Shacknews interview on Fallout 3 with Pete Hines

yevinorion said:
I don't presume to tell you how to feel about this, after all, I'm very new to the franchise so I haven't harboured the years of fondness and appreciation as you all have, but I would just say...give it a chance. No game will be Fallout, no game will be Fallout 2. But there's a chance that Beth's Fallout 3 might actually *gasp* be a good game in its own right.

Tell you what, we'll give it a chance the moment we see something that's actually promising. Also, for the empty "no game will be" rhetoric, please go to the frontpage, click "glittering gems of hatred", read.

Seeing the same PR hype we saw with gluttoncreeper and Interplay's BoS and that we know Bethesda used for "promises" on Oblivion and Legacy is not promising.

Let me put it this way; you might have to be bitter to interpret it negatively, but you have to be a naive fool to interpret it positively. It is, in reality, completely meaningless.

'cept for Pete affirming that they turned down original Fallout devs asking for jobs. Imagine that "Hey, can I work on the sequel you guys are making to the game I created?" "No, we know how to do the game much better than you."
 
yevinorion said:
I'm guessing my relative 'newness' to the world of Fallout and to the online Fallout fan community is to blame for my misunderstanding of how you all are so negative towards any breath of the words "Bethesda" or "Oblivion".

Win a free explanation! <u>Click here</u> now!
 
yevinorion said:
(snip)

give it a chance

WoozTec bides you Hello and Welcome to the NMA Forums, insert_name_here _______ Please, before posting about a subject, inform yourself about the matter at hand. The News forum is entirely at your disposition and you may freely read the numerous threads in which this particular subject is discussed. Furthermore, the NMA Forums are equipped with a very useful tool, the SEARCH function.

Welcome And Enjoy Your Stay
WoozTec Wishes You A Very Nice Day


But...these are the opinions of a Fallout newb...let them be washed away in the tide of the loyal and true fan's views.


*bweep*

WoozTec kindly informs you that Trolling is an infraction to Forum Rules, recidivism might result in a permanent ban.
 
Good God, where do all these "Give Bethesda's ObliviFallout a chance" people suddenly come from?
It's almost like a biblical plague.

Either a lot of people are suddenly discovering that the Fallout franchise exists or the people at Bethesda have written some program that keeps making new accounts and then posts in which they urge the older Fallout fans to give Beth's Fallout 3 a try.

It can't be like this can it, Bethesda suddenly realising that they do need the Fallout community after all to ensure that their product sells well enough that they are trying to change our opinions by overwhelming us with posts like this?

Look people, its not as if most of us decided that because we don't like Bethesda that we automatically assume that their Fallout 3 will be a crapfest.
We, or at least I have looked at the background of the company, what games they have produced so far and the comments they have been making on the internet.

And please don't come up with more of the "Turn based is out" and "First Person is tha' future", other posters on this board have expressed far better than I could why this is not the case.

Edit: Company, not Country
 
@topic

Well.. I got the message. He [Pete] and the whole Bethesda crew know Fallout. He even plays it on his Laptop. Everytime, everywhere.

Did I miss something? I guess the amount of recurrences within this interview puzzled me a bit..
 
Ok, first of all, thank you guys for the links, they prove a very interesting read and have given me a lot more insight into why you all feel the way you do.

And as for The Dutch Ghost, I agree completely with the statement you make about turn-based vs FP/RT. Because a game is new does not mean it has to be RT, I still find my favourite games are turn-based games.

And no, I'm not a Beth-spawned forum account to try and redeem their image in the Fallout fans eyes. :) I'm just a gamer who has recently fallen in love with the Fallout universe and is trying to learn about the community and its current state of feeling towards the upcoming game.

8)
 
Look at it this way, yevi, Fallout 3 can never be judged as a game in its own right. It's a sequel. It carries too much baggage from the original games not to be judged as a Fallout game.

Maybe Bethesda can get away with marketing this to console magazines, but I doubt that anybody who played the original Fallouts, even Desschlock, could take a Fallout 3 that has nothing to do with the original games and truly like it. It won't be what they want.

