganda mostly. And they are all being destroyed soon after entering battle. All this "aid" is doing nothing more than prolonging bloodshed and bankrupting ukra for the next 1000 yrs. Because all that equipment they got it certainly was not free. When this is over someone will have to pay the bills for that. And again, WW2, when america was giving aid to the allies figthing in europe, some countries paid for that many years after that conflict has ended.
bonus: zelensky's kidnapping squads
what the fuck? why is the US interested in greenland?
Oil.
which can't be said about the USSR, which had its debt written off in the 70s.
European Agriculture Commissioner, Janusz Wojciechowski said:
"Due to costs for transit and transport via the two countries, grain from Ukraine is more expensive than from Russia. Only 2.3% of Ukrainian grain goes to ports as there are “no buyers”, he said."
"It is not economically viable to send those cereals to Africa. It is Ukraine that needs to find buyers."
"Before the war, EU agri-food imports from Ukraine stood at €7 billion. In 2022 they reached €13 billion. Of this increase, almost €5 billion worth of exports went to the five countries."
The grains are not even Ukra's. They belong to Blackrock and Vanguard owned farming subsidiaries which are grown now in Ukra. They are of very low quality and unsafe for consumption due to the pesticides used on them.
If the majority of grains wouldn't end up in the EU then there would be no need for countries to currently receive any subsidies to help their respective farming sectors or for farmers to dump brahmin shit in front of their governments as sign of protest, because they are going out of business. There were no farmers protests before the grains from Ukra started flooding in.
And Russia is actually giving the seized Ukra grains away now to African countries for free https://www.reuters.com/markets/com...-free-grain-six-african-countries-2024-02-20/
And why wouldn't they take those grains lol? Who said they are using it themselves?
The age of the equipment that Ukra received the majority of time is ranging from 1960 to 1980 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_military_aid_to_Ukraine_during_the_Russo-Ukrainian_War
According to mainstream sources. You said Russia's lost 3 times more? What sources? Ukra sources? You actually trust that lmao when both sides are spewing out propaganda en masse? There is no telling yet what side has lost how much. But what we do know is that Russia has the production capacity to sustain the war. Meanwhile according to your media, it takes about a year to fulfill an "order" for Ukra by the NATO coalition. Which begs the next question: how much of what was received now is left?
And why would the Russians gloat about destroying old crap anyway? Everyone is interested in seeing new tanks being destroyed anyway. And it helps their propaganda apparatus too.
good on them lol
ahaha check this Retardiv dude out.
Pack your gear and go to the front. Report back what it's like if you manage to live long enough to share your experience. All the weapons in the world won't make a difference if there are no fingers left to pull triggers.
Too lazy to write the entire thing and more importantly I don't respect them enough. It's not racism or xenophobia. I have other reasons that resulted from interacting with many of them in the past year or so.If you don't mind me asking, why do you write "ukra" instead of Ukrainian and Ukraine?
I Zee...Too lazy to write the entire thing and more importantly I don't respect them enough. It's not racism or xenophobia. I have other reasons that resulted from interacting with many of them in the past year or so.
Wrong. We already have a leveled playing field, kept leveled by various state subsidies, it allows consumers to have affordable, regulated, locally produced food and allows the producers to remain competitive within the union. Allowing imports from third countries drives down the prices, forcing those who cannot compete out of the business.Ukranian entry into the single market would create a level playing field among farmers and enable fair competition.
The war is over, the objective has been achieved. Russian diaspora regions have been annexed in to a federation and granted autonomy, something they asked for since the dissolution of the soviet union. There is no going back, those regions will never be part of ukraine again, not without ethnic cleansingHowever, if the armed forces cannot secure a decisive victory in a couple of years, Russia may find itself in a tough spot, particularly if current trends persist.