Not to
but he isn't a synth either, the game classes him as a human. My argument is that for example, in the game Morrowind, you have Silt Striders, it's implied that they move about, but even in Dragonborn DLC they don't, it is the illusion that they "Do more stuff when you're not looking." In the Construction set they are static. meaning that one can argue that they do not actually move. This is my argument. If Bethesda didn't include ANY gen 3 synths in the game and just had NPC's say "I'm a synth" or "That guy is a synth" You could also say that they are high on rads and imagining the whole thing. It's an excuse Bethesda and fanbois use to make a poop in the middle of your living room floor seem more interesting. NPC dialogue isn't lore, just like load screens aren't lore. All y'all are doing is arguing really bad writing to cover up really bad writing.
Edit: Oops, wrong guy
Bad writing is not lore, dialogue is not lore. When Preston says "another settlement needs your help", indefinitely, does that mean that in lore every settlement needs the players help. In lore the player helps 30 settlements on repeat? Does it mean that in lore zombies come back to superduper mart infinite times and raider lock the doors of corvega every 7 days with a new batch of raiders? Does it mean that when you take that teddy bear that someone puts one there a week later in the same spot. You are arguing piss poor dog shit writing. Stop being a filthy casual.
Is it lore that Sturges can't hack a novice computer to get a fusion core that are literally everywhere including dumpsters? Is it lore that he can also hack the Institutes data base that is above the players hacking ability?
Is it lore that Mamma Murphy killed a Death claw with one bullet in her gun. Man I've met some stupid in my days but you take the cake.