I'm not saying that IS what's going to happen. I'm not going to say I don't think it will, though, because honestly I have every reason to fear that it will.
 
When another company takes over the franchise, its like a movie sequel being done by a different director than who did the first. The 80's were littered with movie sequels that did not mesh with their pedestor because of this. Take speed and speed 2 for instance.
So in light of these more recent events... I have almost no faith that Bethesda will get it right.
 
And please don't come up with more of the "Turn based is out" and "First Person is tha' future", other posters on this board have expressed far better than I could why this is not the case.
My opinion
There is no need for a discussion if fallout 3 should be turnbased or not.
Fallout is isometric and turnbased.
If other games are or are not is not of interest. It has nothing to do a thing with it. I really don't like it to see people discussing about it, it's just waste of time.
 
You all make good points. :) Especially you, 10mmCurator, with the director analogy.

I guess I just am of the opinion that Beth will probably make a good game, just not necessarily a good Fallout RPG (in the true sense of the acronym).

Personally, I liked Oblivion, but as an action game, where I can load up on weapons and armor and run around bashing the crap out of baddies. I agree with the consensus that it doesn't qualify as a true RPG, but rather a FP Action game with adjustable stats.

As such, I can totally understand why everyone is skeptical based on their previous outings. I guess at the end of the day, we'll just have to cross our fingers and pray for the best.
 
Whats horrifying is that Petey is convinced that Oblivion is not only an RPG but a good one.

That is the biggest reason to fear a Beth made Fallout 3.
 
Here's Todd's vision and fanbase

Thats an absolute classic. :lol: Someone should create an anti-add banner based on that picture.

As such, I can totally understand why everyone is skeptical based on their previous outings. I guess at the end of the day, we'll just have to cross our fingers and pray for the best.

It can't be like this can it, Bethesda suddenly realising that they do need the Fallout community after all to ensure that their product sells well enough that they are trying to change our opinions by overwhelming us with posts like this?

Its interesting how the people that tell us to trust Bethesda always have around 5 posts. :wink: :wink: Or am I being too cynical? :)
 
Also, Pete, big question, if there were original Fallout devs doing a "job inquiry", per your own words, where are these guys now? Not good enough to work for Bethesda?

That is a sour point. On one hand I understand their need to do their own thing, but I can't help thinking that there never was a chance for them to work for Beth, since they are respected in the community and didn't cut all ties with the fans, so the company feared that their precious secrecy could be broken. A bit paranoid view on things, and curious since Bethesda asked the Van Buren devs to think about inquiring for a job, they were ready to give a try to a few of them in the days after the announcement of the end of Van Buren/FO3, on the Iplay forum.

Oh well not really surprising at the end, so the only thing that I find hard to swallow is the fact they said no to the long-time fallout devs and then hired and later promoted a kid whose hate for the Fallout fansites and every Fallout fan that dared to speak something against his simplistic views was legendary on the Iplay forum. That isn't nice.


blacklisted fansites can't see very much, that's true.

I've already said in another place that I'm not comfortable to say "blacklisted" anymore, since if we want to be rigorous then STG and RPGCodex are indeed blacklisted, but with NMA links still working on the TES forum and a few channels still open it's better to talk about a boycott and not an outright blacklisting.

And I know it's their way of doing things, to keep a low profile until nothing can be changed in the games, but in this case it's a boycott, not just business as usual, I would only like to know their reasons to do it, since their explanations are too vague.

Pete Hines wrote:

Again, you can't make the game that everybody wants because you'll get ten different answers about what that game is.



Glutton Creeper wrote:

We know we cannot please everyone


Chuck Cuevas wrote:

So trying to please [Fallout fans] was almost like trying to please everybody, but you can't.

Yeah that textbook PR talk there. But let me add two notes:
First I don't believe everyone was that knowledgeable of the games, or that everyone was a fan.
second to be fair there are a lot of Fallout fans working on the game, so that's partially true, I remember their love letters to Fallout on the Iplay forum.

