Re: Best game ever.
jamesmcm said:
I loved it. It's the best game I have ever played tbh.
Let me guess: you haven't played the previous Fallout RPGs
(and no, getting them in anticipation of Fallout 3 and not going beyond the Temple of Trials/cave of rats doesn't count)
Anyway, well... if this is the best game you've played, good for you, I gess. I don't envy the gaming experience it implies you have, though.
jamesmcm said:
But overall, it is an absolute masterpiece and I much preferred it to Fallout 2 where switching to and from combat is a slow and painful process,
And I, on the contrary, say that is Fallout 2 what is an absolute masterpiece and that I much prefer it to Fallout 3 where dealing with combat is a slow-minded and painful process.
Now, who wins?
jamesmcm said:
although really they are different kind of games.
It's good to see that you are able to discern such a basic fact. The only remaining question is whether you are also able to discern that no one kind of game is inherently better than other.
jamesmcm said:
Bethesda have produced a great game
"Opinions are like assholes, Dan - everyone's got 'em an they all stink. Goodbye"
-The Chosen One to "Dangerous" Dan McGrew.
So you do think (well, you actually state) that Bethesda has produced a great game. Well, I think just the contrary. Again: who is right?
jamesmcm said:
and I think it's a real shame some people dislike it
Is it really a shame for you that not all people agree with your point of view and see the things as you do? Seriously?...
Welcome to the 'freedom of thinking' world. You'll have a somewhat hard time around here, I guess.
jamesmcm said:
just because they are remembering a clunky, slow and dated isometric RPG from the '90s through rose-tinted, selective memory spectacles.
Have you ever stopped and consider that maybe, JUST maybe, it is that they actually love Fallout 2 better than a clunky, slow-minded and graphically-dated first-person shooter with minigames from Bethesda that some see through hype-tinted, memoryless spectacles?
jamesmcm said:
As great as Fallout was then - that doesn't mean all sequels must be rubbish.
Now this sentence makes no sense. If you consider Fallout great, how is that any sequel true to it would be rubbish?
... No, I won't ask you if you're aware of the ridiculousness of the blatant contradiction in your words; by reading plenty of your post, I'm positively sure you aren't.
And no; a Fallout sequel doesn't have to be rubbish. It simply has to be a true Fallout game, that is: a game of the same kind of the previous titles. If Bethesda thinks that the kind of game Fallout is is rubbish, then don't pretend to be making a sequel to it.
jamesmcm said:
It's a shame Black Isle didn't finish Van Buren in time for it to be released as a spin-off
Uh... What?
Van Buren an Spinoff... and a shooter with minigames a Fallout sequel?...
Are we living in Bizarro World?
jamesmcm said:
I was being honest - I think the reason people think Fallout 3 is worse than Fallout 2 is because they are selectively remembering the best parts of it rather than the dull tedium like the Temple Of Trials at the start
Are you serious?...
Are you really suggesting that we should remember a long and great gaming experience for a part that is less than the 0'001% of the game, which you even can beat in less than a minute, and that it is the contrary what is "being selective"?
Are you really aware the nonsense you've just said? I'm starting to wonder if you really want to be taken seriously
jamesmcm said:
and the general clunky combat.
Do I really need to bring the "Chosen One to Dan McGrew" quote again?...
jamesmcm said:
I think people hate it also because it's good and popular and many people liked the original Fallout because it was indie.
People hate Fallout 3 for being popular?
... Fallout, indie?
...
My friend, if you have proven something today, it is that you suffer a severe case of disinformation.
I would tell you that getting informed about what you want to talk about is a good way to prevent being ridiculous... but I somehow suspect that this advice would fall in deaf ears.
jamesmcm said:
I don't have such a biased, subjective view and can see that Fallout 3 is clearly by far a superior game.
......
If your previous quote "
As great as Fallout was then - that doesn't mean all sequels must be rubbish." was the king of the blatant contradictions, this one must be the god
Seriously, if you were really aware of the levels of hypocrisy and cynicism reached with that sentence, you'd never even consider conceiving it in your mind.
It is obvious that trying to explain you that it is precisely your bias and subjetive view what makes you proclaim Fallout 3 as a far a superior game over previous Fallouts is useless.
jamesmcm said:
But I love the way it has stealth/action gameplay as well as awesome RP elements. It really adds to the immersion.
"Awesome RP elements"...
I'd like you to tell me what are those Role-Play elements from Fallout 3 you are talking about. You won't be referring to the worthless stats and skills (which have been proven to be meaningless in comparison to player's skills), the quest compass (a paradigm of hand-holding) or the BUTTS... err VATS (aka bullet-time for dummies), will you?
jamesmcm said:
Well then stop complaining about Fallout 3 (...) You don't like FPS/RPGs? Well then don't play it - but don't sit on forums complaining about it non-stop.
And why, if I may ask, should we do what you order us to do instead of keep doing what we want? Because we are hurting your feeling?...
Poor boy; the only I can do for you in this regard is to feel sorry for you.
jamesmcm said:
I don't see why people are acting as if Bethesda have done something wrong
Uh... if that's really the case, then I suggest you to pick up one or two bobbleheads for the PE stat, seriously. Bethesda assured they were making a sequel to Fallout; instead, they ended up making a totally different kind of game from the previos ones. No matter how much you like it: as a sequel, they did it wrong.
jamesmcm said:
no whinging will make Van Buren any more complete.
And no whining will make us stop pointing out Fallout3's blatant flaws and stupidity. Sorry
jamesmcm said:
Well I dislike turn-based combat (especially when it's the only optin) and also love stealth-based games like Thief so I feel Fallout 3 is a huge improvement.
And finally, this sentence sums up your whole argument: "I like Fallout 3 better than the previous ones, therefore it is objectively a better game and all who disagree with me is being biased and subjective".
You've not only show us that you're generally uninformed about the discussion theme, but also that you are unaware of the difference between an
argument and an
opinion. You really should be aware that this, in addition to your blatant contradictions, the general tone of your posts and the fact that you seem to be pissed off by other people's different opinion doesn't help you if you really want to be taken seriously.