NATO tends to go for common & easy to pronounce code words, for obvious reasons.
Russia unveils first image of its Satan 2 super-nuke
- Thread starter MutantScalper
- Start date
MutantScalper
Dogmeat
If all the MIRVs hit the same, say, town, then that place is getting effed up big time. Like what if they all hit Aston Villa's home stadium? I'm not a fan of theirs.
D
Deleted member 93956
Guest
"Russia completed the Manhattan Project!" And that's when you know
Throatpunch
Banned
They should aim them at the next labour party conference.
Dude, if that name is ever appropiate, then it sure is with nuclear weapons. What would you name it? Griffith? Or maybe even Casca, because she also blows.
I dunno just doesnt seem like a good idea to be so antagonistic towards someone who just made a big destructive weapon right next to you.
Also how dare you! Griffith is pure.
SarcasticGoodGuy
*R O T T E N*
Pretty big. Are they overcompensating for something? 
Overused joke much?
Overused joke much?
So is a nuclear explosion, my friend. So is a nuclear explosion. A clansing fire in an overgrown forrest, can do wonders!
HEIL ATOM!
SarcasticGoodGuy
*R O T T E N*
children of atom haha what a faction
bethesda's skills at making baddie guys into grey guys w/ far harbor
truly a masterpeace of dlc and shuld be respected more than silly world blooz amirite?
Fun fact, you're also a SATAN.
SarcasticGoodGuy
*R O T T E N*
Oh. Oh I missed something here. I thought you were praising Bethesda's beautiful imagining of the best Fallout faction to date.
The only cleaning fire I want is the one that will purge the subhuman genes for the supremacy of the Aryan masterrace.
MutantScalper
Dogmeat
Nothing says "Christmas-time" like a new Russian super-nuke called Satan 2.
In practice, they'd target 2 to 5 MIRVs per high value target, not for destructive potential but simply to lower the chance of anti-air defenses being able to take down all MIRVs before the detonation.
So a single Satan 2 missile would on average obliderate 4 to 7 cities or military bases within a Texas or western europe sized area. That's hardly "destruction" of "France" though. If you're in the general area, you go underground for 2 to 4 week, you'll likely be fine.
Obviously a few of these missiles and you economically & militarily destroy a continent.
But the idea of using such nukes against France is retarded. Half the french nuclear arsenal is out at sea (mostly in subs) in order to prevent a "first strike" event where the french nuclear capability is destroyed in one fell swoop. Russia would be buttfucked into oblivion just as badly as France if they intended to use it.
Modern nukes are (outside of bunker busters) pretty much all defensive weapons under M.A.D. doctrine.
Russia is a bit bigger then France though, how many nukes does France have? Enough to cover all of Russia? I am pretty sure Russia has enough to cover all of France ...
valcik
So Old I'm Losing Radiation Signs
Large parts of Russia are uninhabited though, the allies wouldn't have to nuke frozen taiga with less than 2 people (i.e. old drunken hunter living in his log hut) on square km.
Yeah, but if those drunk hunters are the only surivors, Russia wins!
Prone Squanderer
A bit of a Sillius Soddus.
That sounds like it could be one hell of a good book.