Pete Hines:here was a game reviewer who emailed us and said Oblivion was crashing every five minutes, and we got him in touch with QA and it turned out his printer had software attached to it that was running in the background and making Oblivion crash all the time. I mean, how can you--I promise, that has never happened to an Xbox 360 user in the history of 360s, that some printer driver would be doing this. [laughs] We certainly, for something like the Elder Scrolls or other franchises where it's appropriate, want to make games available on all the platforms where it's appropriate, but at the same time it's a pain in the ass. People just don't understand what a pain in the ass it is. All of these problems you don't have with a video game console.

Oh shit

Pete Hines: Absolutely. We'll continue to develop on PC for anything that's appropriate for PC.

Oh ok

Pete Hines: It's the vision of a group of folks. Much like The Elder Scrolls, it starts with Todd Howard who drives everything, but then there's definitely the lead designer, lead artist, lead programmer. More than anything, those team leads are the guys who champion for things, saying, "This is what it has to play like, this is what it has to look like, this is how the systems have to work." It's definitely a group of folks but at the end of the day it falls on Todd to set the pace and and how he thinks it should look and play.

So everything starts and ends with Todd? Everything? Hmm that's a great responsibility, but now we know who to turn our heads if something goes wrong. Or right, of course.

Pete Hines:There is a little bit of that sentiment out there that we have to prove that we're worthy to be the guys to make Fallout 3.

True, definitely true.

Pete Hines:I loved Baldur's Gate, Fallout.

OMG it's Per :) (inside joke, not important)

Pete Hines:That time is not that far off.

We'll wait then.
 
Interesting about how the old Fallout workers were turned down, when he says something like this:

"But we're always looking to expand, for new outside developers to work with, for other IP we might want to work with"
 
Let's try to take some stands

You see, talking profit and quality to gamers is hard, but it doesn't take a keen eye to spot money on the table.

Take Pop music for example.Does it sell?Yes.Does it make money?Yes.Does it have massive fan bases?Yes.

Take MMO.Does it sell?Yes.Does it make money?Yes.Does it have massive fan bases?Yes.


True.But have you ever heard people actually saying *why* they like it? No? Oh please, don't start the "hot body, character, graphics" arguments. Other than that. No reasons? Silence?

This is because these, how should I put this, "Big Hits" or "Triple Award" even "Best ___ of the year" , whatever term you gentlemen prefer, are made especially for people without any particular taste. For, how I call them, "sponge people".

Ask an Oblivion fan why he likes Oblivion.

The sponges will send 1$ sms to a poll about Big Brother (because it's fun), they'll buy the most expensive mobile phone (becouse they're cool) , will answer "oh I like all kinds of music, cars, games etc" (because they do) , that will pay 50$ more for a pink controller (because my neighbour has one), will buy the worst wine at the highest price (because it's French).

Now, back to topic, we all know what a big succes was Fallout. Now, how are the fans of the game? Are they anything like the ones listed above? No? That's because Fallout is a product which was untouched by PR or any marketing decisions that we see today.Who voice acted in the intro? Was it Ron Perlman or Patrick Steward?Yes, they're both Hollywood actors, but one is just a marketing ploy.

Now ask a Fallout Fan why he likes Fallout.
 
Davaris said:
Its interesting how the people that tell us to trust Bethesda always have around 5 posts. :wink: :wink: Or am I being too cynical? :)

Heheh...based on my own experience, I'd say it's because the new guys here (like myself) think the best of the situation before we get schooled in the history of the fallout franchise. :) A little knowledge goes a looooong way.
 
DarkPhilly said:
Here's Todd's vision and fanbase

B00005U8U6.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

:rofl:

You, sir had made me laugh. If you can make me laugh, then I believe that even the devil (if he existed) would laugh at your joke.

I tip my hat to you in thanks of your wonderful parody. :clap:
 
Back
Top